Author
Abstract
To explore how inter-city commuters evaluate the quality of high-speed rail (HSR) services in the Suzhou–Shanghai corridor, this study highlights the importance of HSR for economic integration and mobility across cities, offering a fast, safe, and comfortable travel option. It underscores that HSR has emerged as a widely adopted commuting mode for many inter-city commuters, particularly those residing in smaller cities but working in larger metropolitan areas. The paper delves into various factors affecting passenger satisfaction, such as comfort, punctuality, security, and the ease of connections between other transport modes and HSR stations. By examining Suzhou–Shanghai high-speed rail commuters through importance–performance analysis, this research assesses the gaps between intercity commuting passengers' expectations and the actual performance of HSR and transfer services. Key findings indicate that aspects of service quality such as train fares, quiet conditions on trains, and parking availability at HSR stations require improvement. HSR services overall achieve relatively high satisfaction, which scores 3.88, but significant disparities exist in transfer experiences: commuters using public transport for transfers report lower satisfaction (3.6), while those opting for self-driving or ride-hailing show notably higher satisfaction (4.11). This highlights that transfer links are critical to shaping the holistic HSR commuting experience. Public transport currently acts as a bottleneck due to issues such as poor synchronization and comfort, whereas private and on-demand options better meet commuters’ needs for timeliness, reliability, and comfort. Enhancing overall HSR commuter satisfaction thus requires optimizing the entire transfer ecosystem, particularly improving public transport transfer services. The study concludes by offering recommendations to policymakers and HSR operators on how to enhance service quality, improve commuter satisfaction, and increase inter-city HSR ridership by addressing operational inefficiencies and service gaps.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:179:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25005281. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.