IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v206y2026ics0965856426000467.html

Understanding traffic law enforcement perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Insights from Chinese cities with operational robotaxi fleets through hypothesis testing and machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Ningzhe
  • Zhao, Dan
  • Yu, Yang
  • Liu, Jun

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are expected to improve road safety by reducing human error, which accounts for over 90% of traffic incidents. However, AVs also present new challenges for traffic law enforcement, particularly in their interactions with officers and their ability to navigate emergency situations, such as safely passing law enforcement officers (LEOs). This study examines these challenges through a survey of 1522 traffic LEOs in Chinese cities with operational AV fleets. The survey focused on two critical perceptions: LEOs’ confidence in AVs’ ability to follow traffic commands and trust in AVs’ ability to safely pass LEOs. Results indicate that over 90% of LEOs lacked confidence in AVs’ ability to follow commands, and nearly 70% did not trust AVs to safely pass LEOs. Officers with direct experience managing AV-related incidents or riding in a robotaxi reported slightly higher confidence and trust levels, but overall perceptions were mixed. Chi-square tests and machine learning analyses further indicated that factors such as AV-related knowledge, procedural training, and attitudes toward robotaxis were significantly associated with these perceptions. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programs, increased exposure to AV technologies, and public engagement strategies to enhance law enforcement trust in AVs and their safe integration into traffic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Ningzhe & Zhao, Dan & Yu, Yang & Liu, Jun, 2026. "Understanding traffic law enforcement perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Insights from Chinese cities with operational robotaxi fleets through hypothesis testing and machine learning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000467
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000467
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Ljubi, Klara & Groznik, Aleš, 2023. "Role played by social factors and privacy concerns in autonomous vehicle adoption," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 132(C), pages 1-15.
    2. Xu, Ningzhe & Liu, Jun & Fu, Xing & Shi, Yangming & Jones, Steven, 2025. "Understanding first responders’ familiarity and attitudes toward connected and automated vehicles (CAVs): insights from latent class analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    3. Jonas Wanner & Lukas-Valentin Herm & Kai Heinrich & Christian Janiesch, 2022. "The effect of transparency and trust on intelligent system acceptance: Evidence from a user-based study," Electronic Markets, Springer;IIM University of St. Gallen, vol. 32(4), pages 2079-2102, December.
    4. Alfaro, Esteban & Gamez, Matias & García, Noelia, 2013. "adabag: An R Package for Classification with Boosting and Bagging," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 54(i02).
    5. Lhéritier, Alix & Bocamazo, Michael & Delahaye, Thierry & Acuna-Agost, Rodrigo, 2019. "Airline itinerary choice modeling using machine learning," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 198-209.
    6. Xu, Ningzhe & Nie, Qifan & Liu, Jun & Jones, Steven, 2024. "Linking short- and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior and travel preferences in Alabama: A machine learning-supported path analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 46-62.
    7. Liu, Jun & Xu, Ningzhe & Shi, Yangming & Rahman, MD Mizanur & Barnett, Timothy & Jones, Steven, 2023. "Do first responders trust connected and automated vehicles (CAVs)? A national survey," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 85-99.
    8. Anania, Emily C. & Rice, Stephen & Walters, Nathan W. & Pierce, Matthew & Winter, Scott R. & Milner, Mattie N., 2018. "The effects of positive and negative information on consumers’ willingness to ride in a driverless vehicle," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 72(C), pages 218-224.
    9. Kuhn, Max, 2008. "Building Predictive Models in R Using the caret Package," Journal of Statistical Software, Foundation for Open Access Statistics, vol. 28(i05).
    10. Sarah Dennis & Alexander Paz & Tan Yigitcanlar, 2021. "Perceptions and Attitudes Towards the Deployment of Autonomous and Connected Vehicles: Insights from Las Vegas, Nevada," Journal of Urban Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 28(3-4), pages 75-95, October.
    11. Xiao, Jingyi & Goulias, Konstadinos G., 2022. "Perceived usefulness and intentions to adopt autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 170-185.
    12. Pettigrew, Simone & Dana, Liyuwork Mitiku & Norman, Richard, 2019. "Clusters of potential autonomous vehicles users according to propensity to use individual versus shared vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 76(C), pages 13-20.
    13. Wu, Jingwen & Liao, Hua & Wang, Jin-Wei, 2020. "Analysis of consumer attitudes towards autonomous, connected, and electric vehicles: A survey in China," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 80(C).
    14. Hudson, John & Orviska, Marta & Hunady, Jan, 2019. "People’s attitudes to autonomous vehicles," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 121(C), pages 164-176.
    15. Bennett, Roger & Vijaygopal, Rohini & Kottasz, Rita, 2019. "Attitudes towards autonomous vehicles among people with physical disabilities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 127(C), pages 1-17.
    16. Hwang, Jinuk & Kim, Seheon, 2023. "Autonomous vehicle transportation service for people with disabilities: Policy recommendations based on the evidence from hybrid choice model," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 106(C).
    17. Richard Williams, 2012. "Using the margins command to estimate and interpret adjusted predictions and marginal effects," Stata Journal, StataCorp LLC, vol. 12(2), pages 308-331, June.
    18. Jing, Peng & Wang, Baihui & Cai, Yunhao & Wang, Bichen & Huang, Jiahui & Yang, Chenglu & Jiang, Chengxi, 2023. "What is the public really concerned about the AV crash? Insights from a combined analysis of social media and questionnaire survey," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 189(C).
