IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v213y2026ics0965856426003423.html

A decision-support framework for selecting new energy bus technologies: Assessing battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses

Author

Listed:
  • Sadrani, Mohammad
  • Giagnorio, Mirko
  • Tirachini, Alejandro

Abstract

New energy bus (NEB) technologies, including battery electric buses (BEBs) and hydrogen fuel cell buses (FCBs), offer pathways to support decarbonisation strategies in public transport. Selecting the most suitable technology represents a multi-dimensional decision problem encompassing trade-offs across different criteria. This paper provides a comprehensive review of the factors influencing the choice of BEBs or FCBs, grouped into technological, economic, managerial, social, environmental, and institutional categories. We address this NEB technology selection problem using a hybrid multi-criteria decision-making framework integrating the Best-Worst Method (BWM) and the Measurement of Alternatives and Ranking according to Compromise Solution (MARCOS). Evaluation criteria are identified and refined through a structured expert interview process, and their weights are determined using BWM based on assessments from 34 international experts with diverse backgrounds. The MARCOS method is applied to evaluate and rank NEB alternatives, including BEBs, FCBs, and mixed fleet configurations. Results indicate that economic factors (e.g., vehicle, energy, and infrastructure costs) are the most influential, followed by institutional (e.g., political will and funding) and technological (e.g., driving range and energy system resilience) dimensions. BEBs are identified as the most suitable option for current urban systems, while FCBs remain competitive where operational flexibility is critical. Interestingly, a divergence is observed between academic and industry perspectives, with the former prioritising economic and environmental factors, whereas the latter prioritise institutional and technological factors. This is also reflected in the ranking of alternatives, with academics favouring BEBs and industry experts favouring FCBs, highlighting the importance of incorporating stakeholder perspectives into decision-making.

Suggested Citation

  • Sadrani, Mohammad & Giagnorio, Mirko & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2026. "A decision-support framework for selecting new energy bus technologies: Assessing battery electric and hydrogen fuel cell buses," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003423
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105201
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426003423
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105201?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003423. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.