IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v207y2026ics0965856426000790.html

Autonomous vehicles in the public eye: A global social media analysis for smarter policies

Author

Listed:
  • Bhaduri, Eeshan
  • Kalatian, Arash
  • Wang, He
  • Choudhury, Charisma F.

Abstract

With the widespread popularity of social media, it has emerged as a mirror of public sentiments. This provides planners and policy makers the opportunity to leverage this large and diverse data source to assess the sentiments towards futuristic travel alternatives like autonomous vehicles (AVs) and investigate their temporal evolutions. Further, the geo-tagged social media datasets and the advancements in topic modelling also provide the opportunity to analyse the spatial variation of topics of interest alongside the polarity of sentiments in different parts of the world. This motivates this study, where we extracted and utilised 94,469 AV-related Tweets between the 2010-21 period across eleven countries to develop multiple machine learning (ML) based and large language model (LLM) based sentiment analysis models to detect spatiotemporal heterogeneity in sentiments among the countries and cluster them based on similarity in sentiment polarity. Subsequently, dynamic topic models (BERTopic) are used to identify the underlying themes of public discourse in the identified clusters and contextualise their evolution. The sentiment analysis results reveal substantial differences in sentiment polarity across countries and uncover five distinct clusters. People in cluster 1 (USA and South Africa) and 2 (UK, Canada and Australia) are found to be more opinionated (both positive and negative) than the other three clusters. In terms of temporal trend, the results indicate higher positive sentiments prevailing for the most part of the last decade, except for fatal accidents, which created a strong negative ripple effect. Further investigation of the key topics driving the public sentiment reveals five major inherent themes based on Tweet frequency as well as commonality across countries: safety concerns, industry and investment, excitement, clean energy, and trucks. The dynamic topic model results also provide insights into the effect of the context-specific interventions, while the relative order of the topics indicates the differential acceptance or expectation of the autonomous future among the general masses. These insights include recommendations to policymakers and AV manufacturers to suggest future directions for a sustainable transition to autonomous transportation systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Bhaduri, Eeshan & Kalatian, Arash & Wang, He & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2026. "Autonomous vehicles in the public eye: A global social media analysis for smarter policies," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 207(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000790
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104938
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000790
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104938?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Wang, Yu & Hancock, Thomas O. & Wang, Yacan & Choudhury, Charisma, 2025. "Modelling residential relocation behaviour combining passive revealed preference data and stated preference survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    2. Sindi, Safaa & Woodman, Roger, 2021. "Implementing commercial autonomous road haulage in freight operations: An industry perspective," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 152(C), pages 235-253.
    3. Dedehayir, Ozgur & Steinert, Martin, 2016. "The hype cycle model: A review and future directions," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 28-41.
    4. Wang, Fei & Zhang, Zhentai & Lin, Shoufu, 2023. "Purchase intention of Autonomous vehicles and industrial Policies: Evidence from a national survey in China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    5. Shengzhao Wang & Meitang Li & Bo Yu & Shan Bao & Yuren Chen, 2022. "Investigating the Impacting Factors on the Public’s Attitudes towards Autonomous Vehicles Using Sentiment Analysis from Social Media Data," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(19), pages 1-17, September.
    6. Nikolaos Bakalos & Nikolaos Papadakis & Antonios Litke, 2020. "Public Perception of Autonomous Mobility Using ML-Based Sentiment Analysis over Social Media Data," Logistics, MDPI, vol. 4(2), pages 1-14, June.
    7. Edmond Awad & Sohan Dsouza & Richard Kim & Jonathan Schulz & Joseph Henrich & Azim Shariff & Jean-François Bonnefon & Iyad Rahwan, 2018. "The Moral Machine experiment," Nature, Nature, vol. 563(7729), pages 59-64, November.
    8. Ashish K. Rathore & Arpan K. Kar & P. Vigneswara Ilavarasan, 2017. "Social Media Analytics: Literature Review and Directions for Future Research," Decision Analysis, INFORMS, vol. 14(4), pages 229-249, December.
    9. Shelly Etzioni & Jamil Hamadneh & Arnór B. Elvarsson & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss & Milena Djukanovic & Stelios N. Neophytou & Jaka Sodnik & Amalia Polydoropoulou & Ioannis Tsouros & Cristina Pronello & N, 2020. "Modeling Cross-National Differences in Automated Vehicle Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    10. Bratanova, A. & Mason, C. & Evans, D. & Schleiger, E. & Grimberg, E. & Walker, G. & Pham, H. & Bulled, K., 2026. "Truck drivers and automation: A methodology for identifying and supporting workforce transition in the Australian road freight sector," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Anania, Emily C. & Rice, Stephen & Walters, Nathan W. & Pierce, Matthew & Winter, Scott R. & Milner, Mattie N., 2018. "The effects of positive and negative information on consumers’ willingness to ride in a driverless vehicle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 218-224.
    12. Zhang, Qiyuan & Wallbridge, Christopher D. & Jones, Dylan M. & Morgan, Phillip L., 2024. "Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    13. Kacperski, Celina & Ulloa, Roberto & Wautelet, Jérémy & Vogel, Tobias & Kutzner, Florian, 2025. "Enhancing autonomous vehicle acceptance with age and education sensitive simulation interventions: an experimental trial," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 194(C).
    14. Kwon, O. Hwang & Vu, Katie & Bhargava, Naman & Radaideh, Mohammed I. & Cooper, Jacob & Joynt, Veda & Radaideh, Majdi I., 2024. "Sentiment analysis of the United States public support of nuclear power on social media using large language models," Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews, Elsevier, vol. 200(C).
