Author
Listed:
- Ghani, Maisha
- Rossolov, Oleksandr
- Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul
Abstract
Amid the diversification of work arrangements post COVID-19 and rapid advances in information and communication technologies (ICTs), this study examines how urban and rural individuals in Nova Scotia choose between on-site, hybrid, and remote work. Employing hybrid choice models using the 2022–23 NovaTRAC survey data, the analysis explores the urban–rural divide in the constraining and facilitating factors influencing work arrangement preferences. The results confirm that sociodemographic, dwelling, daily activity, mobility, and accessibility attributes, as well as latent attitudinal factors, are significant determinants of work mode choice across both regions. Urban residents with digital lifestyle orientations and reduced auto dependency are more inclined toward remote and hybrid work, respectively, while in rural areas, flexible work advocacy predicts hybrid preference, and private lifestyle orientation is linked to fully remote work. These latent attitudes are further shaped by age, household size, and education. Moreover, rural residents with greater discretionary and maintenance activity needs are more likely to prefer hybrid work. Lower-income rural residents tend to work on-site, even when employed in urban areas. Urban residents without private vehicles and with limited transit access are more likely to remote work. Individuals highly engaged in non-work online activities show stronger preferences for telework in both regions. Shorter working hours and long-distance auto commutes further reinforce the likelihood of remote work. Complementary pseudo-elasticity simulations highlight that the magnitude of these effects differs markedly across urban and rural contexts, with commuting burden and reduced work duration exerting disproportionately strong impacts in rural settings.
Suggested Citation
Ghani, Maisha & Rossolov, Oleksandr & Habib, Muhammad Ahsanul, 2026.
"Remote, on-site, or flexible: hybrid choice modelling of urban–rural heterogeneity in work arrangements,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004811
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104848
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004811. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.