IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v173y2025ics0967070x25003397.html

Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Qiang
  • Rasouli, Soora
  • Feng, Tao

Abstract

The increase in E-commerce has led to substantial demand for parcel delivery across the world that courier companies have to deploy more dedicated delivery vehicles to satisfy the demand. The emission and congestion caused by these vehicles, especially in dense urban areas, exacerbate in the future if not dealt with timely. Crowd-Sourced Delivery (CSD) can be seen as a means to offset part of the delivery demand dealt with by commercial couriers. Within this system, the ordinary travelers are proposed to deliver a parcel during their pre-planned trips. In order to minimize the environmental footprint of parcel deliveries, it would be ideal for CSD tasks to be accepted while using active and public transportation. (Empirical) studies, so far, have mainly focused on one particular transportation mode when offering CSD tasks. This approach prevents identifying the relative potential of modes in the full mobility system. The aim of this study is therefore to broaden our understanding regarding potential of different modes in facilitating CSD adoption. For the operational feasibility of the service, we proposed to integrate CSD within Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) framework. In the context of CSD-MaaS integration, it is expected that potential crowd-shippers adopting different transportation modes exhibit varying preferences regarding CSD tasks they are being allocated due to distinct features associated with various modes. To understand the willingness of travelers to accept a CSD task across different transportation modes, and features of CSD tasks suitable for users of different modes, in this study a stated choice experiment was designed in which the respondents were allowed to simultaneously choose transportation modes and evaluate parcel delivery tasks. An error component mixed logit model was employed to assess the effects of various transportation and parcel related factors on travelers’ decisions while accounting for the correlation between transportation modes with similar features. The results indicate that the willingness to accept a parcel delivery task varies significantly across transportation modes. Car-based modes, particularly private cars, were the most preferred, while sustainable modes such as private (E-)bikes and public transport demonstrated notable potential. Conversely, emerging shared mobility modes were less favored as carriers in CSD. Additionally, delivery task characteristics, travel contexts, and socio-demographic factors significantly influenced the decision to accept a delivery task, with varying effects across transportation modes. These findings provide critical insights for transportation planners and transport operators, contributing to the development of more sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Qiang & Rasouli, Soora & Feng, Tao, 2025. "Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.