IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v210y2026ics0965856426002053.html

Drivers of trip satisfaction over time: A case study across rapid transit systems in Montreal, Canada

Author

Listed:
  • Carvalho, Thiago
  • El-Geneidy, Ahmed

Abstract

As public transit agencies struggle to win back riders lost during the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding what drives user satisfaction has become critical to retention and ridership recovery. While most research on transit satisfaction relies on cross-sectional data, this paper adopts a longitudinal approach, integrating the hierarchy of transit needs framework to assess whether satisfaction determinants shift over time and across modes using Montreal, Canada, as a case study. Drawing on panel data from the Montreal Mobility Survey, the analysis focuses on 354 rapid transit commuters surveyed in 2023 and 2024, including users of the metro and the newly launched Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems. We estimated mode-specific weighted Bayesian models and compared the relative importance of different factors across hierarchical layers. Results indicate that satisfaction with the metro remains stable and increasingly driven by comfort, while the BRT shows improving satisfaction over time with strong reliance on functional factors such as waiting time. For the LRT, both functional and hedonic attributes play central roles in satisfaction, particularly travel times and information availability. This research highlights the importance of sequencing investments to match service maturity, prioritizing foundational needs, such as service reliability, before higher-order features, and investing early in perception-building strategies for new systems. These results provide empirical evidence on the temporal dynamics of satisfaction and offer guidance for transit agencies on strategies to retain current riders and attract new ones in a post-pandemic context.

