IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v212y2026ics0965856426002764.html

Exploring ranked preferences for different autonomous vehicle transport options using a hybrid rank-ordered logit model

Author

Listed:
  • Chiu, Bing-Yu
  • Chen, Ching-Fu

Abstract

Public acceptance of autonomous vehicles (AVs) varies by vehicle type and user demographics, underscoring the need for appropriate policies and infrastructure to ensure AVs contribute effectively to sustainable transportation. Most existing research examining the factors associated with public acceptance of AVs focuses on one type such as privately owned AVs or shared AVs, overlooking preferences across ownership, public transit, and shared mobility. This study employs Multiple Indicators Multiple Causes and Hybrid Rank-Ordered Logit models to investigate the effects of latent variables on preferences toward multiple AV-based travel modes in Taiwan. Results show that preferences are shaped more strongly by sociodemographic characteristics, generational cohort, and information exposure than by income alone. Generational differences are particularly pronounced. Gender differences further underscore the importance of deploying AV strategies in a differentiated manner. Education level and employment status provide additional insights relevant to equity. Existing travel behavior plays a more nuanced role. One of the most policy-relevant contributions of this study concerns the role of information environments. The intensity of media consumption matters as much as the medium itself. Implications for the sustainable development of on-demand and automated mobility services include: AV deployment strategies should be differentiated by population segment and service type, rather than assuming homogeneous acceptance of automation; policies should explicitly address concerns related to social comfort, trust, and perceived safety in a targeted way; equity considerations call for balancing private AV ownership models with shared and publicly oriented services to avoid reinforcing social selectivity in access to automated mobility.

Suggested Citation

  • Chiu, Bing-Yu & Chen, Ching-Fu, 2026. "Exploring ranked preferences for different autonomous vehicle transport options using a hybrid rank-ordered logit model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002764
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105135
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426002764
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105135?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002764. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.