IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v205y2026ics0965856425003398.html

Co-training framework for enhancing survey accuracy while reducing respondent burden in travel data collection

Author

Listed:
  • Alolabi, Reem
  • Chikaraishi, Makoto

Abstract

A major bottleneck in travel behavior analysis is the need for a substantial amount of labeled data, which typically places a burden on survey respondents for collecting travel behavior data. Our study addresses this issue by leveraging semi-supervised learning, specifically utilizing the co-training algorithm, which effectively incorporates both labeled (active) and unlabeled (passive) data. We extend the semi-supervised learning concept to be a part of the survey scheme that involves both data collection process and enrichment process of travel attributes. Our experiments, focusing on travel mode identification using GPS data from Hiroshima, Japan, demonstrate that our proposed method outperforms existing conventional supervised learning methods such as neural networks, KNN, and SVM, particularly when incorporating an increased proportion of unlabeled data. This strategic use of unlabeled data achieves two apparently conflicting goals: (1) reduces the reliance on extensive manual labeling, thereby alleviating respondent burdens, and (2) increases the accuracy of the prediction. The results of our experiments also reveal that the delicate balance between labeled and unlabeled data proportions plays a pivotal role in co-training performance. Beyond serving as a mode identification tool, our findings underscore the transformative potential of co-training as a valuable data filtering method: By optimizing the interplay between labeled and unlabeled data, co-training efficiently filters noise and refines the dataset. This contributes to enhanced survey accuracy while minimizing labeling burdens. Our results provide useful information to design an adaptive scheme that dynamically tailors the information solicited from respondents to optimize the balance between data quality and respondent burden.

