IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp821-837.html

Dependence or preference? Navigating public transit loyalty across heterogeneous levels of transit dependence

Author

Listed:
  • Asgharpour, Sina
  • Askari, Sajad
  • Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros)

Abstract

The remarkable decline in transit ridership in recent years, further exacerbated by the COVID-19 pandemic, has compelled transit agencies to enhance rider satisfaction to retain transit users. However, the adoption of general policies may be ineffective due to the heterogeneous nature of user perceptions that shape transit loyalty. Specifically, service quality factors might vary markedly among captive riders and those who prefer to use transit, including choice riders and voluntary riders. In this study, we investigated the transit dependence-based segmentation in the analysis of transit satisfaction and loyalty. Employing survey data from Chicago Transit Authority (CTA) riders collected in 2022, we aimed to: (1) examine the significance of heterogeneity in transit satisfaction and loyalty across captive, choice, and voluntary riders, and (2) assess the implications of overall approach versus dependence-based segmentation approach. We developed a Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Model (PLS-SEM) and conducted Permutation Multi-group Analysis (PMGA) to assess the hypothesized heterogeneity among three rider groups. Additionally, we introduced Importance-Performance Deviation Index (IPDI) to rank the service quality aspects for improvement policies specific to each group. The proposed metric highlights the variations of prioritized factors for improvement across rider groups. Our analysis reveals that while cleanliness is the most unsatisfactory aspect for all rider groups, choice riders exhibit more dissatisfaction with cleanliness. Further, reliability, particularly in terms of waiting times and service arrivals, does not meet voluntary riders’ expectations. Moreover, comfort factors are critically unsatisfactory for captive riders, especially at stations and in-vehicle, compared to other two rider groups. These findings showcase the ramifications of adopting general policies instead of group-specific strategies. The study provides transit agencies with actionable insights to develop informed and targeted retention strategies, ultimately enhancing transit users’ satisfaction and loyalty.

