IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v95y2017icp227-237.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Digesting the safety effectiveness of cable barrier systems by numbers

Author

Listed:
  • Chimba, Deo
  • Ruhazwe, Evarist
  • Allen, Steve
  • Waters, Jim

Abstract

This paper presents median cable barrier safety effectiveness by numbers as experienced on Tennessee highways. Apart from descriptive statistics and parametric tests, before and after statistical evaluation utilizing Empirical Bayes (EB) was used to estimate the cable barriers Safety Effectiveness. The findings from the descriptive statistics, paired t-test and EB evaluation were very similar which reinforces the positive safety effectiveness performances of the cable barriers in Tennessee. The study found that the statewide cable barriers Safety Effectiveness (statistical percentage change in crash frequency across all statewide cable barrier segments) for fatal crashes is 94%, incapacitating injury crashes is 92% and fatal and incapacitating injury crashes combined is also 92%. The safety effectiveness for fatal and all injury crashes combined was found to be 85%. In a direct comparison through descriptive statistics, statewide fatal crashes were reduced by 82% after the cable barriers installation while the incapacitating injury crashes were reduced by 76%. In addition, head-on crashes went down by 96% and crashes involving two or more vehicles went down by 92%. Fatalities due to median crossover crashes were reduced by 83% while number of people injured went down by 71% as a result of cable barriers. Through modeling, wider cable offsets and inside shoulders were found to help reduce number of median related crashes while high differential elevations and high posted speed limit segments significantly had higher number of crashes compared to the opposite features. The findings can be used by state transportation agencies as a decision tool when considering installation of median cable barriers as well in determination geometry and traffic factors that play role in enhancing or worsening performance of the median cable barriers.

Suggested Citation

  • Chimba, Deo & Ruhazwe, Evarist & Allen, Steve & Waters, Jim, 2017. "Digesting the safety effectiveness of cable barrier systems by numbers," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 95(C), pages 227-237.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:95:y:2017:i:c:p:227-237
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.013
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856415302524
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2016.11.013?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:95:y:2017:i:c:p:227-237. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.