IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v210y2026ics0965856426001734.html

The effect of COVID-19 slow streets on dockless scooter travel: a quasi-experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Boarnet, Marlon G.
  • Lee, Seula
  • Gross, James
  • Thigpen, Calvin

Abstract

We used the implementation of slow streets during COVID-19 as a quasi-experiment to understand how street treatments that prioritize non-car travel influenced dockless scooter trips. We gathered data on slow streets implementation from Los Angeles, Oakland, Portland, and San Francisco and identified control group, non-implemented slow streets candidates in three cities (excluding Portland). We examined the impact of slow streets on dockless scooter trips using a before-after, experimental-control group design. We implemented differences-in-differences and panel regressions to analyze the effect of slow streets on scooter trips, finding a robust pattern of statistically significant, positive associations between slow streets implementation and dockless trips. The treatment effect is generally in the range of a 7% to 94% increase in dockless trips. The results indicate potential for infrastructure treatments that slow car travel and prioritize non-car modes to increase dockless scooter trip-making. We discuss the findings and suggest avenues for future research.

Suggested Citation

  • Boarnet, Marlon G. & Lee, Seula & Gross, James & Thigpen, Calvin, 2026. "The effect of COVID-19 slow streets on dockless scooter travel: a quasi-experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 210(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001734
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105032
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426001734
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105032?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:210:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001734. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.