IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v211y2026ics0965856426002260.html

A quantitative framework for assessing rail station operational resilience under infrastructural modifications

Author

Listed:
  • Haque, Md Tabish
  • Eisold, Jan
  • Bešinović, Nikola

Abstract

Rail stations are essential components in rail networks, influencing operational continuity and urban connectivity. The track and signalling configuration around a station area, where trains arrive and depart, is highly vulnerable to disruptions. Prior research has largely assessed resilience at the network level or the impact of station design on passenger flow; less attention has been paid to the impact of physical track and signalling configurations within the station area on train operations. This study presents an optimisation-based framework that examines the impact of targeted station area infrastructure upgrades on train routing and scheduling during disruptions. The framework evaluates two key performance metrics: the ability to adapt train movements and the stability of scheduled service during disruption. A real-world case study from the German rail network demonstrates the framework’s applicability, supported by sensitivity analysis across disruption and varying operational measure configurations. Results indicate that although resilience is highly sensitive to disruption type and traffic levels, targeted infrastructure modifications can significantly reduce overall impact, operational changes and support faster recovery across diverse disruption scenarios. Further, the study highlights that during severe disruptions involving multiple simultaneous failures, targeted infrastructure modifications continue to have better performance, supporting service continuity. Overall, the findings provide infrastructure managers with a practical basis to strategically prioritise station area upgrades and make resilience-oriented informed decisions.

Suggested Citation

  • Haque, Md Tabish & Eisold, Jan & Bešinović, Nikola, 2026. "A quantitative framework for assessing rail station operational resilience under infrastructural modifications," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 211(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002260
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105085
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426002260
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105085?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:211:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002260. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.