IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v210y2026ics0965856426001825.html

Navigating artificial intelligence risk: Investigating intention to adopt driverless vehicles through an extended technology acceptance model

Author

Listed:
  • Zhu, Weiwei
  • Jiao, Yingwen
  • Wang, Fangbin

Abstract

The growing development of driverless vehicles profoundly affects the future transportation landscape. The realization of their safety, environmental benefits, and economic efficiency hinges on practical implementation. Understanding the public’s perceived risks and psychological acceptance process of driverless vehicles is critical to predicting their widespread adoption. This research expands the technology acceptance model by incorporating perceived risk, affect-based trust, cognition-based trust, personal innovativeness, subjective norms, and cost to explain the adoption intention of driverless vehicles. The data utilized in this study were gathered through a questionnaire survey carried out in China. The findings indicate that perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, attitude, and subjective norms exert positive influences on behavioral intention, whereas cost exhibits negative effects. Perceived risk demonstrates a dual-path influence: while it directly inhibits behavioral intention, it also exhibits significant indirect effects on behavioral intention through perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. Personal innovativeness significantly enhances both perceived ease of use and perceived usefulness. Both cognition-based trust and affect-based trust enhance perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use. This study offers management insights for stakeholders to boost the public’s intention to adopt driverless vehicles.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhu, Weiwei & Jiao, Yingwen & Wang, Fangbin, 2026. "Navigating artificial intelligence risk: Investigating intention to adopt driverless vehicles through an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001825
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105041
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426001825
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105041?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Ning & Tian, Hangqi & Zhu, Shunbo & Li, Yuan, 2022. "Analysis of public acceptance of electric vehicle charging scheduling based on the technology acceptance model," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 258(C).
    2. Kum Fai Yuen & Ling Qian Choo & Xue Li & Yiik Diew Wong & Fei Ma & Xueqin Wang, 2023. "A theoretical investigation of user acceptance of autonomous public transport," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(2), pages 545-569, April.
    3. Peng Liu & Run Yang & Zhigang Xu, 2019. "How Safe Is Safe Enough for Self‐Driving Vehicles?," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 315-325, February.
    4. Ajzen, Icek, 1991. "The theory of planned behavior," Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Elsevier, vol. 50(2), pages 179-211, December.
    5. Crisafulli, B. & Guesalaga, R. & Dimitriu, R., 2025. "Consumers’ adoption of autonomous cars as a personal values-directed behavior," Journal of Business Research, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    6. Schepis, Daniel & Purchase, Sharon & Olaru, Doina & Smith, Brett & Ellis, Nick, 2023. "How governments influence autonomous vehicle (AV) innovation," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    7. Yu Wang & Shanyong Wang & Jing Wang & Jiuchang Wei & Chenglin Wang, 2020. "An empirical study of consumers’ intention to use ride-sharing services: using an extended technology acceptance model," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(1), pages 397-415, February.
    8. Midgley, David F & Dowling, Grahame R, 1978. "Innovativeness: The Concept and Its Measurement," Journal of Consumer Research, Journal of Consumer Research Inc., vol. 4(4), pages 229-242, March.
    9. Zhu, Weiwei & Wei, Jinmeng, 2025. "Influence of information strategies on behavioral intention to adopt driverless vehicles: Based on a survey experiment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    10. Kostas Mouratidis & Sebastian Peters, 2025. "Autonomous Vehicles as Public Transport: Perceptions of Risks and Opportunities for Mobility, the Environment, and Society," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 32(5), pages 93-114, October.
