Author
Listed:
- Wu, Yao
- Luo, Yuanwei
- Liu, Yupeng
- Lin, Yi
- Guo, Yanyong
Abstract
Autonomous vehicles (AVs) are increasingly prioritized in national transport strategies for their potential to improve safety and sustainability. Yet real-world crashes show that AVs remain vulnerable to safety risks, highlighting the need to understand their crash patterns and develop evidence-based countermeasures. The objective of this study is to investigate the factors associated with AV crashes and develop safety countermeasure to improve AV safety. 335 AV crash data from 2021 to 2022 was collected from collision reports from San Francisco at Traffic Analysis Zones (TAZ) level. Sociodemographic, built environment, land-use, and exposure variables were incorporated into Ordinary Least Squares (OLS) and Geographically Weighted Regression (GWR) models. Compared with OLS, the GWR model provides a superior fit, as reflected by its lower AIC (535.17) and residual sum of squares (580.66). Model results revealed diverse effects of build environment on AV crashes across TAZs. Specifically, bus stop and transit lane densities exhibit strong negative associations with crash frequency, particularly in the southwestern regions. Bicycle parking density is negatively correlated with crashes. In contrast, wider sidewalks and higher proportions of speed limit zones are positively associated with AV crashes in certain urban areas. The impact of traffic signal density is spatially inconsistent—showing a crash-reducing effect in northeastern urban areas but a positive association in southwestern regions. Safety countermeasures were proposed from the perspective of understanding the AV crash influencing factors. The study underscores the significance of well-planned transportation facilities in enhancing AV safety.
Suggested Citation
Wu, Yao & Luo, Yuanwei & Liu, Yupeng & Lin, Yi & Guo, Yanyong, 2026.
"How to improve the AV safety: From the understanding of AV crashes to safety enhancement strategy,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000212
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104880
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000212. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.