Author
Listed:
- Wu, Wanting
- Li, Hongchang
- Wang, Jianda
- Wang, Kun
Abstract
Since 2000, China has significantly increased investment in railway infrastructure, particularly following the 2009 financial crisis. However, the effectiveness of such investment in improving railway efficiency has not been thoroughly assessed. To this end, this study uses a three-stage DEA model to evaluate the PFP and TFP of 18 railway bureaus from 2009 to 2020, analyzing the impact of infrastructure investment on railway efficiency across regions of China. Furthermore, a LightGBM regression model is employed to identify the key infrastructure factors influencing railway efficiency. We find that infrastructure investment significantly alleviates environmental heterogeneity and reduces efficiency disadvantages across regions. Efficiency improvements are primarily driven by network scale effects, as infrastructure expansion enhances network connectivity and enables railway operations to approach more efficient production scales. Moreover, the marginal efficiency gains from infrastructure investment are markedly stronger in low-efficiency regions, where infrastructure constraints are more binding. Feature importance analysis also reveals heterogeneous effects across different types of infrastructure inputs. Basic infrastructure components, including bridges, tunnels, and stations, play a dominant role in improving efficiency in low-efficiency regions, whereas infrastructure upgrading, particularly electrification and seamless tracks, has a greater impact in high-efficiency regions. These findings highlight the importance of differentiated infrastructure investment strategies, prioritizing network connectivity improvements in lagging regions while emphasizing infrastructure upgrading in more developed areas to promote balanced efficiency development within the railway sector.
Suggested Citation
Wu, Wanting & Li, Hongchang & Wang, Jianda & Wang, Kun, 2026.
"Impact of infrastructure investment on Chinese railway efficiency,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003204
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105179
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003204. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.