IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v205y2026ics0965856425004914.html

A comparison of the effects of travel party size versus travel party composition on differences in travel behavior of spouses in Bhubaneswar, India

Author

Listed:
  • Sarangi, Punyabeet
  • Manoj, M.

Abstract

The present study compares and quantifies the importance of ‘travel party size’ and ‘travel party composition’ on themode choice decisions of spouses, an important behavioral aspect that is rarely explored in travel behavior literature. To fulfill this objective, a primary activity-travel diary data was collected in Bhubaneswar City, India, consisting of 978 households and 5476 out-of-home activity trips on weekdays. Mixed multinomial logit (MMNL) models are developed to capture the heterogeneity in mode choice decisions between spouses. The study findings indicate an unobserved complementarity effect for the utilities of public and personal modes for male spouses, whereas a substitution effect between these modes for female spouses. The MMNL model coefficients also reveal gender differences in mode preferences of spouses, different from the recent trends in developed countries that have observed gender convergence in travel behavior. In addition, individual characteristics (e.g., age, completed education), household characteristics (e.g., couple or lineally descendant household, presence of school-going children), and attitudes such as ‘green lifestyle’, significantly affect spouses’ choices of various modes. The study reveals that male heads consider monetary savings on travel time reductions of greater importance than female heads, especially when choosing personal modes. Regarding the importance between trip party size and trip party composition, the results indicate that the addition of an extra member to the existing trip party size does not alter the mode choice preferences of spouses. On the contrary, trip party composition affects mode choice differently for spouses: male heads prefer private modes when traveling with non-family members, whereas females prefer public modes. Spouses, however, prefer to choose personal modes for joint rides with immediate family members. Moreover, the cost implications associated with shared travel arrangements reveal that travel party composition has greater cost repercussions for personal and public modes than it does for travel party size for similar modes. Overall, the findings add to the understanding of travel behavior of spouses and suggest that policies targeting shared mobility and urban travel demand management may consider household-level trip compositions rather than party size.

Suggested Citation

  • Sarangi, Punyabeet & Manoj, M., 2026. "A comparison of the effects of travel party size versus travel party composition on differences in travel behavior of spouses in Bhubaneswar, India," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004914
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104858
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004914
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104858?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004914. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.