IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp996-1011.html

Monitoring and evaluation of travel behaviour change in mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) trials: Insights from a longitudinal study

Author

Listed:
  • Ali, Nazam
  • Sagmanli, Seda Sucu
  • Ouelhadj, Djamila
  • Dadashzadeh, Nima
  • Woods, Lee
  • Fletcher, Graham

Abstract

Travel behaviour change towards more sustainable modes of transport is required to achieve environmental sustainability. Mobility as a Service (MaaS) trials have been implemented in various cities over the past decade to reduce private car usage, and promote sustainability. Monitoring and evaluation (M&E) is a key component in developing MaaS trials, as it enables a comprehensive understanding and analysis of the MaaS's impact on modal shift. Although the insights from various MaaS trials have been explored in the literature, studies on the travel behaviour change M&E of these trials with longitudinal approaches were lacking. This paper proposes a M&E approach employing the Differences-in-Differences (DiD) method and incorporating three Key Performance Indicators (KPIs), to monitor and evaluate the travel behaviour change after the launch of the MaaS app. It uses longitudinal (baseline and recall) data to analyse the impact of MaaS on travel behaviour change for its users compared to non-users. The application of the proposed DiD-based M&E framework has been tested and validated on a real-world MaaS project with 887 MaaS users and 757 non-MaaS users. The results suggest that the private car use is reduced while public transport use increased for MaaS users, while for the non-MaaS users, the private car use is increased and public transport is decreased. Moreover, the DiD analysis showed that the impact of MaaS on the decrease in the private car and increase in public transport use is statistically significant. These findings and insights guide policymakers and transport practitioners in appraising the effectiveness of new MaaS systems, especially in car-dependent regions in the world.

Suggested Citation

  • Ali, Nazam & Sagmanli, Seda Sucu & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Dadashzadeh, Nima & Woods, Lee & Fletcher, Graham, 2025. "Monitoring and evaluation of travel behaviour change in mobility-as-a-service (MaaS) trials: Insights from a longitudinal study," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 996-1011.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:996-1011
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.020
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002732
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.020?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Henning, Theunis F.P. & Muruvan, Sugandree & Feng, Wanhua A. & Dunn, Roger C., 2011. "The development of a benchmarking tool for monitoring progress towards sustainable transportation in New Zealand," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 480-488, March.
    2. Dadashzadeh, Nima & Woods, Lee & Ouelhadj, Djamila & Thomopoulos, Nikolas & Kamargianni, Maria & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2022. "Mobility as a Service Inclusion Index (MaaSINI): Evaluation of inclusivity in MaaS systems and policy recommendations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 191-202.
    3. Manaugh, Kevin & Badami, Madhav G. & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2015. "Integrating social equity into urban transportation planning: A critical evaluation of equity objectives and measures in transportation plans in North America," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 167-176.
    4. Ho, Chinh Q. & Hensher, David A. & Mulley, Corinne & Wong, Yale Z., 2018. "Potential uptake and willingness-to-pay for Mobility as a Service (MaaS): A stated choice study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 302-318.
    5. Jelke Bethlehem, 2010. "Selection Bias in Web Surveys," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 78(2), pages 161-188, August.
    6. Storme, Tom & De Vos, Jonas & De Paepe, Leen & Witlox, Frank, 2020. "Limitations to the car-substitution effect of MaaS. Findings from a Belgian pilot study," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 196-205.
    7. Lin, Tao & Wang, Donggen & Zhou, Meng, 2018. "Residential relocation and changes in travel behavior: what is the role of social context change?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 360-374.
    8. Brög, Werner & Erl, Erhard & Ker, Ian & Ryle, James & Wall, Rob, 2009. "Evaluation of voluntary travel behaviour change: Experiences from three continents," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 16(6), pages 281-292, November.
    9. Lechner, Michael, 2011. "The Estimation of Causal Effects by Difference-in-Difference Methods," Foundations and Trends(R) in Econometrics, now publishers, vol. 4(3), pages 165-224, November.
    10. Ho, Chinh Q. & Mulley, Corinne & Hensher, David A., 2020. "Public preferences for mobility as a service: Insights from stated preference surveys," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 70-90.
    11. Nicola Dempsey & Glen Bramley & Sinéad Power & Caroline Brown, 2011. "The social dimension of sustainable development: Defining urban social sustainability," Sustainable Development, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 19(5), pages 289-300, September.
    12. Lyons, Glenn & Hammond, Paul & Mackay, Kate, 2019. "The importance of user perspective in the evolution of MaaS," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 22-36.
    13. Kevin Manaugh & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2012. "What makes travel 'local': Defining and understanding local travel behaviour," The Journal of Transport and Land Use, Center for Transportation Studies, University of Minnesota, vol. 5(3), pages 15-27.
    14. Shaheen, Susan & Cohen, Adam, 2020. "Chapter 3 - Mobility on demand (MOD) and mobility as a service (MaaS): early understanding of shared mobility impacts and public transit partnerships," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt5030f0cd, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    15. Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q. & Reck, Daniel J., 2021. "Corrigendum to “Mobility as a service and private car use: Evidence from the sydney MaaS trial” [Transp. Res. Part A 145 (2021) 17–33]," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-226.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ran Du & Fumitaka Kurauchi & Toshiyuki Nakamura & Masahiro Kuwahara, 2025. "Assessing Regional Public Transport Evaluation Indicators for Advanced Mobility Systems: A Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(19), pages 1-37, October.