Suggested Citation

  • Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Dependence or preference? Navigating public transit loyalty across heterogeneous levels of transit dependence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 821-837.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:821-837
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002562
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Khatun, Farzana & Saphores, Jean-Daniel, 2023. "Covid-19, intentions to change modes, and how they materialized - Results from a random survey of Californians," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    2. Jonas De Vos & Patrick A. Singleton & Tommy Gärling, 2022. "From attitude to satisfaction: introducing the travel mode choice cycle," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 204-221, March.
    3. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & Nguyen, Teron & Ngoc Su, Diep & Thi Le, Phuong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "How do social cues from other passengers affect word-of-mouth and intention to continue using bus services? A second-order SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 302-320.
    4. Hao Ding & Anastasia Loukaitou-Sideris & Jacob L. Wasserman, 2022. "Homelessness on public transit: A review of problems and responses," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(2), pages 134-156, March.
    5. Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Ho-Mai, Nhi Thao & Truong, Thi Minh & Nguyen, Minh Hieu & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2024. "The role of physical and social environments on the loyalty toward urban rail services: A consideration of stations and onboard," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 328-344.
    6. Dea van Lierop & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2018. "What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 52-72, January.
    7. Cheranchery, Munavar Fairooz & Ansari, Fathima & Ali, Mubarak, 2024. "Is customized bus service for commuter segments the need of the hour? An integrated IPA-machine learning framework to redefine commuter segments based on quality expectations," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 16-25.
    8. Cheah, Jun-Hwa & Amaro, Suzanne & Roldán, José L., 2023. "Multigroup analysis of more than two groups in PLS-SEM: A review, illustration, and recommendations," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    9. Fu, Xuemei & Juan, Zhicai, 2017. "Exploring the psychosocial factors associated with public transportation usage and examining the “gendered” difference," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 103(C), pages 70-82.
    10. Cheranchery, Munavar Fairooz & Maitra, Bhargab, 2018. "Investigating perception of captive and choice riders for formulating service standards of ordinary and premium buses in Indian cities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 89-96.
    11. Sun, Shichao & Zhou, Linlin & Wang, Pingye & Zhang, Hui, 2024. "Unraveling the inconsistency in captive riders’ behaviors and attitudes within public transportation service usage: An integrated modeling approach," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 105(C).
    12. Shiftan, Yoram & Outwater, Maren L. & Zhou, Yushuang, 2008. "Transit market research using structural equation modeling and attitudinal market segmentation," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(3), pages 186-195, May.
    13. Weng, JianCheng & Yu, JiangBo & Di, XiaoJian & Lin, PengFei & Wang, Jing-Jing & Mao, Li-Zeng, 2023. "How does the state of bus operations influence passengers’ service satisfaction? A method considering the differences in passenger preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    14. Tuan, Vu Anh & Van Truong, Nguyen & Tetsuo, Shimizu & An, Nguyen Ngoc, 2022. "Public transport service quality: Policy prioritization strategy in the importance-performance analysis and the three-factor theory frameworks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 118-134.
    15. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "Understanding public transport satisfaction: Using Maslow's hierarchy of (transit) needs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-94.
    16. van Lierop, Dea & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2016. "Enjoying loyalty: The relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction, and behavioral intentions in public transit," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 59(C), pages 50-59.
    17. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2018. "Modelling service-specific and global transit satisfaction under travel and user heterogeneity," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 509-528.
    18. Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Who stays loyal to transit? Understanding preference-based heterogeneity in service satisfaction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    19. Erhardt, Gregory D. & Hoque, Jawad Mahmud & Goyal, Vedant & Berrebi, Simon & Brakewood, Candace & Watkins, Kari E., 2022. "Why has public transit ridership declined in the United States?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 68-87.
    20. Zhang, Chunqin & Liu, Yong & Lu, Weite & Xiao, Guangnian, 2019. "Evaluating passenger satisfaction index based on PLS-SEM model: Evidence from Chinese public transport service," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 149-164.
    21. Ziedan, Abubakr & Lima, Luiz & Brakewood, Candace, 2023. "A multiple mediation analysis to untangle the impacts of COVID-19 on nationwide bus ridership in the United States," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    22. Matthew Palm & Jeff Allen & Yixue Zhang & Ignacio Tiznado-Aitken & Brice Batomen & Steven Farber & Michael Widener, 2024. "Facing the future of transit ridership: shifting attitudes towards public transit and auto ownership among transit riders during COVID-19," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(2), pages 645-671, April.
    23. Tyrinopoulos, Yannis & Antoniou, Constantinos, 2008. "Public transit user satisfaction: Variability and policy implications," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 15(4), pages 260-272, July.
    24. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Ratchaphong Lieophairot & Nuttawut Rojniruttikul & Singha Chaveesuk, 2025. "Factors Influencing Rail Service Passenger Loyalty Among Older Thai Adults," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(18), pages 1-26, September.
    2. Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Who stays loyal to transit? Understanding preference-based heterogeneity in service satisfaction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Who stays loyal to transit? Understanding preference-based heterogeneity in service satisfaction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. Li, Zhi-Chun & Ma, Zhenni & Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Fu, Xiaowen, 2025. "Influential factors and passenger satisfaction towards integrated urban-rural bus services: A case study of Chibi, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    3. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Aghajanzadeh, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2022. "Has COVID-19 changed our loyalty towards public transport? Understanding the moderating role of the pandemic in the relationship between service quality, customer satisfaction and loyalty," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 80-103.
    4. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    5. Nilsson, Jonas & Jansson, Johan & Nicholas, Kimberly & Zhao, Chunli, 2025. "Traveler perceived service quality and satisfaction with public transport: The influence of digital competence and environmental attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    6. Wei Chiang Chan & Wan Hashim Wan Ibrahim & May Chiun Lo & Mohamad Kadim Suaidi & Shiaw Tong Ha, 2020. "Sustainability of Public Transportation: An Examination of User Behavior to Real-Time GPS Tracking Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    7. Yang, Min & Wang, Zheyuan & Cheng, Long & Chen, Enhui, 2022. "Exploring satisfaction with air-HSR intermodal services: A Bayesian network analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 69-89.
    8. de Oña, Juan, 2021. "Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: A cross-country analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 129-149.
    9. Luo, Shuli & He, Sylvia Y. & Grant-Muller, Susan & Song, Linqi, 2023. "Influential factors in customer satisfaction of transit services: Using crowdsourced data to capture the heterogeneity across individuals, space and time," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 173-183.
    10. Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Abrari Vajari, Mohammad & De Gruyter, Chris, 2020. "Importance – Performance Analysis (IPA) of bus service attributes: A case study in a developing country," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 129-150.
    11. Dea Lierop & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2018. "Is having a positive image of public transit associated with travel satisfaction and continued transit usage? An exploratory study of bus transit," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 10(2), pages 241-256, August.
    12. Weng, JianCheng & Yu, JiangBo & Di, XiaoJian & Lin, PengFei & Wang, Jing-Jing & Mao, Li-Zeng, 2023. "How does the state of bus operations influence passengers’ service satisfaction? A method considering the differences in passenger preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    13. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    14. Henriquez-Jara, Bastian & Arriagada, Jacqueline & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2025. "Impact of real-time information on passenger satisfaction across varying public transport quality levels in 13 Chilean cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Mandhani, Jyoti & Nayak, Jogendra Kumar & Parida, Manoranjan, 2020. "Interrelationships among service quality factors of Metro Rail Transit System: An integrated Bayesian networks and PLS-SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 320-336.
    16. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Sitti Asmah Hassan & Ahmad Firdhaus Arham & Sharizal Hashim, 2023. "Modelling of Passenger Satisfaction and Reuse Intention with Monorail Services in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A Hybrid SEM-ANN Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    17. Eugene Sogbe & Susilawati Susilawati & Tan Chee Pin, 2025. "Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    18. Guan, Xiaodong & Wang, Donggen, 2024. "Examining the roles of transport captivity and travel dissonance in travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    19. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    20. Juan de Oña, 2022. "Service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions towards public transport from the point of view of private vehicle users," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 237-269, February.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:821-837. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.