IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v213y2026ics0965856426003411.html

A design-of-designs survey framework to analyze information processing strategies in choice experiments

Author

Listed:
  • Soto, Jose J.
  • Cherchi, Elisabetta
  • Ortúzar, Juan de Dios
  • Rizzi, Luis I.

Abstract

This study introduces a novel design-of-designs survey framework tailored to model decision-making processes involving the presence of alternative choice heuristics. Often based solely on a utility maximization framework, traditional choice models fail to account for the diverse heuristics that individuals may employ when faced with varying task complexity and choice contexts. The design-of-designs framework allows capturing potential alternative heuristics by systematically varying task complexity along meta-dimensions such as the number of alternatives, attributes, and choice contexts in different transport-related choices (of route, holiday destination, and residential location).

Suggested Citation

  • Soto, Jose J. & Cherchi, Elisabetta & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios & Rizzi, Luis I., 2026. "A design-of-designs survey framework to analyze information processing strategies in choice experiments," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003411
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105200
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426003411
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105200?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003411. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.