IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp157-170.html

Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong

Author

Listed:
  • Yang, Yuling
  • Ma, Hanxi
  • Zhou, Jiangping

Abstract

The paradigm shift in urban development from government-dominated planning and construction to multiparty collaborative governance has underscored the importance of public-private sector relationships in enhancing accessibility. While existing scholarships have examined accessibility through the lens of land use and transportation arrangements, little attention has been paid to whether and how public-private collaboration governs accessibility outcomes. To date, three key gaps remain: (1) how the distinct behaviors of public and private sectors contribute to accessibility, (2) whether these behaviors constitute meaningful collaboration, and (3) how the intensity of collaboration influences accessibility outcomes. This study revisits accessibility through the framework of public-private collaborative governance, examining the roles of both sectors in shaping accessibility and assessing how their collaboration intensity affects outcomes. Using a longitudinal case study of metro-land use development in Hong Kong, we find that among different planning approaches for coordinating land use and transit infrastructure, the form and intensity of public-private collaboration play a significant role in accessibility enhancement. Key mechanisms for effective collaboration include: (1) aligning public and private interests in accessibility planning to ensure effective engagement, (2) integrating public planning authority with private capital and expertise to implement solutions, and (3) coordinating strategies to build trust and accelerate integrated land use-transportation development.

Suggested Citation

  • Yang, Yuling & Ma, Hanxi & Zhou, Jiangping, 2025. "Revisit accessibility via governance of public-private collaboration: A case study in Hong Kong," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 157-170.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:157-170
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002227
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.06.003?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Alex Anas & Richard Arnott & Kenneth A. Small, 1998. "Urban Spatial Structure," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 36(3), pages 1426-1464, September.
    2. Yang, Jiawen & Chen, Junxian & Le, Xiaohui & Zhang, Qin, 2016. "Density-oriented versus development-oriented transit investment: Decoding metro station location selection in Shenzhen," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 51(C), pages 93-102.
    3. Tang, Siman & Lo, Hong K., 2008. "The impact of public transport policy on the viability and sustainability of mass railway transit - The Hong Kong experience," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(4), pages 563-576, May.
    4. Erik-Hans Klijn & Geert R. Teisman, 2003. "Institutional and Strategic Barriers to Public—Private Partnership: An Analysis of Dutch Cases," Public Money & Management, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 23(3), pages 137-146, July.
    5. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2010. "Cambridge Handbook of Strategy as Practice," Post-Print hal-02298145, HAL.
    6. Cervero, Robert & Murakami, Jin, 2008. "Rail + Property Development: A model of sustainable transit finance and urbanism," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6jx3k35x, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    7. Stephen P. Osborne, 2006. "The New Public Governance?-super-1," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 8(3), pages 377-387, September.
    8. Zhang, Wei & Zhang, Xinxin & Wu, Guangdong, 2021. "The network governance of urban renewal: A comparative analysis of two cities in China," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    9. Foth, Nicole & Manaugh, Kevin & El-Geneidy, Ahmed M., 2013. "Towards equitable transit: examining transit accessibility and social need in Toronto, Canada, 1996–2006," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 29(C), pages 1-10.
    10. Erik-Hans Klijn & Geert R. Teisman, 2005. "Public-private partnerships as the management of co-production: strategic and institutional obstacles in a difficult marriage," Chapters, in: Graeme A. Hodge & Carsten Greve (ed.), The Challenge of Public–Private Partnerships, chapter 6, Edward Elgar Publishing.
    11. Damon Golsorkhi & Linda Rouleau & David Seidl & Eero Vaara, 2010. "Cambridge handbook of strategy as practic," Post-Print hal-00578622, HAL.
    12. Rianne Warsen & José Nederhand & Erik Hans Klijn & Sanne Grotenbreg & Joop Koppenjan, 2018. "What makes public-private partnerships work? Survey research into the outcomes and the quality of cooperation in PPPs," Public Management Review, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 20(8), pages 1165-1185, August.
    13. Jones, Peter & Lucas, Karen, 2012. "The social consequences of transport decision-making: clarifying concepts, synthesising knowledge and assessing implications," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 21(C), pages 4-16.
    14. Daniel Chatman & Robert Noland, 2011. "Do Public Transport Improvements Increase Agglomeration Economies? A Review of Literature and an Agenda for Research," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 31(6), pages 725-742.