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nikitas, Alexandros & Cotet, Corneliu & Vitel, Alexandra-Elena & Nikitas, Nikolaos & Prato, Carlo, 2024. "Transport stakeholders’ perceptions of Mobility-as-a-Service: A Q-study of cultural shift proponents, policy advocates and technology supporters," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    2. Kayikci, Yasanur & Kabadurmus, Ozgur, 2022. "Barriers to the adoption of the mobility-as-a-service concept: The case of Istanbul, a large emerging metropolis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 219-236.
    3. Lopez-Carreiro, Iria & Monzon, Andres & Lopez-Lambas, Maria E., 2021. "Comparison of the willingness to adopt MaaS in Madrid (Spain) and Randstad (The Netherlands) metropolitan areas," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 275-294.
    4. Ho, Chinh Q. & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and the role of multimodality in the sustainability of urban mobility in developing and developed countries," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 145(C), pages 161-176.
    5. Ho, Chinh Q., 2022. "Can MaaS change users’ travel behaviour to deliver commercial and societal outcomes?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 76-97.
    6. Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q. & Reck, Daniel J., 2021. "Corrigendum to “Mobility as a service and private car use: Evidence from the sydney MaaS trial” [Transp. Res. Part A 145 (2021) 17–33]," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 226-226.
    7. Iria Lopez-Carreiro & Andres Monzon & Elena Lopez, 2023. "MaaS Implications in the Smart City: A Multi-Stakeholder Approach," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(14), pages 1-27, July.
    8. Alyavina, Elena & Nikitas, Alexandros & Njoya, Eric Tchouamou, 2024. "Mobility-as-a-Service and unsustainable travel behaviour: Exploring the car ownership and public transport trip replacement side-effects of the MaaS paradigm," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 53-70.
    9. Kim, Eui-Jin & Kim, Youngseo & Jang, Sunghoon & Kim, Dong-Kyu, 2021. "Tourists’ preference on the combination of travel modes under Mobility-as-a-Service environment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 236-255.
    10. Georgina Santos & Nikolay Nikolaev, 2021. "Mobility as a Service and Public Transport: A Rapid Literature Review and the Case of Moovit," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(7), pages 1-18, March.
    11. Benjamin Maas, 2022. "Literature Review of Mobility as a Service," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(14), pages 1-28, July.
    12. Xi, Haoning & Liu, Wei & Waller, S. Travis & Hensher, David A. & Kilby, Philip & Rey, David, 2023. "Incentive-compatible mechanisms for online resource allocation in Mobility-as-a-Service systems," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 119-147.
    13. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2025. "The role of intermodality and environmental consciousness in the preferences for MaaS bundles: A hybrid choice modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    14. Lopez-Carreiro, Iria & Monzon, Andres & Lopez, Elena & Lopez-Lambas, Maria Eugenia, 2020. "Urban mobility in the digital era: An exploration of travellers' expectations of MaaS mobile-technologies," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 63(C).
    15. Claudia Caballini & Maria Vittoria Corazza & Valentina Costa & Ilaria Delponte & Erika Olivari, 2022. "Assessing the Feasibility of MaaS: A Contribution from Three Italian Case Studies," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(24), pages 1-15, December.
    16. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2023. "Exploring the aspects of MaaS adoption based on college students’ preferences," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 113-125.
    17. Yao, Enjian & Hao, He & Pan, Long & Chen, Rongsheng & Wang, Yue & Xiao, Hui, 2025. "Investigating the willingness of shifting to MaaS in one-trip scenarios: Insights from comparative stated surveys," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Gillian Harrison & Astrid Gühnemann & Simon Shepherd, 2020. "The Business Case for a Journey Planning and Ticketing App—Comparison between a Simulation Analysis and Real-World Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(10), pages 1-21, May.
    19. Reck, Daniel J. & Hensher, David A. & Ho, Chinh Q., 2020. "MaaS bundle design," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 485-501.
    20. Bushell, James & Merkert, Rico & Beck, Matthew J., 2022. "Consumer preferences for operator collaboration in intra- and intercity transport ecosystems: Institutionalising platforms to facilitate MaaS 2.0," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 160-178.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:996-1011. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.