IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v206y2026ics0965856426000467.html

Understanding traffic law enforcement perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Insights from Chinese cities with operational robotaxi fleets through hypothesis testing and machine learning

Author

Listed:
  • Xu, Ningzhe
  • Zhao, Dan
  • Yu, Yang
  • Liu, Jun

Abstract

Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are expected to improve road safety by reducing human error, which accounts for over 90% of traffic incidents. However, AVs also present new challenges for traffic law enforcement, particularly in their interactions with officers and their ability to navigate emergency situations, such as safely passing law enforcement officers (LEOs). This study examines these challenges through a survey of 1522 traffic LEOs in Chinese cities with operational AV fleets. The survey focused on two critical perceptions: LEOs’ confidence in AVs’ ability to follow traffic commands and trust in AVs’ ability to safely pass LEOs. Results indicate that over 90% of LEOs lacked confidence in AVs’ ability to follow commands, and nearly 70% did not trust AVs to safely pass LEOs. Officers with direct experience managing AV-related incidents or riding in a robotaxi reported slightly higher confidence and trust levels, but overall perceptions were mixed. Chi-square tests and machine learning analyses further indicated that factors such as AV-related knowledge, procedural training, and attitudes toward robotaxis were significantly associated with these perceptions. These findings underscore the need for targeted training programs, increased exposure to AV technologies, and public engagement strategies to enhance law enforcement trust in AVs and their safe integration into traffic systems.

Suggested Citation

  • Xu, Ningzhe & Zhao, Dan & Yu, Yang & Liu, Jun, 2026. "Understanding traffic law enforcement perceptions of autonomous vehicles: Insights from Chinese cities with operational robotaxi fleets through hypothesis testing and machine learning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 206(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000467
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104905
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000467
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104905?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:206:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000467. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.