IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v213y2026ics0965856426003356.html

The 15-minute neighbourhood and housing affordability: insights from Los Angeles

Author

Listed:
  • Kasraian, Dena
  • Kurihara, Emma
  • Imani, Ahmadreza Faghih
  • Rous, Tom
  • de Nazelle, Audrey

Abstract

The 15-minute neighbourhood is a planning concept that aims to address urban environmental, health and social challenges by enabling residents to meet their daily needs within a 15-minute walk or cycle. While widely promoted, equity concerns have emerged regarding 15-minute neighbourhood transitions, particularly the tension between livability and accessibility gains and housing affordability protection. This work addresses two gaps in the existing 15-minute city literature. First, it presents empirical evidence on the relationship between local accessibility and housing affordability; second, it provides actionable guidance on how to ensure that interventions balance accessibility gains with affordability protection to promote just transitions that actively address, rather than exacerbate, existing inequalities. To assess the potential for 15-minute neighbourhoods to contribute to just transitions towards sustainable and healthy urban environments, we evaluate linkages between 15-minute neighbourhood status and affordable housing in Los Angeles county which faces a growing unhoused population alongside rising rent and home values. Informed by a literature review, we apply a scoring methodology that accounts for access and choice to different categories of amenities to assess 15-minute neighbourhood status, which we compare against different housing affordability metrics using geospatial analysis. Findings reveal a weak but positive correlation between 15-minute neighbourhood scores and affordable housing availability. Notably, residents of affordable housing in Los Angeles often have relatively high access to amenities traditionally perceived as less accessible to low-income populations, such as green spaces and grocery stores. Our findings suggest that cities may be able to pursue proximity-based planning without inherently exacerbating inequities, provided that affordability is explicitly considered. Beyond our immediate empirical findings, our proposal to jointly evaluate affordability and 15-minute neighbourhood scores, as well as the resulting neighbourhood typology and suggested interventions offer a practical approach to help cities support a just transition to affordable 15-minute neighbourhoods. This approach is especially relevant for other car-dependent metropolitan regions that are promoting proximity-based planning while facing affordability challenges.

Suggested Citation

  • Kasraian, Dena & Kurihara, Emma & Imani, Ahmadreza Faghih & Rous, Tom & de Nazelle, Audrey, 2026. "The 15-minute neighbourhood and housing affordability: insights from Los Angeles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003356
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105194
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426003356
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105194?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003356. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.