IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v204y2026ics0965856425004422.html

Social and environmental disparities in mental health benefits from active transport in the UK: a causal machine learning analysis

Author

Listed:
  • Chen, Shujuan
  • Li, Yue
  • Jin, Ying

Abstract

Understanding the effects of active transport on mental well-being and the roles of social and environmental contexts is crucial for designing targeted interventions. It remains unclear whether working adults would gain mental health benefits if they had engaged in active commuting compared to motorized commuting, and if so, in which contexts and for whom these benefits are optimal. Existing studies typically examined general associations between commuting and mental health without considering counterfactual outcomes under different scenarios and contexts. They relied on traditional models inadequate for capturing treatment effects and their heterogeneities. This study proposes a causal machine learning (ML) framework to estimate average and heterogeneous treatment effects of active commuting, facilitating robust adjustment for confounding and selection bias. Using data from 145,547 UK adults aged 38 to 70 years, we assessed how transport modes influenced mental health, and how social and environmental conditions modified these effects. Individual heterogeneities were also examined to reveal spatial disparities. Results suggested that active commuting (walking or cycling) significantly reduced depression severity and risk, with stronger effects among younger adults and females. Longer weekly distance (10 to 30 miles) was associated with better mental health among active commuters and poorer outcomes among motorized commuters, though these associations were not statistically significant. Protective benefits were significantly greater in neighborhoods with more green space, farther from the nearest roads, and not close to major roads. Substantial spatial heterogeneities were observed, with stronger protective effects in less deprived and rural areas. Distinct rural–urban differences existed particularly in densely populated areas like Greater London. These findings underscore the importance of accounting for contextual variation when evaluating health effects of active transport and highlight the need for targeted urban and transportation policies that not only promote active commuting but also maximize its mental health benefits, especially for vulnerable groups and neighborhoods.

