IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v173y2025ics0967070x25003397.html

Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options

Author

Listed:
  • Qi, Qiang
  • Rasouli, Soora
  • Feng, Tao

Abstract

The increase in E-commerce has led to substantial demand for parcel delivery across the world that courier companies have to deploy more dedicated delivery vehicles to satisfy the demand. The emission and congestion caused by these vehicles, especially in dense urban areas, exacerbate in the future if not dealt with timely. Crowd-Sourced Delivery (CSD) can be seen as a means to offset part of the delivery demand dealt with by commercial couriers. Within this system, the ordinary travelers are proposed to deliver a parcel during their pre-planned trips. In order to minimize the environmental footprint of parcel deliveries, it would be ideal for CSD tasks to be accepted while using active and public transportation. (Empirical) studies, so far, have mainly focused on one particular transportation mode when offering CSD tasks. This approach prevents identifying the relative potential of modes in the full mobility system. The aim of this study is therefore to broaden our understanding regarding potential of different modes in facilitating CSD adoption. For the operational feasibility of the service, we proposed to integrate CSD within Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) framework. In the context of CSD-MaaS integration, it is expected that potential crowd-shippers adopting different transportation modes exhibit varying preferences regarding CSD tasks they are being allocated due to distinct features associated with various modes. To understand the willingness of travelers to accept a CSD task across different transportation modes, and features of CSD tasks suitable for users of different modes, in this study a stated choice experiment was designed in which the respondents were allowed to simultaneously choose transportation modes and evaluate parcel delivery tasks. An error component mixed logit model was employed to assess the effects of various transportation and parcel related factors on travelers’ decisions while accounting for the correlation between transportation modes with similar features. The results indicate that the willingness to accept a parcel delivery task varies significantly across transportation modes. Car-based modes, particularly private cars, were the most preferred, while sustainable modes such as private (E-)bikes and public transport demonstrated notable potential. Conversely, emerging shared mobility modes were less favored as carriers in CSD. Additionally, delivery task characteristics, travel contexts, and socio-demographic factors significantly influenced the decision to accept a delivery task, with varying effects across transportation modes. These findings provide critical insights for transportation planners and transport operators, contributing to the development of more sustainable and efficient last-mile delivery solutions.

