Author
Listed:
- Oh, Dain
- Lee, Eun Hak
- Kim, Hyunmyung
- Kim, Eui-Jin
Abstract
Aging populations worldwide face increasing mobility challenges, particularly in rural areas where conventional public transit is limited. Demand-Responsive Transit (DRT) systems have emerged as a key solution to improve accessibility for older adults. However, low levels of digital literacy create significant barriers to accessing these services. To address this barrier, bridging technologies serve as behavioral nudges, linking advanced systems with simple, user-friendly interfaces. This study examines the impact of such a bridging technology on reshaping demand for DRT and Fixed-Route Transit (FRT) in South Korea, a rapidly aging society where this challenge is particularly acute. Specifically, we focus on a physical call button installed in senior centers, which enables older adults to connect directly with a customer service operator and request DRT service to their destination. While South Korea provides the empirical context, the study offers insights that may be relevant to other aging societies facing similar mobility challenges. The causal impact of this bridging technology is evaluated in Cheongju, South Korea. Results show that approximately 80% of service areas experienced an increase in DRT trips following the introduction of the bridging technology. This growth reflects two key trends: increased use of both DRT and FRT services, and additional DRT trips generated by modal shifts from non-public transits or newly induced demand. DRT trip growth was significantly associated with built environment characteristics, including senior center density and distance to medical facilities. These findings highlight the potential of simple, low-tech interventions to improve accessibility of advanced public transit for aging populations.
Suggested Citation
Oh, Dain & Lee, Eun Hak & Kim, Hyunmyung & Kim, Eui-Jin, 2026.
"Impact of bridging technology on older adults’ use of demand-responsive transit in a super-aged society,"
Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
Handle:
RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004586
DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104825
Download full text from publisher
As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to
for a different version of it.
Corrections
All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004586. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.
If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.
We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .
If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.
For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .
Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through
the various RePEc services.