Author
Listed:
- Carvalho, Thiago
- El-Geneidy, Ahmed
Abstract
As public transit agencies struggle to win back riders lost during the COVID-19 pandemic, understanding what drives user satisfaction has become critical to retention and ridership recovery. While most research on transit satisfaction relies on cross-sectional data, this paper adopts a longitudinal approach, integrating the hierarchy of transit needs framework to assess whether satisfaction determinants shift over time and across modes using Montreal, Canada, as a case study. Drawing on panel data from the Montreal Mobility Survey, the analysis focuses on 354 rapid transit commuters surveyed in 2023 and 2024, including users of the metro and the newly launched Bus Rapid Transit (BRT) and Light Rail Transit (LRT) systems. We estimated mode-specific weighted Bayesian models and compared the relative importance of different factors across hierarchical layers. Results indicate that satisfaction with the metro remains stable and increasingly driven by comfort, while the BRT shows improving satisfaction over time with strong reliance on functional factors such as waiting time. For the LRT, both functional and hedonic attributes play central roles in satisfaction, particularly travel times and information availability. This research highlights the importance of sequencing investments to match service maturity, prioritizing foundational needs, such as service reliability, before higher-order features, and investing early in perception-building strategies for new systems. These results provide empirical evidence on the temporal dynamics of satisfaction and offer guidance for transit agencies on strategies to retain current riders and attract new ones in a post-pandemic context.
Suggested Citation
Carvalho, Thiago & El-Geneidy, Ahmed, 2026.
"Drivers of trip satisfaction over time: A case study across rapid transit systems in Montreal, Canada,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002053
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105064
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426002053. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.