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Xu, Ningzhe & Liu, Jun & Fu, Xing & Shi, Yangming & Jones, Steven, 2025. "Understanding first responders’ familiarity and attitudes toward connected and automated vehicles (CAVs): insights from latent class analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 202(C).
    2. Wang, Song & Li, Zhixia & Wang, Yi & Wyatt, Daniel Aaron, 2024. "How effective is automated vehicle education? – A Kentucky case study revealing the dynamic nature of education effectiveness," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 140-157.
    3. Yoganathan, Vignesh & Osburg, Victoria-Sophie, 2024. "Heterogenous evaluations of autonomous vehicle services: An extended theoretical framework and empirical evidence," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 198(C).
    4. Xu, Ningzhe & Nie, Qifan & Liu, Jun & Jones, Steven, 2024. "Linking short- and long-term impacts of the COVID-19 pandemic on travel behavior and travel preferences in Alabama: A machine learning-supported path analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 46-62.
    5. Fahimeh Golbabaei & Tan Yigitcanlar & Alexander Paz & Jonathan Bunker, 2023. "Perceived Opportunities and Challenges of Autonomous Demand-Responsive Transit Use: What Are the Socio-Demographic Predictors?," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(15), pages 1-18, August.
    6. Xing, Yingying & Zhou, Huiyu & Han, Xiao & Zhang, Meng & Lu, Jian, 2022. "What influences vulnerable road users’ perceptions of autonomous vehicles? A comparative analysis of the 2017 and 2019 Pittsburgh surveys," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    7. Garrow, Laurie A. & Mokhtarian, Patricia L. & German, Brian J. & “Jack” S. Glodek, John & Leonard, Caroline E., 2025. "Market segmentation of an electric vertical takeoff and landing (eVTOL) air taxi commuting service in five large U.S. cities," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 191(C).
    8. Yilun Chen & Nirajan Shiwakoti & Peter Stasinopoulos & Shah Khalid Khan, 2022. "State-of-the-Art of Factors Affecting the Adoption of Automated Vehicles," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 14(11), pages 1-29, May.
    9. Md. Mokhlesur Rahman & Jean-Claude Thill, 2026. "Who is inclined to buy an autonomous vehicle? Empirical evidence from California," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 71-104, February.
    10. dos Santos, Fabio Luis Marques & Duboz, Amandine & Grosso, Monica & Raposo, María Alonso & Krause, Jette & Mourtzouchou, Andromachi & Balahur, Alexandra & Ciuffo, Biagio, 2022. "An acceptance divergence? Media, citizens and policy perspectives on autonomous cars in the European Union," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 158(C), pages 224-238.
    11. Zhu, Ge & Chen, Yuche & Zheng, Jiali, 2024. "Partially autonomous vehicles (PAVs) vs. fully autonomous vehicles (FAVs): A comparative study with adoption models," Technology in Society, Elsevier, vol. 79(C).
    12. YUAN, Yali & YANG, Xiaobao & LI, Sixuan & CUI, Pengfei & YANG, Manli, 2026. "Effects of autonomous vehicles on intercity public transport within urban agglomerations: Exploring multi-layered heterogeneity and distance-based variations," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 224(C).
    13. Huang, Han & Jiang, Yu & Wang, Zicheng & Ma, Wanqi, 2026. "Perceptions of driverless vehicles among social media influencers in China: A case analysis of Apollo Go," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 179(C).
    14. Jen Sim Ho & Booi Chen Tan & Teck Chai Lau & Nasreen Khan, 2023. "Public Acceptance towards Emerging Autonomous Vehicle Technology: A Bibliometric Research," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 15(2), pages 1-18, January.
    15. Pettigrew, Simone & Booth, Leon & Farrar, Victoria & Brown, Julie & Karl, Charles & Godic, Branislava & Vidanaarachchi, Rajith & Thompson, Jason, 2024. "Public support for proposed government policies to optimise the social benefits of autonomous vehicles," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 149(C), pages 264-270.
    16. Peng Jing & Gang Xu & Yuexia Chen & Yuji Shi & Fengping Zhan, 2020. "The Determinants behind the Acceptance of Autonomous Vehicles: A Systematic Review," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 12(5), pages 1-26, February.
    17. Olaru, Doina & Greaves, Stephen & Leighton, Catherine & Smith, Brett & Arnold, Tony, 2021. "Peer-to-Peer (P2P) carsharing and driverless vehicles: Attitudes and values of vehicle owners," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 151(C), pages 180-194.
    18. Acharya, Sailesh & Mekker, Michelle, 2024. "Acceptance and demand of autonomous vehicles for long-distance recreational travel: An investigation based on a survey of visitors to US national parks," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    19. Xu, Ningzhe & Pena-Bastidas, Javier & Yang, Chenxuan & Liu, Jun & Hockstad, Trayce & Jones, Steven, 2025. "Urban and regional Air Mobility (URAM) and relocation decisions in the United States: Insights from a machine learning-supported path analysis," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 92-109.
    20. Ieva Meidute-Kavaliauskiene & Bülent Yıldız & Şemsettin Çiğdem & Renata Činčikaitė, 2021. "Do People Prefer Cars That People Don’t Drive? A Survey Study on Autonomous Vehicles," Energies, MDPI, vol. 14(16), pages 1-21, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.