    11. Yochanan E. Bigman & Kurt Gray, 2020. "Life and death decisions of autonomous vehicles," Nature, Nature, vol. 579(7797), pages 1-2, March.
    12. Martina Raue & Lisa A. D'Ambrosio & Carley Ward & Chaiwoo Lee & Claire Jacquillat & Joseph F. Coughlin, 2019. "The Influence of Feelings While Driving Regular Cars on the Perception and Acceptance of Self‐Driving Cars," Risk Analysis, John Wiley & Sons, vol. 39(2), pages 358-374, February.
    13. Kenesei, Zsófia & Ásványi, Katalin & Kökény, László & Jászberényi, Melinda & Miskolczi, Márk & Gyulavári, Tamás & Syahrivar, Jhanghiz, 2022. "Trust and perceived risk: How different manifestations affect the adoption of autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 164(C), pages 379-393.
    14. Kaplan, Leah & Nurullaeva, Lola & Helveston, John Paul, 2024. "Modeling the operational and labor costs of autonomous robotaxi services," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 159(C), pages 108-119.
    15. Dubey, Subodh & Sharma, Ishant & Mishra, Sabyasachee & Cats, Oded & Bansal, Prateek, 2022. "A General Framework to Forecast the Adoption of Novel Products: A Case of Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 63-95.
    16. Viswanath Venkatesh & Fred D. Davis, 2000. "A Theoretical Extension of the Technology Acceptance Model: Four Longitudinal Field Studies," Management Science, INFORMS, vol. 46(2), pages 186-204, February.
    17. Faisal, Asif & Yigitcanlar, Tan & Paz, Alexander, 2023. "Understanding driverless car adoption: Random parameters ordered probit model for Brisbane, Melbourne and Sydney," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 110(C).
    18. Nunes, Ashley & Hernandez, Kristen D., 2020. "Autonomous taxis & public health: High cost or high opportunity cost?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 28-36.
    19. Wistedt, Ugné, 2024. "Consumer purchase intention toward POI-retailers in cross-border E-commerce: An integration of technology acceptance model and commitment-trust theory," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 81(C).
    20. Zur, Andrew & Leckie, Civilai & Webster, Cynthia M., 2012. "Cognitive and affective trust between Australian exporters and their overseas buyers," Australasian marketing journal, Elsevier, vol. 20(1), pages 73-79.
    21. Patil, Pushp & Tamilmani, Kuttimani & Rana, Nripendra P. & Raghavan, Vishnupriya, 2020. "Understanding consumer adoption of mobile payment in India: Extending Meta-UTAUT model with personal innovativeness, anxiety, trust, and grievance redressal," International Journal of Information Management, Elsevier, vol. 54(C).
    22. Wu, Jingwen & Liao, Hua & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Analysis of consumer attitudes towards autonomous, connected, and electric vehicles: A survey in China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    23. Pan, Yuchen & Wu, Yu & Xu, Lu & Xia, Chengyi & Olson, David L., 2024. "The impacts of connected autonomous vehicles on mixed traffic flow: A comprehensive review," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 635(C).
    24. Rejali, Sina & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Esmaeli, Saeed & Shiwakoti, Nirajan, 2023. "Comparison of technology acceptance model, theory of planned behavior, and unified theory of acceptance and use of technology to assess a priori acceptance of fully automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 168(C).
    25. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Djanie, Ammishaddai Kotey, 2024. "Remedying driving range and refueling challenges in electric mobility: Consumer adoption of battery-swappable electric vehicles," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 78(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Greifenstein, Marvin & Nordhoff, Sina & Wang, Xinyi & Atluri, Bhuvan, 2026. "Riding into the future: What drives the use of robotaxis in San Francisco?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    2. Zhang, Liming & Yao, Xuejiao & Xiao, Yao & Zhang, Yingxin & Cai, Ming, 2024. "Mechanisms and implications of autonomous vehicle market penetration: Insights from a Markov forecasting model," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 43-61.
    3. Eccarius, Timo & Leung, Abraham & Chen, Ching-Fu, 2026. "Love at first sight? Segmenting tourists’ attitudes toward autonomous boats in Kaohsiung’s Love River," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    4. Zhang, Kai & Cheng, Xiaoting, 2025. "Determinants of consumers’ intentions to use smart home devices from the perspective of perceived value: A mixed SEM, NCA, and fsQCA study," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 87(C).
