IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v211y2026ics0965856426002570.html

Bridging the digital divide in urban mobility: a latent class choice analysis of older adults’ preferences for autonomous vehicles in China

Author

Listed:
  • Liu, Zhiwei
  • Lin, Zimeng
  • Liu, Jianrong

Abstract

As China experiences rapid population aging, ensuring inclusive and sustainable mobility for older adults has become a pressing policy concern. Autonomous vehicles (AVs) offer the potential to enhance mobility independence, yet their adoption among older adults remains uneven due to heterogeneous psychological dispositions and digital capability constraints, particularly in app-mediated AV systems. This study examines how digital capabilities and behavioral mechanisms jointly shape older adults’ preferences for private and shared AVs, using a hybrid modeling framework. A mixed-mode survey of 996 older adults in Wuhan, China was conducted, combining a stated preference experiment, Theory of Planned Behavior (TPB) indicators, and a five-domain digital capability scale aligned with DigComp. A sequential hybrid approach was applied: latent psychological constructs were first estimated using Structural Equation Modeling and subsequently incorporated into a Latent Class Choice Model (LCCM) to capture unobserved preference heterogeneity. The results identify two distinct segments. A public-transport-preferring group (54.82%) exhibits strong cost and time sensitivity, limited AV experience, and lower procedural digital skills, while an AV-preferring group (45.18%) shows higher baseline propensity toward AVs, greater willingness to pay for time savings, and stronger capabilities in communication and content creation. Behavioral intention and perceived behavioral control are robust predictors of AV choice, whereas subjective norms exert a consistently negative influence and trust in automation does not emerge as a stable driver once usability and capability constraints are considered. Elasticity and willingness-to-pay estimates further reveal that price-based interventions are most effective for the transit-preferring segment, whereas time and convenience improvements drive responses among AV-preferring users. These findings highlight the importance of segment-specific AV policies, emphasizing simplified access and targeted pricing for digitally constrained users, and service-quality and usability improvements for digitally proficient older adults.

Suggested Citation

  • Liu, Zhiwei & Lin, Zimeng & Liu, Jianrong, 2026. "Bridging the digital divide in urban mobility: a latent class choice analysis of older adults’ preferences for autonomous vehicles in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002570
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105116
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426002570
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105116?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002570. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.