Suggested Citation

  • Alolabi, Reem & Chikaraishi, Makoto, 2026. "Co-training framework for enhancing survey accuracy while reducing respondent burden in travel data collection," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 205(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003398
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104706
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003398
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104706?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Tao Feng & Harry J.P. Timmermans, 2016. "Comparison of advanced imputation algorithms for detection of transportation mode and activity episode using GPS data," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 39(2), pages 180-194, March.
    2. Seo, Toru & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Gotoh, Hiroto & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-373.
    3. Zhao, Yuanying & Pawlak, Jacek & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2022. "Theory for socio-demographic enrichment performance using the inverse discrete choice modelling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 101-134.
    4. Li, Linchao & Zhu, Jiasong & Zhang, Hailong & Tan, Huachun & Du, Bowen & Ran, Bin, 2020. "Coupled application of generative adversarial networks and conventional neural networks for travel mode detection using GPS data," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 136(C), pages 282-292.
    5. Yuanying Zhao & Jacek Pawlak & John W. Polak, 2018. "Inverse discrete choice modelling: theoretical and practical considerations for imputing respondent attributes from the patterns of observed choices," Transportation Planning and Technology, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 41(1), pages 58-79, January.
    6. Adrian C. Prelipcean & Gyözö Gidófalvi & Yusak O. Susilo, 2017. "Transportation mode detection – an in-depth review of applicability and reliability," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 37(4), pages 442-464, July.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Hong, Ye & Stüdeli, Emanuel & Raubal, Martin, 2023. "Evaluating geospatial context information for travel mode detection," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 113(C).
    2. Jiajia Zhang & Tao Feng & Harry Timmermans & Zhengkui Lin, 2023. "Improved imputation of rule sets in class association rule modeling: application to transportation mode choice," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(1), pages 63-106, February.
    3. Zhao, Yuanying & Pawlak, Jacek & Sivakumar, Aruna, 2022. "Theory for socio-demographic enrichment performance using the inverse discrete choice modelling approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 155(C), pages 101-134.
    4. Sajjad Sowlati & Rahim Ali Abbaspour & Alireza Chehreghan, 2026. "An approach to assess the role of features in detection of transportation modes," Transportation, Springer, vol. 53(1), pages 133-168, February.
    5. Shuqi Zhong & Jiatao Chen & Ming Cai, 2024. "A Transport Mode Detection Framework Based on Mobile Phone Signaling Data Combined with Bus GPS Data," Mathematics, MDPI, vol. 12(23), pages 1-21, December.
    6. Yanjun Qin & Haiyong Luo & Fang Zhao & Zhongliang Zhao & Mengling Jiang, 2018. "A traffic pattern detection algorithm based on multimodal sensing," International Journal of Distributed Sensor Networks, , vol. 14(10), pages 15501477188, October.
    7. Mejía, Gonzalo & Aránguiz, Raúl & Espejo-Díaz, Julián Alberto & Granados-Rivera, Daniela & Mejía-Argueta, Christopher, 2023. "Can street markets be a sustainable strategy to mitigate food insecurity in emerging countries? Insights from a competitive facility location model," Socio-Economic Planning Sciences, Elsevier, vol. 86(C).
    8. Wu, Jishi & Feng, Tao & Jia, Peng & Li, Gen, 2024. "Spatial allocation of heavy commercial vehicles parking areas through geo-fencing," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    9. Ren, Xiyuan & Chow, Joseph Y.J., 2022. "A random-utility-consistent machine learning method to estimate agents’ joint activity scheduling choice from a ubiquitous data set," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 166(C), pages 396-418.
    10. Broach, Joseph & Dill, Jennifer & McNeil, Nathan Winslow, 2019. "Travel mode imputation using GPS and accelerometer data from a multi-day travel survey," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 194-204.
    11. Łukawska, Mirosława & Paulsen, Mads & Rasmussen, Thomas Kjær & Jensen, Anders Fjendbo & Nielsen, Otto Anker, 2023. "A joint bicycle route choice model for various cycling frequencies and trip distances based on a large crowdsourced GPS dataset," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    12. Thomas Feilhauer & Florian Braun & Katja Faller & David Hutter & Daniel Mathis & Johannes Neubauer & Jasmin Pogatschneg & Michelle Weber, 2021. "Mobility Choices—An Instrument for Precise Automatized Travel Behavior Detection & Analysis," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(4), pages 1-23, February.
    13. Seo, Toru & Kusakabe, Takahiko & Gotoh, Hiroto & Asakura, Yasuo, 2019. "Interactive online machine learning approach for activity-travel survey," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 123(C), pages 362-373.
    14. Hong, Shuyao & Zhao, Fang & Livshits, Vladimir & Gershenfeld, Shari & Santos, Jorge & Ben-Akiva, Moshe, 2021. "Insights on data quality from a large-scale application of smartphone-based travel survey technology in the Phoenix metropolitan area, Arizona, USA," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 413-429.
    15. Wang, Yu & Hancock, Thomas O. & Wang, Yacan & Choudhury, Charisma, 2025. "Modelling residential relocation behaviour combining passive revealed preference data and stated preference survey data," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 173(C).
    16. Peter Horbachov & Oleksandr Makarichev & Stanislav Svichynskyi & Ihor Ivanov, 2022. "Framework for designing sample travel surveys for transport demand modelling in cities," Transportation, Springer, vol. 49(1), pages 115-136, February.
    17. Zhenghong Peng & Guikai Bai & Hao Wu & Lingbo Liu & Yang Yu, 2021. "Travel mode recognition of urban residents using mobile phone data and MapAPI," Environment and Planning B, , vol. 48(9), pages 2574-2589, November.
    18. Chen, Liao & Ma, Shoufeng & Li, Changlin & Yang, Yuance & Wei, Wei & Cui, Runbang, 2024. "A spatial–temporal graph-based AI model for truck loan default prediction using large-scale GPS trajectory data," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 183(C).
    19. Paria Sadeghian & Arman Golshan & Mia Xiaoyun Zhao & Johan Håkansson, 2025. "A deep semi-supervised machine learning algorithm for detecting transportation modes based on GPS tracking data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 52(4), pages 1745-1765, August.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:205:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003398. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.