IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v204y2026ics096585642500343x.html

Modelling multimodal mode choice behaviour considering spatial variability in level of service attributes

Author

Listed:
  • Feroz, Malik Najeebul
  • Nirmale, Sangram Krishna
  • Koushik, Anil
  • Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof

Abstract

This study formulates a multimodal mode choice model that reflects the multimodal nature of transit trips, including the presence of access and egress legs. The model takes the form of a two-level mixed multinomial logit, where the primary mode choice is modelled at the top level and the access and egress mode choices are modelled at the bottom level. Further, the modelling framework recognizes the spatial variability in thelevel-of-service (LOS) attributes of primary and access/egress modes due to imprecise location data of trip destinations. To do so, the LOS attributes are specified as stochastic explanatory variables, with their distributions empirically characterized a priori. In addition, the study evaluates a suitable aggregation for defining traffic analysis zones (TAZs) for mode choice modelling in Indian cities. The empirical analysis and modelling in this research are applied to a home-to-work commute mode choice survey (revealed preference) data collected in Bengaluru, India. The results indicate that models that consider measurement error in LOS attributes (due to spatial aggregation) offered better data fit and willingness-to-pay measures than the models that ignore measurement errors. If the analyst is unable to consider the measurement error due to computational reasons, empirical models with Census block groups (with an average area of 0.27 km2) as TAZs yielded better results than those with Census wards (with an average area of 3.5 km2). Therefore, the study recommends adopting Census block groups as TAZs for modelling travel demand in Indian cities. Finally, policy analyses conducted using the proposed model suggest that expanding public transit along with access-end and egress-end connectivity to make transit accessible to a large population would be an effective way to increase transit mode share in Bengaluru.

Suggested Citation

  • Feroz, Malik Najeebul & Nirmale, Sangram Krishna & Koushik, Anil & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2026. "Modelling multimodal mode choice behaviour considering spatial variability in level of service attributes," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 204(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s096585642500343x
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104710
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S096585642500343X
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104710?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Guilhermina Torrao & Amal Htait & Shun Ha Sylvia Wong, 2024. "Perceptions of Women’s Safety in Transient Environments and the Potential Role of AI in Enhancing Safety: An Inclusive Mobility Study in India," Sustainability, MDPI, vol. 16(19), pages 1-23, October.
    2. Srinivasan, Karthik K. & Prakash, A.A. & Seshadri, Ravi, 2014. "Finding most reliable paths on networks with correlated and shifted log–normal travel times," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 66(C), pages 110-128.
    3. Kim, Sungyop & Ulfarsson, Gudmundur F. & Todd Hennessy, J., 2007. "Analysis of light rail rider travel behavior: Impacts of individual, built environment, and crime characteristics on transit access," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 41(6), pages 511-522, July.
    4. Shiva Habibi & Emma Frejinger & Marcus Sundberg, 2019. "An empirical study on aggregation of alternatives and its influence on prediction in car type choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 46(3), pages 563-582, June.
    5. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:3, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    6. Daniel Hellerstein, 2005. "Modeling Discrete Choice with Uncertain Data: An Augmented MNL Estimator," American Journal of Agricultural Economics, Agricultural and Applied Economics Association, vol. 87(1), pages 77-84.
    7. Sanko, Nobuhiro & Hess, Stephane & Dumont, Jeffrey & Daly, Andrew, 2014. "Contrasting imputation with a latent variable approach to dealing with missing income in choice models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 12(C), pages 47-57.
    8. Malokin, Aliaksandr & Circella, Giovanni & Mokhtarian, Patricia L., 2019. "How do activities conducted while commuting influence mode choice? Using revealed preference models to inform public transportation advantage and autonomous vehicle scenarios," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 124(C), pages 82-114.
    9. Oostendorp, Rebekka & Gebhardt, Laura, 2018. "Combining means of transport as a users' strategy to optimize traveling in an urban context: empirical results on intermodal travel behavior from a survey in Berlin," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 71(C), pages 72-83.
    10. Leong, Joseph & Nassir, Neema & Mohri, Seyed Sina & Sarvi, Majid, 2024. "A dynamic discrete choice modelling approach for forward-looking travel mode choices," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 190(C).
    11. Meyer de Freitas, Lucas & Becker, Henrik & Zimmermann, Maëlle & Axhausen, Kay W., 2019. "Modelling intermodal travel in Switzerland: A recursive logit approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 119(C), pages 200-213.
    12. Díaz, Federico & Cantillo, Víctor & Arellana, Julian & Ortúzar, Juan de Dios, 2015. "Accounting for stochastic variables in discrete choice models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 78(C), pages 222-237.
    13. Biswas, Mehek & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2024. "The use of pooled RP-SP choice data to simultaneously identify alternative attributes and random coefficients on those attributes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Roy, Sanghamitra & Bailey, Ajay & van Noorloos, Femke, 2024. "The everyday struggles of accessing public transport for women in the first- and last-mile stretches in Kolkata," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 117(C).
    15. Ma, Mingyou & Chen, Yuhui & Liu, Wei & Waller, S. Travis, 2023. "An economic analysis of a multi-modal transportation system with ride-sourcing services and multi-class users," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 140(C), pages 1-17.
    16. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 520-541.
    17. Wong, Timothy & Brownstone, David & Bunch, David S., 2019. "Aggregation biases in discrete choice models," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 31(C), pages 210-221.
    18. Chakrabarti, Sandip, 2022. "Passively wait for gridlock, or proactively invest in service? Strategies to promote car-to-transit switches among aspirational urbanites in rapidly developing contexts," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 115(C), pages 251-261.
    19. Bhatta, Bharat P. & Larsen, Odd I., 2011. "Errors in variables in multinomial choice modeling: A simulation study applied to a multinomial logit model of travel mode choice," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 18(2), pages 326-335, March.
    20. Clauss, Thomas & Döppe, Sebastian, 2016. "Why do urban travelers select multimodal travel options: A repertory grid analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 93(C), pages 93-116.
    21. Dacko, Scott G. & Spalteholz, Carolin, 2014. "Upgrading the city: Enabling intermodal travel behaviour," Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Elsevier, vol. 89(C), pages 222-235.
    22. Varotto, Silvia F. & Glerum, Aurélie & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Bierlaire, Michel & Longo, Giovanni, 2017. "Mitigating the impact of errors in travel time reporting on mode choice modelling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 236-246.
    23. Tilahun, Nebiyou & Thakuriah, Piyushimita (Vonu) & Li, Moyin & Keita, Yaye, 2016. "Transit use and the work commute: Analyzing the role of last mile issues," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 54(C), pages 359-368.
    24. Yatchew, Adonis & Griliches, Zvi, 1985. "Specification Error in Probit Models," The Review of Economics and Statistics, MIT Press, vol. 67(1), pages 134-139, February.
    25. Krygsman, Stephan & Dijst, