Author
Listed:
- Agrawal, Shubham
- Van Fossen, Jenna A.
- Schuster, Amy M.
- Mack, Elizabeth A.
- Cotten, Shelia R.
- Chang, Chu-Hsiang
Abstract
The adoption of automated vehicles (AVs) is poised to transform driving jobs across the transportation sector. While drivers are aware of AV developments, their attitudes toward AVs and perceptions of AV impacts on their industry vary. It is crucial to understand whether drivers’ perceptions of AVs inform their willingness to train to match drivers’ needs and characteristics with effective workforce development programs for mitigating job displacement and supporting a smooth labor transition. This study analyzed data from a nationwide survey of truck, gig (ride-hailing and delivery services), and taxi drivers to investigate the relationship between drivers’ perceptions of AVs and willingness to train given AV adoption. Using latent profile analysis, we identified three driver profiles (Reluctant Acceptors, Enthusiasts, and Cautious Endorsers) based on their views of AVs, perceptions of how driver responsibilities would change with AVs, predictions of the AV adoption timeline, and anticipated changes in their industry’s workforce size if AVs are adopted. Enthusiasts reported a higher income than Cautious Endorsers. Significant differences were found in drivers’ willingness to participate in three types of training (paid on-the-job, free outside of the company, self-paid) across the three profiles. Enthusiasts were more willing to self-pay for training, while Reluctant Acceptors were more willing to participate in paid-on-the-job training. These findings provide insights into nuances in workers’ willingness to train based on who is paying for training and their perceptions of AVs.
Suggested Citation
Agrawal, Shubham & Van Fossen, Jenna A. & Schuster, Amy M. & Mack, Elizabeth A. & Cotten, Shelia R. & Chang, Chu-Hsiang, 2026.
"Professional drivers’ perceptions of automated vehicles and willingness to train for AV integration: a latent profile analysis,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002727
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105131
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:212:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002727. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.