Suggested Citation

  • Carvalho, Thiago & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2026. "Drivers of trip satisfaction over time: A case study across rapid transit systems in Montreal, Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002053
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105064
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426002053
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105064?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Xuemei Fu & Zhicai Juan, 2017. "Drivers of transit service loyalty considering heterogeneity between user segments," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 40(5), pages 611-623, July.
    2. Fu, Xue-mei & Zhang, Jiang-hua & Chan, Felix T.S., 2018. "Determinants of loyalty to public transit: A model integrating Satisfaction-Loyalty Theory and Expectation-Confirmation Theory," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 476-490.
    3. Ning Huan & Stephane Hess & Enjian Yao, 2022. "Understanding the effects of travel demand management on metro commuters’ behavioural loyalty: a hybrid choice modelling approach," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(2), pages 343-372, April.
    4. Alan Agresti & Ranjini Natarajan, 2001. "Modeling Clustered Ordered Categorical Data: A Survey," International Statistical Review, International Statistical Institute, vol. 69(3), pages 345-371, December.
    5. Wei-Jaw Deng & Ying-Feng Kuo & Wen-Chin Chen, 2008. "Revised importance--performance analysis: three-factor theory and benchmarking," The Service Industries Journal, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(1), pages 37-51, January.
    6. Erick Calvo & Mario Ferrer, 2018. "Evaluating the quality of the service offered by a bus rapid transit system: the case of Transmetro BRT system in Barranquilla, Colombia," International Journal of Urban Sciences, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 22(3), pages 392-413, July.
    7. Shuli Luo & Sylvia Y He, 2021. "Using data mining to explore the spatial and temporal dynamics of perceptions of metro services in China: The case of Shenzhen," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(3), pages 449-466, March.
    8. Parker, Madeleine E.G. & Li, Meiqing & Bouzaghrane, Mohamed Amine & Obeid, Hassan & Hayes, Drake & Frick, Karen Trapenberg & Rodríguez, Daniel A. & Sengupta, Raja & Walker, Joan & Chatman, Daniel G., 2021. "Public transit use in the United States in the era of COVID-19: Transit riders’ travel behavior in the COVID-19 impact and recovery period," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 53-62.
    9. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "On evasion behaviour in public transport: Dissatisfaction or contagion?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 130(C), pages 626-651.
    10. Soza-Parra, Jaime & Raveau, Sebastián & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Cats, Oded, 2019. "The underlying effect of public transport reliability on users’ satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 83-93.
    11. Tommy Gärling & Kay Axhausen, 2003. "Introduction: Habitual travel choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 30(1), pages 1-11, February.
    12. Dea van Lierop & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2018. "What influences satisfaction and loyalty in public transport? A review of the literature," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 38(1), pages 52-72, January.
    13. Laila Ait Bihi Ouali & Daniel J. Graham & Alexander Barron & Mark Trompet, 2020. "Gender differences in the perception of safety in public transport," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series A, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 183(3), pages 737-769, June.
    14. Nassereddine, M. & Eskandari, H., 2017. "An integrated MCDM approach to evaluate public transportation systems in Tehran," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 106(C), pages 427-439.
    15. Dan Wan & Camille Kamga & Wei Hao & Aaron Sugiura & Eric B. Beaton, 2016. "Customer satisfaction with bus rapid transit: a study of New York City select bus service applying structural equation modeling," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 8(3), pages 497-520, December.
    16. Lai, Wen-Tai & Chen, Ching-Fu, 2011. "Behavioral intentions of public transit passengers--The roles of service quality, perceived value, satisfaction and involvement," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 318-325, March.
    17. Ojeda Diaz, Alfredo J. & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julián, 2023. "Understanding how individuals perceive changes in the built environment and the transport system after implementing a BRT system. The case of Barranquilla, Colombia," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Henriquez-Jara, Bastian & Arriagada, Jacqueline & Tirachini, Alejandro, 2025. "Impact of real-time information on passenger satisfaction across varying public transport quality levels in 13 Chilean cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    19. Weng, JianCheng & Yu, JiangBo & Di, XiaoJian & Lin, PengFei & Wang, Jing-Jing & Mao, Li-Zeng, 2023. "How does the state of bus operations influence passengers’ service satisfaction? A method considering the differences in passenger preferences," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    20. Allen, Jaime & Muñoz, Juan Carlos & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2019. "Understanding public transport satisfaction: Using Maslow's hierarchy of (transit) needs," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 81(C), pages 75-94.
    21. Jaime Allen & Juan Carlos Muñoz & Juan Ortúzar, 2020. "On the effect of operational service attributes on transit satisfaction," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(5), pages 2307-2336, October.
    22. Amirali Soltanpour & Mahmoud Mesbah & Meeghat Habibian, 2020. "Customer satisfaction in urban rail: a study on transferability of structural equation models," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 123-146, March.
    23. Sanusi Ibrahim & Yinggui Zhang & Abdulaziz Ahmad, 2025. "Rail-based public transportation service quality and customer satisfaction: a decade of insights and advances," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 45-69, March.
