Author
Listed:
- Dong, Xin
- Ventura, Jose
- Gayah, Vikash V.
Abstract
Ride-sharing has the potential to reduce travel costs and VMT by increasing vehicle occupancy. However, fragmentation across competing ride-hailing companies confines shared trips within individual platforms, limiting system-wide efficiency gains. Overcoming this barrier requires fair and incentive-compatible profit allocation mechanisms. This study proposes a profit-aware collaborative framework to evaluate how collaboration under different profit allocation mechanisms influences the feasibility and performance of cross-platform ride-sharing. The proposed framework embeds profit-aware constraints directly into the rider matching process. This allows profit considerations to shape feasible cross-platform matches while ensuring that collaboration remains beneficial for all participating platforms. Within this framework, we evaluate three representative allocation mechanisms—equal-profit-based, market-share-based, and Shapley-value-based—through large-scale simulations calibrated to realistic conditions. Results indicate that collaboration improves system efficiency, including higher share rates, reduced waiting times, and lower VMT. Among the evaluated mechanisms, the Shapley-value-based allocation achieves the most balanced improvements in overall system performance and platform profits. We further find that efficiency gains increase with demand density, reflecting economies of scale (EOS) in shared mobility systems, although marginal benefits diminish as sharing opportunities become saturated. These findings provide quantitative insights into how profit-sharing design can support sustainable cross-platform collaboration and improve urban mobility efficiency in increasingly competitive ride-hailing markets.
Suggested Citation
Dong, Xin & Ventura, Jose & Gayah, Vikash V., 2026.
"Profit-aware graph framework for cross-platform ride-sharing: Analyzing allocation mechanisms and efficiency gains,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002417
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105100
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002417. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.