IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/trapol/v171y2025icp1041-1049.html

Every Stop Counts: Evaluating the impact of a new penalty amendment for non-yielding drivers on reducing road traffic injuries and deaths in Taiwan

Author

Listed:
  • Hsu, Cheng-Kai
  • Wang, Bonnie S.
  • Lo, Hsuan
  • Chen, Chin-Wei

Abstract

Pedestrian safety remains a critical concern worldwide, particularly in motorcycle-dominant settings such as Taiwan, where failure to yield the right-of-way to pedestrians is a prevalent issue. In response to growing public concerns over pedestrian safety, the Taiwan government implemented stricter monetary penalties for drivers failing to yield to pedestrians on June 30, 2023, representing a major legislative change aimed at deterring unsafe driving behavior, improving compliance with traffic laws, and fostering a more pedestrian-friendly road culture. This study evaluates whether this major legislative change has achieved its intended goals by examining its impact on the frequency and severity of road traffic incidents. Using a quasi-experimental study design, we found that the policy led to a gradual decline in incident frequency but an immediate reduction in crash severity. Its effect on incident frequency was particularly pronounced for pedestrian-involved crashes, with injury risks decreasing by approximately 11% for both car-to-pedestrian (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.92) and motorcycle-to-pedestrian crashes (RR = 0.89; 95% CI: 0.86, 0.91). In contrast, the likelihood of fatal outcomes dropped more sharply, with a 40% reduction observed across all crashes (RR = 0.60; 95 % CI: 0.42, 0.85). Our findings suggest that drivers may have quickly adapted their driving patterns to comply with the policy, reducing fatalities among crashes that did occur, while the slower decline in incident frequency likely reflects the time needed for broader behavioral changes, such as improved yielding, attentiveness, and rule adherence, to become routine. Notably, the policy's impact on reducing severity was stronger under low-visibility road conditions such as poorly lit settings, underscoring its particular effectiveness in mitigating risks in challenging driving scenarios. The findings underscore the importance of targeted legislative actions, such as stricter penalties, as an effective approach to promoting yielding behavior and enhancing pedestrian safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Hsu, Cheng-Kai & Wang, Bonnie S. & Lo, Hsuan & Chen, Chin-Wei, 2025. "Every Stop Counts: Evaluating the impact of a new penalty amendment for non-yielding drivers on reducing road traffic injuries and deaths in Taiwan," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 1041-1049.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:1041-1049
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.021
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0967070X25002744
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tranpol.2025.07.021?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ioannis Laliotis & Giuseppe Moscelli & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2023. "Summertime and the drivin’ is easy? Daylight saving time and vehicle accidents," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(10), pages 2192-2215, October.
    2. Ioannis Laliotis & Giuseppe Moscelli & Vassilis Monastiriotis, 2023. "Summertime and the drivin’ is easy? Daylight saving time and vehicle accidents," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 32(10), pages 2192-2215, October.
    3. Maria De Paola & Vincenzo Scoppa & Mariatiziana Falcone, 2013. "The deterrent effects of the penalty points system for driving offences: a regression discontinuity approach," Empirical Economics, Springer, vol. 45(2), pages 965-985, October.
    4. Catherine Hausman & David S. Rapson, 2018. "Regression Discontinuity in Time: Considerations for Empirical Applications," Annual Review of Resource Economics, Annual Reviews, vol. 10(1), pages 533-552, October.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Depalo, Domenico, 2023. "Should the Daylight Saving Time be abolished? Evidence from work accidents in Italy," Economic Modelling, Elsevier, vol. 128(C).
