IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp157-170.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Yuling
  • Ma, Hanxi
  • Zhou, Jiangping

Abstract

The paradigm shift in urban development from government-dominated planning and construction to multiparty collaborative governance has underscored the importance of public-private sector relationships in enhancing accessibility. While existing scholarships have examined accessibility through the lens of land use and transportation arrangements, little attention has been paid to whether and how public-private collaboration governs accessibility outcomes. To date, three key gaps remain: (1) how the distinct behaviors of public and private sectors contribute to accessibility, (2) whether these behaviors constitute meaningful collaboration, and (3) how the intensity of collaboration influences accessibility outcomes. This study revisits accessibility through the framework of public-private collaborative governance, examining the roles of both sectors in shaping accessibility and assessing how their collaboration intensity affects outcomes. Using a longitudinal case study of metro-land use development in Hong Kong, we find that among different planning approaches for coordinating land use and transit infrastructure, the form and intensity of public-private collaboration play a significant role in accessibility enhancement. Key mechanisms for effective collaboration include: (1) aligning public and private interests in accessibility planning to ensure effective engagement, (2) integrating public planning authority with private capital and expertise to implement solutions, and (3) coordinating strategies to build trust and accelerate integrated land use-transportation development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Yuling & Ma, Hanxi & Zhou, Jiangping, 2025. "Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 157-170.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:157-170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002227
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:157-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.