Suggested Citation

  • Qi, Qiang & Rasouli, Soora & Feng, Tao, 2025. "Acceptance of crowd-sourced delivery tasks using diverse transportation mode options," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003397
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25003397
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.103796?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Greene, William H. & Hensher, David A., 2007. "Heteroscedastic control for random coefficients and error components in mixed logit," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 43(5), pages 610-623, September.
    2. Baldi, Mauro Maria & Manerba, Daniele & Perboli, Guido & Tadei, Roberto, 2019. "A Generalized Bin Packing Problem for parcel delivery in last-mile logistics," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 274(3), pages 990-999.
    3. Alnaggar, Aliaa & Gzara, Fatma & Bookbinder, James H., 2021. "Crowdsourced delivery: A review of platforms and academic literature," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 98(C).
    4. Fessler, Andreas & Thorhauge, Mikkel & Mabit, Stefan & Haustein, Sonja, 2022. "A public transport-based crowdshipping concept as a sustainable last-mile solution: Assessing user preferences with a stated choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 210-223.
    5. Quan Dai & Hongfei Jia & Yao Liu, 2020. "Private vehicle-based crowdshipping for intercity express transportation: Feasibility assessment," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 16(2), pages 15501477209, February.
    6. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri, 2024. "Public transportation-based crowd-shipping initiatives: Are users willing to participate? Why not?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    7. Caiati, Valeria & Rasouli, Soora & Timmermans, Harry, 2020. "Bundling, pricing schemes and extra features preferences for mobility as a service: Sequential portfolio choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 123-148.
    8. Pourrahmani, Elham & Jaller, Miguel, 2021. "Crowdshipping in last mile deliveries: Operational challenges and research opportunities," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    9. John Olsson & Daniel Hellström & Henrik Pålsson, 2019. "Framework of Last Mile Logistics Research: A Systematic Review of the Literature," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 11(24), pages 1-25, December.
    10. Hess, Stephane & Palma, David, 2019. "Apollo: A flexible, powerful and customisable freeware package for choice model estimation and application," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 32(C), pages 1-1.
    11. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    12. Becker, Henrik & Balac, Milos & Ciari, Francesco & Axhausen, Kay W., 2020. "Assessing the welfare impacts of Shared Mobility and Mobility as a Service (MaaS)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 228-243.
    13. Bathke, Henrik & Hartmann, Evi, 2021. "Accepting a crowdsourced delivery - A choice-based conjoint analysis," Chapters from the Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conference of Logistics (HICL), in: Jahn, Carlos & Kersten, Wolfgang & Ringle, Christian M. (ed.), Adapting to the Future: Maritime and City Logistics in the Context of Digitalization and Sustainability. Proceedings of the Hamburg International Conf, volume 32, pages 65-95, Hamburg University of Technology (TUHH), Institute of Business Logistics and General Management.
    14. Ton, Danique & Duives, Dorine C. & Cats, Oded & Hoogendoorn-Lanser, Sascha & Hoogendoorn, Serge P., 2019. "Cycling or walking? Determinants of mode choice in the Netherlands," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 7-23.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Mohri, Seyed Sina & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G. & Lavieri, Patricia Sauri & Ghaderi, Hadi, 2025. "Crowd-shipping systems with public transport passengers: Operational planning," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    2. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2025. "The role of intermodality and environmental consciousness in the preferences for MaaS bundles: A hybrid choice modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    3. Tsouros, Ioannis & Tsirimpa, Athena & Pagoni, Ioanna & Polydoropoulou, Amalia, 2021. "MaaS users: Who they are and how much they are willing-to-pay," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 470-480.
    4. Rossolov, Oleksandr & Susilo, Yusak O., 2024. "Are consumers ready to pay extra for crowd-shipping e-groceries and why? A hybrid choice analysis for developing economies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 187(C).
    5. Mohamed Amr Sultan & Tomaž Kramberger & Mahmoud Barakat & Ahmed Hussein Ali, 2023. "Barriers to Applying Last-Mile Logistics in the Egyptian Market: An Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(17), pages 1-25, August.
    6. Rossolov, Oleksandr & Botsman, Anastasiia & Lyfenko, Serhii & Susilo, Yusak O., 2026. "Gender heterogeneity in couriers' mode choice behaviours: Crowd-shipping for E-groceries," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 130(C).
    7. Wang, Qian & Simoni, Michele D., 2025. "Crowdshipping preferences among public transit riders: Insights from Stockholm, Sweden," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    8. Garcia-Herrera, Alisson & Serrano-Hernandez, Adrian & Faulin, Javier, 2025. "Understanding the dynamics of crowdshipping in last-mile distribution within urban mobility: A comprehensive framework," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 101(C).
    9. Liu, Jianing & Wen, Xiao & Jian, Sisi, 2024. "Toward better equity: Analyzing travel patterns through a neural network approach in mobility-as-a-service," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 110-126.
    10. Bahareh Mansouri & Subhasmita Sahu & M. Ali Ülkü, 2023. "Toward Greening City Logistics: A Systematic Review on Corporate Governance and Social Responsibility in Managing Urban Distribution Centers," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 7(1), pages 1-20, March.
    11. Kim, Seheon & Rasouli, Soora, 2022. "The influence of latent lifestyle on acceptance of Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS): A hierarchical latent variable and latent class approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 304-319.
    12. Chua, Rachel & Wu, Min & Yuen, Kum Fai, 2025. "Sustainable crowdshipping: Navigating technological fit and security risks," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    13. Hasselwander, Marc & Bigotte, Joao F. & Antunes, Antonio P. & Sigua, Ricardo G., 2022. "Towards sustainable transport in developing countries: Preliminary findings on the demand for mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) in Metro Manila," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 501-518.
    14. Gleb V. Savin, 2021. "The smart city transport and logistics system: Theory, methodology and practice," Upravlenets, Ural State University of Economics, vol. 12(6), pages 67-86, October.
    15. Hörcher, Daniel & Graham, Daniel J., 2020. "MaaS economics: Should we fight car ownership with subscriptions to alternative modes?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 22(C).
    16. Scorrano, Mariangela & Danielis, Romeo, 2021. "Active mobility in an Italian city: Mode choice determinants and attitudes before and during the Covid-19 emergency," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    17. Sina Mohri, Seyed & Ghaderi, Hadi & Nassir, Neema & Thompson, Russell G., 2023. "Crowdshipping for sustainable urban logistics: A systematic review of the literature," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    18. Bursa, Bartosz & Mailer, Markus & Axhausen, Kay W., 2022. "Travel behavior on vacation: transport mode choice of tourists at destinations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 234-261.
    19. Tang, Hongyu & Feng, Tao, 2026. "Modeling heterogeneous individual choices for multi-person household MaaS bundles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    20. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:173:y:2025:i:c:s0967070x25003397. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.