IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transb/v25y1991i2-3p127-141.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Deadweight loss in highway toll collection

Author

Listed:
  • Seila, Andrew F.
  • Wilson, Paul W.

Abstract

This paper examines the deadweight loss from collecting tolls on congested highways. Although this problem has been recognized in the literature, no attempt has been made to systematically examine the problem. Four economic models for commuter behavior associated with waiting at a toll booth were developed and analyzed. These models include (1) no tolls and no waiting, (2) tolls with no waiting, (3) waiting with no tolls, and (4) waiting with tolls. The results indicate that under quite reasonable circumstances, it may be optimal to not collect tolls if their collection requires that free-flowing traffic be stopped. In cases where traffic forms a queue because of a bottleneck, tolls may provide small welfare gains, but if toll collection creates waste in the form of administrative costs or rent-seeking behavior, the optimal solution may again be to not charge tolls.

Suggested Citation

  • Seila, Andrew F. & Wilson, Paul W., 1991. "Deadweight loss in highway toll collection," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 25(2-3), pages 127-141.
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:25:y:1991:i:2-3:p:127-141
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/0191-2615(91)90019-F
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:25:y:1991:i:2-3:p:127-141. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.