    15. Wadud, Zia & MacKenzie, Don & Leiby, Paul, 2016. "Help or hindrance? The travel, energy and carbon impacts of highly automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 86(C), pages 1-18.
    16. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Li Shen & Peter R. Stopher, 2014. "Review of GPS Travel Survey and GPS Data-Processing Methods," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 34(3), pages 316-334, May.
    18. Nastjuk, Ilja & Herrenkind, Bernd & Marrone, Mauricio & Brendel, Alfred Benedikt & Kolbe, Lutz M., 2020. "What drives the acceptance of autonomous driving? An investigation of acceptance factors from an end-user's perspective," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 161(C).
    19. Tengilimoglu, Oguz & Carsten, Oliver & Wadud, Zia, 2023. "Infrastructure requirements for the safe operation of automated vehicles: Opinions from experts and stakeholders," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 133(C), pages 209-222.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xing, Yingying & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao & Zhang, Meng & Lu, Jian, 2022. "What influences vulnerable road users’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles? A comparative analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh surveys," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    2. Xinghua Li & Jieru Zou & Shubham Agrawal & Yuntao Guo & Tianpei Tang & Xi Feng, 2026. "Role of policy and consumer attitudes in people’s intention to use autonomous vehicles: a comparative study in China and the USA," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(2), pages 603-650, April.
    3. Öztürk, İbrahim & Lehtonen, Esko & Madigan, Ruth & Lee, Yee Mun & Aittoniemi, Elina & Merat, Natasha, 2025. "Cross-country differences in willingness to use conditionally automated driving systems: Impact of technology affinity, driving skills, and perceived traffic climate," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 82(C).
    4. Du, Manqing & Zhang, Tingru & Liu, Jinting & Xu, Zhigang & Liu, Peng, 2022. "Rumors in the air? Exploring public misconceptions about automated vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 237-252.
    5. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    6. Yoganathan, Vignesh & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie, 2024. "Heterogenous evaluations of autonomous vehicle services: An extended theoretical framework and empirical evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    7. Zhang, Qiyuan & Marcinkiewicz, Victoria & Bowen, Louise & Kozlowski, Theodor & Inatani, Tatsuhiko & Ueda, Yoshiyuki & Katsuno, Hirofumi & Asada, Minoru & Morgan, Phillip L., 2026. "Should AI be allowed to break the law? Public acceptance and tolerance of discretionary actions performed by autonomous vehicles in response to situations varying by degree of acuteness," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
    8. Bhaduri, Eeshan & Choudhury, Charisma F., 2026. "Shifting skies: A cross-country investigation of evolution of public perception toward urban air mobility through Twitter (X) discourse," Journal of Air Transport Management, Elsevier, vol. 132(C).
    9. Alessandro La Delfa & Zheng Han, 2025. "Sustainable Mobility and Shared Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Literature Review of Travel Behavior Impacts," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 17(7), pages 1-39, March.
    10. Wang, Xianing & Lu, Linjun & Zhang, Zhan & Wang, Ying & Li, Haoming, 2025. "Introducing the vehicle-infrastructure cooperative control system by quantifying the benefits for the scenario of signalized intersections," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    11. Jia Guo & Yusak Susilo & Constantinos Antoniou & Anna Pernestål Brenden, 2020. "Influence of Individual Perceptions on the Decision to Adopt Automated Bus Services," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(16), pages 1-13, August.
    12. Li, Dun & Huang, Youlin & Qian, Lixian, 2022. "Potential adoption of robotaxi service: The roles of perceived benefits to multiple stakeholders and environmental awareness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 126(C), pages 120-135.
    13. Zhang, Qiyuan & Wallbridge, Christopher D. & Jones, Dylan M. & Morgan, Phillip L., 2024. "Public perception of autonomous vehicle capability determines judgment of blame and trust in road traffic accidents," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Shelly Etzioni & Jamil Hamadneh & Arnór B. Elvarsson & Domokos Esztergár-Kiss & Milena Djukanovic & Stelios N. Neophytou & Jaka Sodnik & Amalia Polydoropoulou & Ioannis Tsouros & Cristina Pronello & N, 2020. "Modeling Cross-National Differences in Automated Vehicle Acceptance," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(22), pages 1-22, November.
    15. Foroughi, Behzad & Nhan, Pham Viet & Iranmanesh, Mohammad & Ghobakhloo, Morteza & Nilashi, Mehrbakhsh & Yadegaridehkordi, Elaheh, 2023. "Determinants of intention to use autonomous vehicles: Findings from PLS-SEM and ANFIS," Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, Elsevier, vol. 70(C).
    16. Li, Yanlin & Tsang, Y.P. & Lee, C.K.M. & Zhang, Qintian & Chen, Zhen-Song, 2025. "Service area identification for robotaxi deployment: A GIS-based spatio-temporal multi-criteria decision support framework," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 171(C), pages 497-512.
    17. Fahimeh Golbabaei & Tan Yigitcanlar & Alexander Paz & Jonathan Bunker, 2023. "Perceived Opportunities and Challenges of Autonomous Demand-Responsive Transit Use: What Are the Socio-Demographic Predictors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    18. Xing, Yingying & Li, Lun & Sheng, Xiaolu & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao, 2025. "Understanding public perceptions of autonomous vehicles: A structural model to urban-rural differences and psychological factors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 165(C), pages 70-84.
    19. Miltos Kyriakidis & Jaka Sodnik & Kristina Stojmenova & Arnór B. Elvarsson & Cristina Pronello & Nikolas Thomopoulos, 2020. "The Role of Human Operators in Safety Perception of AV Deployment—Insights from a Large European Survey," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(21), pages 1-24, November.
    20. Ng, Gary Ting Tat & Lin, Ching-Yun, 2026. "Tackling the social dilemma of autonomous vehicles using social norms," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:207:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000790. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.