    15. Tabea S Sonnenschein & Simon Scheider & Siqi Zheng, 2022. "The rebirth of urban subcenters: How subway expansion impacts the spatial structure and mix of amenities in European cities," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 49(4), pages 1266-1282, May.
    16. repec:bla:pmomgt:v:23:y:2003:i:3:p:137-146 is not listed on IDEAS
    17. Darja Reuschke, 2001. "Public-Private Partnerships in Urban Development in the United States," NEURUS papers neurusp13, NEURUS - Network of European and US Regional and Urban Studies.
    18. Cervero, Robert & Landis, John, 1997. "Twenty years of the Bay Area Rapid Transit system: Land use and development impacts," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 31(4), pages 309-333, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Lin, Joanne Yuh-Jye & Jenelius, Erik & Cebecauer, Matej & Rubensson, Isak & Chen, Cynthia, 2023. "The equity of public transport crowding exposure," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    2. Jingming Liu & Xianhui Hou & Chuyu Xia & Xiang Kang & Yujun Zhou, 2021. "Examining the Spatial Coordination between Metrorail Accessibility and Urban Spatial Form in the Context of Big Data," Land, MDPI, vol. 10(6), pages 1-20, May.
    3. Kaplan, Sigal & Popoks, Dmitrijs & Prato, Carlo Giacomo & Ceder, Avishai (Avi), 2014. "Using connectivity for measuring equity in transit provision," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 37(C), pages 82-92.
    4. Eeva Aromaa & Päivi Eriksson, 2014. "Management of Innovation in Small Service Companies," South Asian Journal of Business and Management Cases, , vol. 3(1), pages 31-40, June.
    5. Nazari Adli, Saeid & Donovan, Stuart, 2018. "Right to the city: Applying justice tests to public transport investments," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 56-65.
    6. Albana Berisha Qehaja & Enver Kutllovci & Justina Shiroka Pula, 2017. "Strategic Management Tools and Techniques Usage: a Qualitative Review," Acta Universitatis Agriculturae et Silviculturae Mendelianae Brunensis, Mendel University Press, vol. 65(2), pages 585-600.
    7. Tan, Ronghui & He, Qingsong & Zhou, Kehao & Xie, Peng, 2019. "The effect of new metro stations on local land use and housing prices: The case of Wuhan, China," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 79(C), pages 1-1.
    8. Chang, Zheng & Phang, Sock-Yong, 2017. "Urban rail transit PPPs: Lessons from East Asian cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 105(C), pages 106-122.
    9. Sarah Kaplan, 2011. "Strategy and PowerPoint: An Inquiry into the Epistemic Culture and Machinery of Strategy Making," Organization Science, INFORMS, vol. 22(2), pages 320-346, April.
    10. Yang, Jiawen & Su, Pinren & Cao, Jason, 2020. "On the importance of Shenzhen metro transit to land development and threshold effect," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 99(C), pages 1-11.
    11. Sharifiasl, Seyedsoheil & Kharel, Subham & Pan, Qisheng & Li, Jianling, 2024. "Assessing the impact of transit accessibility on employment density: A spatial analysis of gravity-based accessibility incorporating job matching, transit service types, and first/last mile modes," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    12. Miquel-Àngel García-López, 2010. "The Accessibility City. When Transport Infrastructure Matters in Urban Spatial Structure," Working Papers XREAP2010-01, Xarxa de Referència en Economia Aplicada (XREAP), revised Feb 2010.
    13. Wang, Shuxian & Zhao, Liyuan & Li, Zhi-Chun & Liang, Sicheng, 2024. "Simulation of land use changes by capturing the different impacts of rail transit in both mother city and new towns," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 125-137.
    14. Ahmed El-Geneidy & Ron Buliung & Ehab Diab & Dea van Lierop & Myriam Langlois & Alexander Legrain, 2016. "Non-stop equity: Assessing daily intersections between transit accessibility and social disparity across the Greater Toronto and Hamilton Area (GTHA)," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 43(3), pages 540-560, May.
    15. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 2018. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 20(3), pages 627-645, June.
    16. Yingying Ma & Zhuojun Liu & Shuguang Shen, 2020. "Public-Private or Master-Servant? Examining the Implementation of the Serious Disease Insurance Scheme in China," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 17(5), pages 1-15, February.
    17. Lin, Jen-Jia & Yang, Shu-Han, 2019. "Proximity to metro stations and commercial gentrification," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 77(C), pages 79-89.
    18. Kristof Van Assche & Martijn Duineveld & Monica Gruezmacher & Raoul Beunen, 2021. "Steering as Path Creation: Leadership and the Art of Managing Dependencies and Reality Effects," Politics and Governance, Cogitatio Press, vol. 9(2), pages 369-380.
    19. Zhaojun Yang & Jun Sun & Yali Zhang & Ying Wang, 0. "Peas and carrots just because they are green? Operational fit between green supply chain management and green information system," Information Systems Frontiers, Springer, vol. 0, pages 1-19.
    20. Jangik Jin & Danya Kim, 2018. "Expansion of the subway network and spatial distribution of population and employment in the Seoul metropolitan area," Urban Studies, Urban Studies Journal Limited, vol. 55(11), pages 2499-2521, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:157-170. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.