Author
Listed:
- Chen, Junjie
- Lin, Yuming
- Yu, Jianghao
- Du, Jianbang
- Liu, Pei
Abstract
Hydrogen bike-sharing is an emerging mode of zero-carbon transport that has recently appeared in some cities. However, salient empirical research remains insufficient, and it is thus unclear how to effectively increase residents’ adoption intention. This study draws on innovation diffusion theory (IDT) to develop a model of the determinants of hydrogen bike-sharing adoption intention, including innovation attributes, social system, communication channels, time, and external environment characteristics. Using data collected from 5,220 residents across 302 cities in China, we employed LightGBM to train and test the model. The results of this model combined with Shapley additive explanations (SHAP) are threefold. (i) In terms of relative importance, the relative advantage of innovation, social system, communication channels, and the external environment are important, whereas the importance of time is limited. (ii) Most determinants exhibit pronounced nonlinear and threshold effects. Particularly, price and maximum riding range reveal a diminishing marginal effect of relative advantage, with adoption intention increasing once they outperform conventional bike-sharing options but rising more slowly as the advantage further expands. (iii) Interaction effects between external environmental characteristics and key IDT factors are observed. The role of price as an economic relative advantage varies with the level of hydrogen infrastructure, while the performance relative advantage of maximum riding range varies across urban areas. These findings provide decision makers and practitioners with more targeted strategies for accelerating the transition toward zero-carbon transport.
Suggested Citation
Chen, Junjie & Lin, Yuming & Yu, Jianghao & Du, Jianbang & Liu, Pei, 2026.
"Exploring the determinants of hydrogen bike-sharing adoption among urban residents using explainable machine learning,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003150
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105174
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426003150. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.