IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v209y2026ics0965856426001564.html

Understanding public perceptions of shared e-scooters: An investigation from rider and non-rider perspectives

Author

Listed:
  • Zhang, Yuting
  • Balbontin, Camila
  • Nelson, John D.
  • Mulley, Corinne
  • Kent, Jennifer L.

Abstract

The rapid growth of e-scooter sharing schemes has sparked both enthusiasm and controversy, prompting cities to develop new regulations to address safety, accessibility, and public space management. The attitudes and behaviours of both riders and non-riders can determine the success or otherwise of shared e-scooter services, rendering public perceptions of these schemes a key source of information for policymakers and practitioners. Using data from an online survey of riders (N = 401) and three non-rider focus groups (N = 24) across three trial locations, this paper examines public perceptions of shared e-scooters from the perspective of both riders and non-riders. The analysis explores the themes of awareness of shared e-scooters, perceived benefits of shared e-scooter use and perceived barriers of use. We then focus solely on riders and explore rider satisfaction (including latent class modelling), motivations for use and future intentions to use shared e-scooters. Findings reveal clear distinctions in perceptions between riders and non-riders of shared e-scooters. Riders generally have a positive view of the shared e-scooter trial and are likely to continue their use. Disparities in gender, age, and income among riders highlight the need for inclusive design of shared schemes. The perception among non-riders is shaped by both their level of awareness of the scheme and their indirect experiences with the vehicles, with concerns related to levels of awareness of the trial scheme, uncertainty about riding rules, safety issues, and difficulty distinguishing between shared and privately owned e-scooters.

Suggested Citation

  • Zhang, Yuting & Balbontin, Camila & Nelson, John D. & Mulley, Corinne & Kent, Jennifer L., 2026. "Understanding public perceptions of shared e-scooters: An investigation from rider and non-rider perspectives," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 209(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001564
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.105015
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426001564
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.105015?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:209:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001564. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.