Author
Listed:
- Huang, Jingyu
- Pervez, Amjad
- Qu, Xingda
- Zhang, Tingru
Abstract
Urban Air Mobility (UAM) is emerging as a promising solution to urban congestion and emissions, yet its large-scale deployment depends on public acceptance. Existing evidence on UAM acceptance and its determinants remains fragmented and inconsistent. To address this gap, we systematically reviewed 30 empirical studies published between 2021 and 2025 and synthesized 253 effect sizes using a three-level meta-analytic model. Results indicate a modestly positive public attitude toward UAM (M = 0.62 on a –2 to +2 scale), reflecting initial social recognition despite UAM’s early stage. Determinants were grouped into individual, perceptual, and societal levels. At the individual level, personal innovativeness and environmental norm showed strong positive effects, highlighting the roles of innovation propensity and pro-environmental values among early adopters. Among perceptual factors, socioemotional variables including trust and enjoyment exerted stronger effects than instrumental factors such as perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Social influence, representing a societal factor, also emerged as a critical predictor. These findings suggest that UAM acceptance is more strongly associated emotional values and social recognition rather than with rational evaluations. This challenges traditional utility-based models of technology adoption. The study provides theoretical insights into technology adoption and practical implications for policymakers and industry to promote UAM acceptance.
Suggested Citation
Huang, Jingyu & Pervez, Amjad & Qu, Xingda & Zhang, Tingru, 2026.
"Flying into the future: A systematic review and meta-analysis of urban air mobility acceptance and its determinants,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003393
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105198
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003393. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.