IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp487-496.html

Party politics in transport policy with a large language model

Author

Listed:
  • Yun, Hyunsoo
  • Lee, Eun Hak

Abstract

Given the significant influence of lawmakers' political ideologies on legislative decision-making, analyzing their impact on transportation-related policymaking is of critical importance. This study introduces a novel framework that integrates a large language model (LLM) with explainable artificial intelligence (XAI) to analyze transportation-related legislative proposals. Legislative bill data from South Korea's 21st National Assembly were used to identify key factors shaping transportation policymaking. These include political affiliations and sponsor characteristics. The LLM was employed to classify transportation-related bill proposals through a stepwise filtering process based on keywords, sentences, and contextual relevance. XAI techniques were then applied to examine the relationships between political party affiliation and associated attributes. The results revealed that the number and proportion of conservative and progressive sponsors, along with district size and electoral population, were critical determinants shaping legislative outcomes. These findings suggest that both parties contributed to bipartisan legislation through different forms of engagement, such as initiating or supporting proposals. This integrated approach offers a valuable tool for understanding legislative dynamics and guiding future policy development, with broader implications for infrastructure planning and governance.

Suggested Citation

  • Yun, Hyunsoo & Lee, Eun Hak, 2025. "Party politics in transport policy with a large language model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 487-496.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:487-496
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X2500246X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. McAndrews, Carolyn & Marcus, Justine, 2015. "The politics of collective public participation in transportation decision-making," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 537-550.
    2. Nicholas J. Klein & Kelcie Ralph & Calvin Thigpen & Anne Brown, 2022. "Political Partisanship and Transportation Reform," Journal of the American Planning Association, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 88(2), pages 163-178, April.
    3. Chikaraishi, Makoto & Garg, Prateek & Varghese, Varun & Yoshizoe, Kazuki & Urata, Junji & Shiomi, Yasuhiro & Watanabe, Ryuki, 2020. "On the possibility of short-term traffic prediction during disaster with machine learning approaches: An exploratory analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 98(C), pages 91-104.
    4. Renae Marshall & Matthew G. Burgess, 2022. "Correction to: Advancing bipartisan decarbonization policies: lessons from state-level successes and failures," Climatic Change, Springer, vol. 172(3), pages 1-1, June.
    5. Jacob S. Hacker & Paul Pierson, 2019. "Policy Feedback in an Age of Polarization," The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, , vol. 685(1), pages 8-28, September.
    6. Lee, Eun Hak, 2024. "eXplainable DEA approach for evaluating performance of public transport origin-destination pairs," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 108(C).
    7. Zhang, Siyao & Fu, Daocheng & Liang, Wenzhe & Zhang, Zhao & Yu, Bin & Cai, Pinlong & Yao, Baozhen, 2024. "TrafficGPT: Viewing, processing and interacting with traffic foundation models," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 95-105.
    8. Sciara, Gian-Claudia & Waxman, Andrew & Buchanan, Ross, 2024. "State legislator views on funding 21st century Transportation:Important problems, missed connections," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 206-218.
    9. Chen, Qi & Tang, Yuhui & Lu, Bo, 2024. "Exploring the evolution trends of port integration policy in China by a text mining approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 153(C), pages 159-172.
    10. Legacy, Crystal & Stone, John, 2019. "Consensus planning in transport: The case of Vancouver’s transportation plebiscite," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 120(C), pages 295-305.
    11. Christiansen, Petter, 2018. "Public support of transport policy instruments, perceived transport quality and satisfaction with democracy. What is the relationship?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 118(C), pages 305-318.
    12. Hilary Nixon & Asha Weinstein Agrawal, 2019. "Would Americans pay more in taxes for better transportation? Answers from seven years of national survey data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 819-840, June.
    13. Zou, Pengyu & Zhang, Bin & Yi, Yi & Wang, Zhaohua, 2024. "How does travel satisfaction affect preference for shared electric vehicles? An empirical study using large-scale monitoring data and online text mining," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 146(C), pages 59-71.
    14. Jin, Jiahuan & Ma, Mingyu & Jin, Huan & Cui, Tianxiang & Bai, Ruibin, 2023. "Container terminal daily gate in and gate out forecasting using machine learning methods," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 163-174.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Citations

    Citations are extracted by the CitEc Project, subscribe to its RSS feed for this item.
    as


    Cited by:

    1. Lee, Eun Hak & Kim, Eui-Jin & Jeong, Jonghwa, 2026. "Senior safety zones protect older adults from traffic crashes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 175(C).

