IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v204y2026ics0965856425004860.html

Cleaner skies, greener flights: empirical evidence from China

Author

Listed:
  • Wang, Chunan
  • Yin, Yingying
  • Yue, Shuai
  • Ji, Qing
  • Liao, Weijun

Abstract

This study provides the first comprehensive empirical evidence linking local air quality to aviation carbon emissions at the flight-segment level in China. Using a dataset of over 12 million flights and rigorous econometric modeling, we find that poorer air quality at both departure and arrival airports significantly increases carbon emissions, particularly during taxi-out and approach phases. Pollutants such as PM2.5, PM10, SO2, NO2, and CO consistently elevate emissions, while O3 shows an inverse effect. Regional and route-distance heterogeneities are pronounced, with Northeast China most affected during takeoff phase and the West during landing phase. The relationship is more marked under mild pollution, diminishing as stricter controls are imposed in severe pollution. Quantifying these impacts reveals substantial provincial disparities and highlights the externalities of air pollution on aviation. Our findings stress the need for region- and phase-specific emission reduction strategies and support China’s dual-carbon policy by demonstrating that air quality improvements yield measurable co-benefits in aviation decarbonization.

Suggested Citation

  • Wang, Chunan & Yin, Yingying & Yue, Shuai & Ji, Qing & Liao, Weijun, 2026. "Cleaner skies, greener flights: empirical evidence from China," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004860
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104853
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004860
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104853?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004860. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.