IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v204y2026ics0965856425004355.html

How should we measure flight shame and what are its main drivers?

Author

Listed:
  • Laurent, Sara
  • Chiambaretto, Paul
  • Bildstein, Camille

Abstract

The air transport industry is under increasing pressure to reduce its carbon emissions, driven by activist movements and widespread media coverage promoting the concept of “flight shame”—the idea that individuals should feel guilty about flying due to its significant environmental impact. Although the phenomenon has attracted considerable attention, its actual influence remains difficult to assess in the absence of a dedicated measurement scale capturing public sentiment toward aviation’s environmental footprint. This study addresses this gap by developing a flight shame scale, following Churchill’s paradigm, and validating it through two international samples (N = 595 and N = 574). The resulting scale identifies five items reflecting both environmental consciousness and social norms. Additionally, we investigate the determinants of flight shame using multiple linear regression analyses. Our results indicate that air passengers who report the highest levels of flight shame are those who, beyond the specific context of air travel, demonstrate strong environmental concerns and tend to adopt environmentally responsible behaviors in their daily lives. Furthermore, passengers who primarily travel for professional purposes, as well as those with lower levels of formal education, also appear to experience greater levels of flight shame.

Suggested Citation

  • Laurent, Sara & Chiambaretto, Paul & Bildstein, Camille, 2026. "How should we measure flight shame and what are its main drivers?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004355
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104802
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004355
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104802?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004355. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.