IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v205y2026ics0965856426000145.html

Unconscious status and car consumption: social comparison effects in a discrete choice experiment

Author

Listed:
  • Bronnmann, Julia
  • Requate, Till
  • Steinbrunner, Philipp

Abstract

This study investigates how social comparison affects consumers’ willingness to pay (WTP) for status-related car attributes. Drawing on theories of positional goods and social utility, we designed a discrete choice experiment (DCE) with a contextual priming component to measure the influence of perceived peer car status on WTP. A representative online sample of 1,289 German car owners evaluated car alternatives that varied in terms of engine power, car segment, SUV type, brand, interior equipment, and purchase price. We estimate both Mixed Logit and Latent Class models in WTP space to capture preference heterogeneity and social context effects. The results show that marginal WTP increases significantly with the perceived status of cars owned by peers, despite the fact that most respondents self-reported little to no influence. Our findings provide novel behavioral evidence of unconscious status consumption and offer a rationale for designing a status-based car tax to address positional externalities in transportation markets.

Suggested Citation

  • Bronnmann, Julia & Requate, Till & Steinbrunner, Philipp, 2026. "Unconscious status and car consumption: social comparison effects in a discrete choice experiment," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000145
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2026.104873
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856426000145
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2026.104873?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856426000145. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.