IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v176y2026ics0967070x25004615.html

Barriers to convenient electric vehicle charging: Evidence from China's first-tier cities

Author

Listed:
  • Shi, Lei
  • Lin, Boqiang

Abstract

The Chinese government has established a charging infrastructure framework that prioritizes private community-based slow charging, supplemented by public fast charging facilities. However, the deployment of private charging points in communities has faced opposition from multiple stakeholders. Based on a micro-level survey, this study analyzes the factors underlying such resistance. Key findings include: a) Property management companies often obstruct charging infrastructure development, and their opposition also influences other residents negatively. b) Increased EV adoption does not directly raise residents' support, indicating a need for further intervention to overcome barriers. c) Residents prefer grid companies to take a more active role in the installation process to reduce complexity and resolve difficulties. Accordingly, we recommend that the government clarify the responsibilities of property management companies, charging infrastructure providers, and grid companies through policy implementation, emphasizing the coordinating role of grid companies. Additionally, property management practices should be more strictly regulated to ensure cooperation with EV owners in installing charging facilities.

Suggested Citation

  • Shi, Lei & Lin, Boqiang, 2026. "Barriers to convenient electric vehicle charging: Evidence from China's first-tier cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:176:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004615
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103918
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25004615
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103918?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:176:y:2026:i:c:s0967070x25004615. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.