    24. Saleem, Muhammad Abid & Afzal, Hanan & Ahmad, Farooq & Ismail, Hina & Nguyen, Ninh, 2023. "An exploration and importance-performance analysis of bus rapid transit systems’ service quality attributes: Evidence from an emerging economy," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 1-13.
    25. Ehab I. Diab & Madhav G. Badami & Ahmed M. El-Geneidy, 2015. "Bus Transit Service Reliability and Improvement Strategies: Integrating the Perspectives of Passengers and Transit Agencies in North America," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 35(3), pages 292-328, May.
    26. Singh, Harpreet & Kathuria, Ankit, 2023. "Heterogeneity in passenger satisfaction of bus rapid transit system among age and gender groups: A PLS-SEM Multi-group analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 27-41.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Who stays loyal to transit? Understanding preference-based heterogeneity in service satisfaction," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 112(C).
    2. de Oña, Juan, 2020. "The role of involvement with public transport in the relationship between service quality, satisfaction and behavioral intentions," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 142(C), pages 296-318.
    3. Thiago Carvalho & Ahmed El-Geneidy, 2026. "Everything has changed: the impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on the transit market in Montréal, Canada," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 285-308, February.
    4. Lucas Cavalcante Machado & Ana Margarita Larranaga & Alejandro Ruiz-Padillo & Christine Tessele Nodari & Helena Beatriz Bettella Cybis, 2026. "Quantifying the impact of metrorail transport quality factors on overall user satisfaction: a Brazilian case study," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(4), pages 2103-2146, August.
    5. Asgharpour, Sina & Askari, Sajad & Mohammadian, Abolfazl (Kouros), 2025. "Dependence or preference? Navigating public transit loyalty across heterogeneous levels of transit dependence," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 821-837.
    6. Sun, Shichao & Cheng, Luju & Zhang, Kaiyu & Wang, Pingye, 2026. "“Push” meets “retention”: How public transit satisfaction moderates new-energy vehicle incentive policies in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    7. Wei Chiang Chan & Wan Hashim Wan Ibrahim & May Chiun Lo & Mohamad Kadim Suaidi & Shiaw Tong Ha, 2020. "Sustainability of Public Transportation: An Examination of User Behavior to Real-Time GPS Tracking Application," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-20, November.
    8. de Oña, Juan, 2021. "Understanding the mediator role of satisfaction in public transport: A cross-country analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 100(C), pages 129-149.
    9. Carvalho, Thiago & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2026. "Factors associated with future transit use intentions: Evidence from large, mid-sized, and small Canadian metropolitan areas," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    10. Quy Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy & Nguyen, Teron & Ngoc Su, Diep & Thi Le, Phuong & Oviedo-Trespalacios, Oscar, 2022. "How do social cues from other passengers affect word-of-mouth and intention to continue using bus services? A second-order SEM approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 302-320.
    11. Hanumantha Rao Sama & Long-Sheng Chen & Venkateswarlu Nalluri & Madhavaiah Chendragiri, 2023. "Enhancing service quality of rural public transport during the COVID-19 pandemic: a novel fuzzy approach," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 15(2), pages 479-501, June.
    12. Li, Zhi-Chun & Ma, Zhenni & Nguyen-Phuoc, Duy Quy & Fu, Xiaowen, 2025. "Influential factors and passenger satisfaction towards integrated urban-rural bus services: A case study of Chibi, China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    13. Nilsson, Jonas & Jansson, Johan & Nicholas, Kimberly & Zhao, Chunli, 2025. "Traveler perceived service quality and satisfaction with public transport: The influence of digital competence and environmental attitudes," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 172(C).
    14. Luo, Shuli & He, Sylvia Y., 2021. "Understanding gender difference in perceptions toward transit services across space and time: A social media mining approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 111(C), pages 63-73.
    15. De Vos, Jonas, 2018. "Do people travel with their preferred travel mode? Analysing the extent of travel mode dissonance and its effect on travel satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 261-274.
    16. Carvalho, Thiago & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2026. "Do intentions translate into use? Transit market evolution and intention-behavior gaps after a new BRT service in Montreal, Canada," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
    17. Ahmad Nazrul Hakimi Ibrahim & Muhamad Nazri Borhan & Muhamad Razuhanafi Mat Yazid & Sitti Asmah Hassan & Ahmad Firdhaus Arham & Sharizal Hashim, 2023. "Modelling of Passenger Satisfaction and Reuse Intention with Monorail Services in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia: A Hybrid SEM-ANN Approach," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 11(15), pages 1-21, August.
    18. Eugene Sogbe & Susilawati Susilawati & Tan Chee Pin, 2025. "Scaling up public transport usage: a systematic literature review of service quality, satisfaction and attitude towards bus transport systems in developing countries," Public Transport, Springer, vol. 17(1), pages 1-44, March.
    19. Rong, Rui & Liu, Lishan & Jia, Ning & Ma, Shoufeng, 2022. "Impact analysis of actual traveling performance on bus passenger’s perception and satisfaction," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 80-100.
    20. Chen, Ching-Fu & Tsai, Wei-Lun, 2026. "A deeper look at the effects of the Mobility-as-a-Service (MaaS) service experience on brand loyalty and brand attachment: the roles of effort and seamlessness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.