Author
Listed:
- Ma, Wenfei
- Huang, Yunping
- Zheng, Nan
- Pan, Tianlu
- Zhong, Renxin
Abstract
The macroscopic fundamental diagram (MFD) provides an efficient framework for characterizing network traffic dynamics. Recent studies have underscored the importance of quantifying MFD hysteresis and explicitly distinguishing congestion loading and recovery phases for traffic control. Yet, no systematic calibration method has been proposed to accurately capture the traffic dynamics across distinct congestion phases and quantify the associated uncertainty. This study proposes a unified mathematical program for MFD calibration and uncertainty quantification that automatically distinguishes congestion loading and recovery. Specifically, the program first incorporates two conventional quantification principles as special cases and is validated using microscopic simulations based on two real-world urban networks in China, thereby demonstrating its effectiveness in characterizing MFD data scatter. Motivated by observed MFD hysteresis, we then extend this unified program to develop a novel uncertainty quantification approach that explicitly captures the distinct congestion loading and recovery dynamics. The results show that the quantified upper and lower bounds correspond to congestion loading and recovery phases, respectively, and that their distance can be interpreted as an indicator of congestion-induced capacity drop. We further examine how macroscopic factors, such as travel demand and traffic control, and microscopic factors, such as driving behavior, influence MFD hysteresis and traffic resilience. The results suggest that demand management and well-designed traffic control can alleviate hysteresis and enhance network resilience, while more homogeneous driving behavior may further improve network performance.
Suggested Citation
Ma, Wenfei & Huang, Yunping & Zheng, Nan & Pan, Tianlu & Zhong, Renxin, 2026.
"Calibration and uncertainty quantification of macroscopic fundamental diagrams,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002685
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105127
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002685. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.