IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v212y2026ics0965856426003265.html

How can public concerns shape eVTOL policy design? A knowledge graph-enhanced large language model (LLM) framework

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Tianlin
  • Yang, Cheng
  • Chung, Hyungchul
  • Zhu, Manman
  • Han, Ke
  • Ding, Hongliang

Abstract

Electric vertical take-off and landing aircraft (eVTOL) may provide faster and more flexible connections for intracity and intercity trips, but their adoption depends on more than aircraft performance. Although prior studies have examined eVTOL acceptance and potential demand, the link between behavioral evidence and policy design remains underdeveloped. Using stated preference survey data from six Chinese low-altitude mobility pilot cities, covering a 30-km intracity setting and intercity settings at 60, 100, 160, and 300 km, we first construct a three-layer causal network to examine how individual characteristics, psychological attitudes, and travel-scenario attributes jointly shape eVTOL mode choice. The results show that travel cost, waiting time, and ground access/egress distance constrain eVTOL adoption, whereas perceived convenience, perceived usefulness, income, and congestion experience increase adoption potential; network analysis further identifies income and perceived usefulness as key leverage points in the decision system. Building on these behavioral findings, we develop a knowledge graph-enhanced large language model (KG-enhanced LLM) framework that integrates causal evidence and literature-based knowledge to translate the identified concerns into policy recommendations. A comparative experiment shows that the KG-enhanced LLM produces recommendations with higher evidence reliability, scenario relevance, logical coherence, and overall quality than a standalone LLM. Guided by these findings, the study recommends that eVTOL deployment prioritize transparent safety governance, accessible pricing, door-to-door integration, and differentiated communication across user groups. The study thus advances a structured approach for linking public acceptance analysis with policy design and offers methodological implications for emerging mobility systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Tianlin & Yang, Cheng & Chung, Hyungchul & Zhu, Manman & Han, Ke & Ding, Hongliang, 2026. "How can public concerns shape eVTOL policy design? A knowledge graph-enhanced large language model (LLM) framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003265
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105185
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426003265
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105185?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003265. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.