    2. Stefano Castriota & Mirco Tonin, 2023. "Stay or flee? Hit-and-run accidents, darkness and probability of punishment," European Journal of Law and Economics, Springer, vol. 55(1), pages 117-144, February.
    3. Nower, Michael, 2024. "Losing sleep at the international market: Daylight Saving Time and exchange rates," Economics Letters, Elsevier, vol. 241(C).
    4. Richard Bronk & Wade Jacoby, 2020. "The epistemics of populism and the politics of uncertainty," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 152, European Institute, LSE.
    5. Gerard Delanty, 2020. "Six political philosophies in search of a virus: Critical perspectives on the coronavirus pandemic," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 156, European Institute, LSE.
    6. Bob Hancke & Toon Van Overbeke & Dustin Voss, 2021. "Similar but different? Comparing economic policy responses to the Corona Crisis in the UK and Germany," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 165, European Institute, LSE.
    7. Tobias Tesche, 2020. "The European Union's response to the coronavirus emergency: an early assessment," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 157, European Institute, LSE.
    8. Dimitry Kochenov, 2020. "Genuine Purity of Blood: The 2019 Report on Investor Citizenship and Residence in the European Union and its Litigious Progeny," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 164, European Institute, LSE.
    9. Nina Lopez Uroz, 2020. "Populism Amidst Prosperity: Poland's Growth Model and its Socio-Political Outcomes," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 159, European Institute, LSE.
    10. Silvia Bruzzone & Stefano Castriota & Mirco Tonin, 2021. "Points Or Prison? The Effects Of Different Sanctions On Driving Behavior," Contemporary Economic Policy, Western Economic Association International, vol. 39(1), pages 126-140, January.
    11. Mitchell Orenstein & Bojan Bugaric, 2020. "Populism Amidst Prosperity: Work, Family, Fatherland: The Political Economy of Populism in Central and Eastern Europe," LEQS – LSE 'Europe in Question' Discussion Paper Series 163, European Institute, LSE.
    12. Lorenzo Codogno & Paul Noord, 2022. "Assessing Next Generation EU," Springer Proceedings in Business and Economics, in: Luigi Paganetto (ed.), Economic Challenges for Europe After the Pandemic, pages 59-82, Springer.
    13. Rebollo-Sanz, Yolanda & Rodríguez-López, Jesús & Rodríguez-Planas, Núria, 2021. "Penalty-point system, deterrence and road safety: A quasi-experimental analysis," Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, Elsevier, vol. 190(C), pages 408-433.
    14. Wright, Nicholas A. & Dorilas, Ernest, 2022. "Do Cellphone Bans Save Lives? Evidence From Handheld Laws on Traffic Fatalities," Journal of Health Economics, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    15. Fry, Jane M., 2023. "Do increased speeding fines save lives?," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 34(C).
    16. Roberto Gillmore, 2025. "Daylight Saving Time and Automobile Accidents: Evidence From Chile," Health Economics, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., vol. 34(5), pages 880-931, May.
    17. KAMKOUM, Arnaud Cedric, 2023. "The Federal Reserve’s Response to the Global Financial Crisis and its Effects: An Interrupted Time-Series Analysis of the Impact of its Quantitative Easing Programs," Thesis Commons d7pvg, Center for Open Science.
    18. Shamsuddin, Mrittika & Acosta, Pablo A. & Schwengber, Rovane Battaglin & Fix, Jedediah & Pirani, Nikolas, 2022. "The Labor Market Impacts of Venezuelan Refugees and Migrants in Brazil," IZA Discussion Papers 15384, Institute of Labor Economics (IZA).
    19. Arne Henningsen & Guy Low & David Wuepper & Tobias Dalhaus & Hugo Storm & Dagim Belay & Stefan Hirsch, 2024. "Estimating Causal Effects with Observational Data: Guidelines for Agricultural and Applied Economists," IFRO Working Paper 2024/03, University of Copenhagen, Department of Food and Resource Economics.
    20. Lou, Jiehong & Shen, Xingchi & Niemeier, Deb, 2020. "Are stay-at-home orders more difficult to follow for low-income groups?," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 89(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:trapol:v:171:y:2025:i:c:p:1041-1049. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/30473/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.