IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v212y2026ics0965856426002880.html

Evaluating urban rail transit vulnerability: A link-centric framework integrating network connectivity and passenger accessibility

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Yun
  • Yang, Rufan
  • Xiang, Yunqiao
  • Yuan, Mingfang
  • Zhou, Yu
  • Yan, Xuedong
  • Chen, Xing

Abstract

Understanding how disruptions reshape network structure and generate heterogeneous accessibility losses is essential for vulnerability assessment in urban rail transit (URT) systems. This study develops a unified link-centric framework that jointly examines disruption-induced structural changes and passenger accessibility consequences under multi-scenario settings. Disruption scenarios are constructed using an interval-based representation that captures structural dependencies under turn-back constraints, ensuring realistic propagation patterns. Passenger impacts are evaluated through an OD-level accessibility classification based on feasible paths and detour thresholds, distinguishing unaffected, partially affected, and fully affected OD pairs. These components are integrated through a composite link-importance indicator that couples network topology with demand distribution, enabling identification of structurally critical and functionally consequential links. The framework links structural fragility with passenger outcomes, supporting more realistic identification of critical links based on structural dependency and accessibility loss. Application to the Beijing URT network shows that vulnerability is concentrated in the southwestern corridor, particularly along the Fangshan Line and southern Line 9, where disruptions cause significant accessibility losses. Targeted structural interventions effectively mitigate impacts, as adding a connection in the vulnerable corridor reduces fully affected OD pairs from 10,565 to 2,470. Sensitivity analysis confirms the stability of identified vulnerable regions under different penalty factors, while validation in Shenzhen and Nanchang demonstrates the framework’s transferability across systems with varying sizes, topologies, and demand patterns. This study provides a unified, demand-sensitive framework linking structural disruptions with accessibility outcomes, offering practical guidance for resilience-oriented URT planning and emergency management.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Yun & Yang, Rufan & Xiang, Yunqiao & Yuan, Mingfang & Zhou, Yu & Yan, Xuedong & Chen, Xing, 2026. "Evaluating urban rail transit vulnerability: A link-centric framework integrating network connectivity and passenger accessibility," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002880
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105147
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426002880
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105147?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002880. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.