Author
Listed:
- Liang, Lijun
- Chen, Peirong
- Ma, Mengze
Abstract
The transition to Sustainable Aviation Fuel (SAF) is a critical strategy for aligning China's aviation sector with global climate commitments. This study develops an integrated economic–environmental–energy complex-system framework for airlines and employs a system dynamics approach to simulate the economic viability and development potential of China's current SAF pilot policy, using Beijing as a case study. The model further explores optimized policy pathways. Key findings indicate that: (1) Airlines' economic contribution is highly vulnerable to external shocks, such as the COVID-19 pandemic; (2) While the existing 1 % SAF blending pilot policy is economically viable in the short term due to its limited adverse impact, its long-term sustainability is questionable as economic contribution begins to decline markedly after a post-pandemic inflection point; (3) Increasing the SAF blending ratio gradually erodes airline profits, as cost pressures from SAF adoption outweigh potential benefits like carbon emission reductions and partial cost pass-through to passengers, which is influenced by price elasticity of demand; (4) While a basic subsidy for SAF use is marginally effective, only when subsidies cover 70 % of SAF costs do airlines begin to recover profitability with SAF blending, albeit with diminishing returns over time; (5) An additional subsidy tied to emission reduction efficiency significantly enhances airlines' economic contribution, with more pronounced long-term benefits. Based on these results, the study proposes an integrated and flexible policy combining dual-subsidy and production-side cost-reduction measures to balance short-term transition needs with long-term fiscal sustainability. By integrating multidisciplinary perspectives and adopting a complex-system framework, this study offers theoretical and practical innovations—providing evidence-based insights for policymakers and airline managers in designing effective SAF transition strategies.
Suggested Citation
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:177:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004871. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.