Author
Listed:
- Yan, Hong
- Maat, Kees
- van Wee, Bert
Abstract
Cycling speed is an important attribute of bicycle traffic flow, being related to travel times, safety and road capacity. Although cycling speed changes constantly during a trip, it is typically measured at the trip-average or aggregated level, and microscopic speed fluctuations are rarely studied. This study aims to quantitatively understand the cycling speed stability within a trip and the determinants of speed stability and disruption. To this end, data from bicycle trips tracked with GPS devices are used. A change point detection method, the pruned exact linear time (PELT) algorithm, is adapted to split trip trajectories into segments differing in speed stability. Then, a rule-based algorithm is developed to classify segments into six speed (in)stability patterns: stable, increase, decrease, V-shape (speed decreases followed by increases), reverse V-shape (speed increases followed by decreases) and complicated unstable patterns. Finally, a two-level multinomial model is estimated to examine the determinants of different patterns. The findings suggest that stable patterns account for half the trip distances, and their speed is higher than the speed of unstable patterns. The V-shape pattern is the most frequent unstable type. Intersections, turns and built-up land use are the main causes of unstable speeds. Cycling on physically separate paths tends to involve more unstable speeds than on mixed-use infrastructures, such as bicycle streets and bicycle tracks. This study finds that daily cycling involves a considerable amount of unstable speed. While its effects have not been directly examined, speed instability likely increases travel times and physical effort and is perceived negatively by cyclists. This underscores the potential benefits of a smooth cycling network and highlights the need for future research on the role of speed stability.
Suggested Citation
Yan, Hong & Maat, Kees & van Wee, Bert, 2026.
"Explaining patterns of cycling speed stability and disruption,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004884
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104855
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004884. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.