    5. Asmussen, Katherine E. & Mondal, Aupal & Bhat, Chandra R., 2022. "Adoption of partially automated vehicle technology features and impacts on vehicle miles of travel (VMT)," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 156-179.
    6. Attié, Elodie & Meyer-Waarden, Lars, 2022. "The acceptance and usage of smart connected objects according to adoption stages: an enhanced technology acceptance model integrating the diffusion of innovation, uses and gratification and privacy calculus theories," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Kordrostami, Ala & Esmailpour, Javad & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Shiwakoti, Nirajan, 2026. "Incorporating embarrassment of publicly help-seeking into technology Acceptance: Policy pathways for mobility scooter adoption among people with disabilities," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 182(C).
    8. Sarker, Prianka & Hughes, Laurie & Malik, Tegwen & Dwivedi, Yogesh K., 2025. "Examining consumer adoption of social commerce: An extended META-UTAUT model," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 212(C).
    9. Niu, Zhipeng & Liu, Wenjia & Yao, Jia & Xiao, Xu & Wu, Jianjun, 2025. "A multidimensional analysis of potential suppliers’ behavioral intentions in shared parking: Insights from SEM, NCA, and fsQCA," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 174(C).
    10. Adu-Gyamfi, Gibbson & Song, Huaming & Asamoah, Ama Nyarko & Li, Liang & Nketiah, Emmanuel & Obuobi, Bright & Adjei, Mavis & Cudjoe, Dan, 2022. "Towards sustainable vehicular transport: Empirical assessment of battery swap technology adoption in China," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 184(C).
    11. Marcati, Alberto & Guido, Gianluigi & Peluso, Alessandro M., 2008. "The role of SME entrepreneurs' innovativeness and personality in the adoption of innovations," Research Policy, Elsevier, vol. 37(9), pages 1579-1590, October.
    12. Armah, Abdul Karim & Li, Jinfa & Wei, Mengdi, 2025. "Effect of infrastructure and technological factors on slum online commerce and product delivery: A structural functionalism perspective," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 85(C).
    13. Cudjoe, Dan & Zhu, Bangzhu & Wang, Hong, 2024. "The role of incentive policies and personal innovativeness in consumers' carbon footprint tracking apps adoption in China," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    14. Ji, Ting & Wang, Shaofeng & Wang, Jianyuan & Zhang, Jie, 2026. "Beyond technology: Role of technology-organization-environment-human factors in autonomous driving adoption for new energy vehicles," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 88(C).
    15. Hu, Sangen & Li, Chun & Wu, Weitiao & Yang, Ying, 2025. "Exploring the determinants of demand-responsive transit acceptance in China," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 150-163.
    16. Zhu, Weiwei & Wei, Jinmeng, 2025. "Influence of information strategies on behavioral intention to adopt driverless vehicles: Based on a survey experiment," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 318(C).
    17. Abdalwali Lutfi, 2022. "Factors Influencing the Continuance Intention to Use Accounting Information System in Jordanian SMEs from the Perspectives of UTAUT: Top Management Support and Self-Efficacy as Predictor Factors," Economies, MDPI, vol. 10(4), pages 1-17, March.
    18. Naihui Wang & Yulong Pei & Hao Fu, 2022. "Public Acceptance of Last-Mile Shuttle Bus Services with Automation and Electrification in Cold-Climate Environments," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(21), pages 1-16, November.
    19. Eun-Jung Kim & Jinkyung Jenny Kim & Sang-Ho Han, 2021. "Understanding Student Acceptance of Online Learning Systems in Higher Education: Application of Social Psychology Theories with Consideration of User Innovativeness," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(2), pages 1-14, January.
    20. Esmaili, Arsalan & Rejali, Sina & Aghabayk, Kayvan & Mohammadi, Amin & De Gruyter, Chris, 2025. "Autonomous delivery vehicle acceptance: The moderating role of perceived risk of theft," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 162(C), pages 406-423.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001825. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.