Author
Listed:
- Wong, R.C.P.
- Wan, L.Y.
- Szeto, W.Y.
- Ali, Nazam
Abstract
The ageing population presents a global demographic challenge, as elderly mobility declines rapidly due to their lack of stable income and limited physical and cognitive abilities. Autonomous demand-responsive transport emerges as a potential solution to cater to their specific transport needs. To comprehend their acceptance and adoption of autonomous demand-responsive transport, a stated preference survey was conducted, interviewing 232 elderly individuals aged 60 or above in Hong Kong. The design of choice experiments was pivoted with respect to revealed trips from the surveyed elderly to simulate realistic choice scenarios. Using the collected data, logit models were developed to identify contributory factors influencing their mode choice between their currently chosen alternative and the new transport mode. The results indicate that travel fare, walk time, on-street wait time, in-vehicle travel time, seat availability, and the provision of on-board staff are the significant attributes. Notably, seat availability possesses the highest impact among all attributes. It is therefore recommended that seats should be reserved in conjunction with the demand-responsive service. An unobserved heterogeneity among the elderly is identified in the provision of on-board staff. About 35% of them hold a negative perception of this arrangement while others were more likely to adopt an on-board staff member for safety concerns. The study highlights that the elderly were hesitant to shift to autonomous demand-responsive transport due to their concerns about autonomous driving and digital proficiency. As such, it is recommended that the implementation of autonomous demand-responsive transport should be progressive in a transit-oriented city.
Suggested Citation
Wong, R.C.P. & Wan, L.Y. & Szeto, W.Y. & Ali, Nazam, 2026.
"Revolutionizing elderly mobility through autonomous demand-responsive transport services,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 208(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:208:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001199
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104978
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:208:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426001199. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.