IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v213y2026ics0965856426003320.html

Value versus cost in post-experience robotaxi use: evidence from a cognitive–affective–conative model

Author

Listed:
  • Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy
  • Wu, Feng-Yan
  • Thi Nguyen, Thao Phuong
  • Su, Diep Ngoc
  • Luu, Tuan Trong
  • Li, Zhi-Chun

Abstract

Recent advances in autonomous driving have accelerated the deployment of robotaxi services, positioning them as a key component of future urban mobility. However, existing research has largely emphasized pre-adoption intentions, offering limited insight into users’ post-experience evaluations and continued usage behavior in fully driverless contexts. To address this gap, this study examines how perceived value and perceived risk, conceptualised as higher-order constructs, are jointly associated with continued usage intention toward robotaxi services in China. Guided by the cognitive–affective–conative (CAC) framework, perceived value and perceived risk are conceptualized as multidimensional cognitive evaluations formed through actual usage experiences. Based on survey data collected from 409 users with real-world robotaxi experience in Wuhan, China, the study employs structural equation modeling to investigate how these cognitive evaluations shape affective responses, including positive emotion, negative emotion, and satisfaction and, in turn, continued usage intention. The results show that perceived value is strongly associated with higher post-experience positive emotion and satisfaction, which in turn are positively related to continued usage intention, with satisfaction emerging as the strongest direct predictor. In contrast, perceived risk is primarily associated with higher post-experience negative emotion, while its associations with satisfaction and continued usage intention remain weak. This suggests that positive affective and evaluative mechanisms play a more dominant role in sustaining usage than cost-related concerns. By extending the CAC framework to post-experience robotaxi usage, this study deepens the understanding of continued usage behavior in autonomous mobility and offers practical implications for enhancing user acceptance and supporting the large-scale deployment of robotaxi services in China.

Suggested Citation

  • Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Wu, Feng-Yan & Thi Nguyen, Thao Phuong & Su, Diep Ngoc & Luu, Tuan Trong & Li, Zhi-Chun, 2026. "Value versus cost in post-experience robotaxi use: evidence from a cognitive–affective–conative model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 213(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003320
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105191
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426003320
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105191?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:213:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003320. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.