Suggested Citation

  • Chen, Shujuan & Li, Yue & Jin, Ying, 2026. "Social and environmental disparities in mental health benefits from active transport in the UK: a causal machine learning analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004422
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104809
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004422
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104809?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Simona Rasciute & Paul Downward, 2010. "Health or Happiness? What Is the Impact of Physical Activity on the Individual?," Kyklos, Wiley Blackwell, vol. 63(2), pages 256-270, May.
    2. Shliselberg, Rebecca & Givoni, Moshe & Kaplan, Sigal, 2020. "A behavioral framework for measuring motility: Linking past mobility experiences, motility and eudemonic well-being," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 141(C), pages 69-85.
    3. Wang, Xinyi & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2024. "Examining the treatment effect of teleworking on vehicle-miles driven: Applying an ordered probit selection model and incorporating the role of travel stress," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Eric Morris & Erick Guerra, 2015. "Mood and mode: does how we travel affect how we feel?," Transportation, Springer, vol. 42(1), pages 25-43, January.
    5. Daniel J Smith & Barbara I Nicholl & Breda Cullen & Daniel Martin & Zia Ul-Haq & Jonathan Evans & Jason M R Gill & Beverly Roberts & John Gallacher & Daniel Mackay & Matthew Hotopf & Ian Deary & Nick , 2013. "Prevalence and Characteristics of Probable Major Depression and Bipolar Disorder within UK Biobank: Cross-Sectional Study of 172,751 Participants," PLOS ONE, Public Library of Science, vol. 8(11), pages 1-7, November.
    6. Victor Chernozhukov & Denis Chetverikov & Mert Demirer & Esther Duflo & Christian Hansen & Whitney Newey & James Robins, 2018. "Double/debiased machine learning for treatment and structural parameters," Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 21(1), pages 1-68, February.
    7. repec:plo:pmed00:1001779 is not listed on IDEAS
    8. repec:plo:pone00:0177765 is not listed on IDEAS
    9. Zhi Cao & Jingbo Zhou & Meng Li & Jizhou Huang & Dejing Dou, 2023. "Urbanites’ mental health undermined by air pollution," Nature Sustainability, Nature, vol. 6(4), pages 470-478, April.
    10. Sung Hoo Kim & Patricia L. Mokhtarian, 2024. "A note on the sample selection (switching regression) model and treatment effects for a log-transformed outcome variable, in the context of residential self-selection," Transportation, Springer, vol. 51(5), pages 1723-1757, October.
    11. Ben Clark & Kiron Chatterjee & Adam Martin & Adrian Davis, 2020. "How commuting affects subjective wellbeing," Transportation, Springer, vol. 47(6), pages 2777-2805, December.
    12. Erik Berglund & Per Lytsy & Ragnar Westerling, 2016. "Active Traveling and Its Associations with Self-Rated Health, BMI and Physical Activity: A Comparative Study in the Adult Swedish Population," IJERPH, MDPI, vol. 13(5), pages 1-11, April.
    13. Imbens,Guido W. & Rubin,Donald B., 2015. "Causal Inference for Statistics, Social, and Biomedical Sciences," Cambridge Books, Cambridge University Press, number 9780521885881.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Ruoxuan Xiong & Allison Koenecke & Michael Powell & Zhu Shen & Joshua T. Vogelstein & Susan Athey, 2021. "Federated Causal Inference in Heterogeneous Observational Data," Papers 2107.11732, arXiv.org, revised Apr 2023.
    2. Barbora Mazúrová & Ján Kollár & Gabriela Nedelová, 2021. "Travel Mode of Commuting in Context of Subjective Well-Being—Experience from Slovakia," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 13(6), pages 1-17, March.
    3. Davide Viviano & Jelena Bradic, 2019. "Synthetic learner: model-free inference on treatments over time," Papers 1904.01490, arXiv.org, revised Aug 2022.
    4. Sung Jae Jun & Sokbae Lee, 2024. "Causal Inference Under Outcome-Based Sampling with Monotonicity Assumptions," Journal of Business & Economic Statistics, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 42(3), pages 998-1009, July.
    5. Yiyi Huo & Yingying Fan & Fang Han, 2023. "On the adaptation of causal forests to manifold data," Papers 2311.16486, arXiv.org, revised Dec 2023.
    6. Michael Lechner, 2023. "Causal Machine Learning and its use for public policy," Swiss Journal of Economics and Statistics, Springer;Swiss Society of Economics and Statistics, vol. 159(1), pages 1-15, December.
    7. Miruna Oprescu & Vasilis Syrgkanis & Zhiwei Steven Wu, 2018. "Orthogonal Random Forest for Causal Inference," Papers 1806.03467, arXiv.org, revised Sep 2019.
    8. Michael Alley & Max Biggs & Rim Hariss & Charles Herrmann & Michael Lingzhi Li & Georgia Perakis, 2023. "Pricing for Heterogeneous Products: Analytics for Ticket Reselling," Manufacturing & Service Operations Management, INFORMS, vol. 25(2), pages 409-426, March.
    9. Mark Kattenberg & Bas Scheer & Jurre Thiel, 2023. "Causal forests with fixed effects for treatment effect heterogeneity in difference-in-differences," CPB Discussion Paper 452, CPB Netherlands Bureau for Economic Policy Analysis.
    10. Alberto Abadie & Anish Agarwal & Raaz Dwivedi & Abhin Shah, 2024. "Doubly Robust Inference in Causal Latent Factor Models," Papers 2402.11652, arXiv.org, revised Oct 2024.
    11. Yumou Qiu & Jing Tao & Xiao‐Hua Zhou, 2021. "Inference of heterogeneous treatment effects using observational data with high‐dimensional covariates," Journal of the Royal Statistical Society Series B, Royal Statistical Society, vol. 83(5), pages 1016-1043, November.
    12. Zhang, Yingheng & Li, Haojie & Ren, Gang, 2025. "Analysing the role of traffic volume as mediator in transport policy evaluation with causal mediation analysis and targeted learning," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    13. Agboola, Oluwagbenga David & Yu, Han, 2023. "Neighborhood-based cross fitting approach to treatment effects with high-dimensional data," Computational Statistics & Data Analysis, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Aditya Ghosh & Dominik Rothenhausler, 2025. "Which Covariates to Adjust for? Specification-robust Causal Inference in Observational Studies," Papers 2505.08729, arXiv.org, revised Mar 2026.
    15. David M. Ritzwoller & Vasilis Syrgkanis, 2024. "Order-Explicit Linearization of High-Dimensional $U$-Statistics," Papers 2405.07860, arXiv.org, revised Jul 2026.
    16. Guido W. Imbens, 2020. "Potential Outcome and Directed Acyclic Graph Approaches to Causality: Relevance for Empirical Practice in Economics," Journal of Economic Literature, American Economic Association, vol. 58(4), pages 1129-1179, December.
    17. Phillip Heiler & Michael C. Knaus, 2025. "Heterogeneity Analysis with Heterogeneous Treatments," Papers 2507.01517, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2026.
    18. Alessio Abeltino & Andrea Pannone & Andrea Bernardini, 2026. "Speculation and retail price transmission in the frozen concentrated orange juice market: a causal machine learning analysis," Future Business Journal, Springer, vol. 12(1), pages 1-15, December.
    19. Ying Jin & Zhimei Ren & Zhengyuan Zhou, 2026. "Sensitivity Analysis Under the f -Sensitivity Model: A Distributional Robustness Perspective," Operations Research, INFORMS, vol. 74(2), pages 860-878, March.
    20. Michael C Knaus, 2022. "Double machine learning-based programme evaluation under unconfoundedness [Econometric methods for program evaluation]," The Econometrics Journal, Royal Economic Society, vol. 25(3), pages 602-627.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004422. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.