Author
Listed:
- Zhang, Yuqin
- Ma, Ke
- Xu, Zhigang
- Zhou, Hang
- Ma, Chengyuan
- Li, Xiaopeng
Abstract
Empirical studies have indicated that automated vehicle (AV) automakers tend to prioritize mobility over stability in designing car-following (CF) models, which may raise safety concerns. A likely explanation for this issue is that hardware-induced response delays challenge the ability of the CF models, as designed by automakers, to maintain an equilibrium between stability and mobility. To address these concerns, this study proposes a modeling methodology for the CF model in AVs aimed at achieving a trade-off between stability and mobility. This methodology seeks to identify the optimal parameters that enhance mobility under stability constraints. First, the linear CF model is calibrated using data from 20 commercial AVs produced by multiple automakers, and the unique response delay values of the linear CF model for each AV are identified. Next, the parameter regions ensuring stability are derived theoretically based on the calibrated response delays for each AV. An optimal mobility objective function is constructed to minimize time headway and reaction time, with the boundaries of the stable parameter regions serving as constraints. It allows the selection of CF parameters that maximize mobility while remaining within the stable regions. This proposed modeling method is applied to all AVs, and the optimal parameters are tested in simulations. Simulation results demonstrate that the proposed optimal model effectively dampens oscillations, reduces safety risks, and maintains shorter spacing, thus achieving an ideal trade-off between stability and mobility for AVs.
Suggested Citation
Zhang, Yuqin & Ma, Ke & Xu, Zhigang & Zhou, Hang & Ma, Chengyuan & Li, Xiaopeng, 2025.
"A modeling methodology for car-following behaviors of automated vehicles: Trade-off between stability and mobility,"
Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transb:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0191261525001651
DOI: 10.1016/j.trb.2025.103316
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transb:v:200:y:2025:i:c:s0191261525001651. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/548/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.