IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v42y2008i6p857-873.html
   My bibliography  Save this article

Queuing simulation of roadside survey station: Blocked traffic lane

Author

Listed:
  • Songchitruksa, Praprut
  • Hard, Edwin N.

Abstract

External station travel surveys provide critical inputs to travel demand models. The results from these models are frequently used for statewide planning purposes. Although a roadside survey is very effective in obtaining useful information from road users, its major drawback is the excessive delay that is imposed onto road users particularly on high-volume facilities. In this paper, we used a discrete event simulation to model a blocked traffic lane survey, which is usually conducted for two-lane undivided highways. This type of survey station requires a complete stop of all oncoming traffic. Non-surveyed traffic has no ability to go around and thus has to wait in a queue in order to proceed through the survey station. Road users' impacts are quantified in terms of delay and queue length while the performance of surveyors is measured by the number of surveys completed per unit time. Sensitivity analyses of simulation inputs reveal that simulation results are fairly insensitive to selected parameters. The results in this study provide a quick and useful guideline that roadside surveyors can use to estimate the road user impacts prior to the survey and to plan the survey procedure accordingly.

Suggested Citation

  • Songchitruksa, Praprut & Hard, Edwin N., 2008. "Queuing simulation of roadside survey station: Blocked traffic lane," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 42(6), pages 857-873, July.
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:42:y:2008:i:6:p:857-873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965-8564(08)00018-9
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to search for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:42:y:2008:i:6:p:857-873. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.