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Adam Millard-Ball & Purva Kapshikar, 2024. "How land use patterns keep driving cheap: Geographic support for transportation taxes," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(7), pages 1345-1370, May.
    2. Axsen, Jonn & Wolinetz, Michael, 2021. "Taxes, tolls and ZEV zones for climate: Synthesizing insights on effectiveness, efficiency, equity, acceptability and implementation," Energy Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C).
    3. Young, Mischa & Tanguay, Georges A. & MacDonald, Adriane & Zhou, Ying & Giordano, Angelina, 2025. "Navigating municipal dynamics: unraveling the political threads in Canadian transport decarbonization policies," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 128-139.
    4. Christiansen, Petter, 2020. "The effects of transportation priority congruence for political legitimacy," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 61-76.
    5. Dian Nostikasari & Nicole Foster & Lauren Krake, 2024. "Inhabiting digital spaces: An informational right to the city for mobility justice," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 61(13), pages 2585-2602, October.
    6. Hu, Songhua & Xiong, Chenfeng & Ji, Ya & Wu, Xin & Liu, Kailun & Schonfeld, Paul, 2024. "Understanding factors influencing user engagement in incentive-based travel demand management program," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    7. Hu, Lingqian & Schneider, Robert J. & Chakraborty, Tathagato, 2025. "Reformed planning process for transport justice: The experiment of FlexRide Milwaukee," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 198-206.
    8. McCullough, Sarah R. PhD & van Stokkum, Rebecca PhD, 2021. "Answers from the Margins: Participatory Planning with Disadvantaged Communities," Institute of Transportation Studies, Working Paper Series qt0w49r6g5, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Davis.
    9. Xiaoqing Dai & Han Qiu & Lijun Sun, 2021. "A Data-Efficient Approach for Evacuation Demand Generation and Dissipation Prediction in Urban Rail Transit System," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(17), pages 1-15, August.
    10. Ekinci, Esra & Mangla, Sachin Kumar & Kazancoglu, Yigit & Sarma, P.R.S. & Sezer, Muruvvet Deniz & Ozbiltekin-Pala, Melisa, 2022. "Resilience and complexity measurement for energy efficient global supply chains in disruptive events," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    11. Xue, Mengtian & Zhang, Bin & Chen, Siyuan & Zhao, Yuandong & Wang, Zhaohua, 2024. "How does extreme temperature affect shared travel? Evidence from bike-sharing order flow in China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 118(C).
    12. Muhamad Rizki & Muhammad Zudhy Irawan & Puspita Dirgahayani & Prawira Fajarindra Belgiawan & Retno Wihanesta, 2022. "Low Emission Zone (LEZ) Expansion in Jakarta: Acceptability and Restriction Preference," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-22, September.
    13. Polzin, Steven E. & Batur, Irfan & Pendyala, Ram M., 2025. "Sustaining the relevance of transportation planning and forecasting in a fast-changing world," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 168(C), pages 279-287.
    14. Morton, Craig & Mattioli, Giulio & Anable, Jillian, 2021. "Public acceptability towards Low Emission Zones: The role of attitudes, norms, emotions, and trust," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 150(C), pages 256-270.
    15. Paddeu, Daniela & Parkhurst, Graham & Rosenberg, Ges & Carhart, Neil & Taylor, Colin, 2024. "Promoting sustainable urban freight through stakeholder engagement to co-create decarbonisation pathways in the UK," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 104(C).
    16. Sui, Cong & Wang, Shuhan & Zheng, Wei, 2024. "Sentiment as a shipping market predictor: Testing market-specific language models," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    17. Zhou, Zhen & Gu, Ziyuan & Qu, Xiaobo & Liu, Pan & Liu, Zhiyuan & Yu, Wenwu, 2024. "Urban mobility foundation model: A literature review and hierarchical perspective," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    18. Paddeu, Daniela, 2025. "Decarbonising last-mile deliveries: When the national strategy fails to meet local needs and expectations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 195(C).
    19. Lu, Peng & Nie, Shizhao, 2019. "The strength distribution and combined duration prediction of online collective actions: Big data analysis and BP neural networks," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 535(C).
    20. Johan Rose Santos & Nur Diana Safitri & Maya Safira & Varun Varghese & Makoto Chikaraishi, 2021. "Road network vulnerability and city-level characteristics: A nationwide comparative analysis of Japanese cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(5), pages 1091-1107, June.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:487-496. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.