Author
Listed:
- Cantillo-Garcia, Victor
- Calastri, Chiara
- Liu, Haiyan
- Hess, Stephane
Abstract
Most travel behaviour studies rely on cross-sectional data. The absence of a temporal dimension in such data hinders analysts from establishing causal relationships and understanding travel patterns over time, which are key to developing accurate analyses and forecasting tools. Studies aiming to capture choices over time are often constrained by the limited availability of panel data, especially for long-term evaluations and in low- and middle-income countries, where, at best, repeated cross-sections are available. This paper applies a novel Latent Class (LC) choice model to accommodate heterogeneity in mode choices over time when panel data is unavailable, exploiting four waves from a repeated cross-sectional dataset collected in Bogotá, Colombia, between 2011 and 2023. Instead of modelling individual choices, we track the behaviour of groups of people over time. To do so, the data is spatially aggregated to link observations across waves, thereby constructing a pseudo-panel at the zonal level, and modal market shares between origin–destination pairs are modelled using a Fractional Multinomial Logit Model (FMNL). The LC structure introduces temporal variation in preferences by allowing zonal groups to switch classes over time, in contrast to traditional LC, in which class membership is fixed. Our findings suggest that two main modality styles (i.e., classes) explain mode choices in Bogotá, the first is characterised by a lower value of time and a higher willingness to cycle and walk longer distances, and the other is more time sensitive. We find that the probability of belonging to the first class increases over time, a finding enabled by the novel approach we propose.
Suggested Citation
Cantillo-Garcia, Victor & Calastri, Chiara & Liu, Haiyan & Hess, Stephane, 2026.
"Modelling aggregate travel behaviour over time in the absence of panel data: methods and a case study from Colombia,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001771
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105036
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001771. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.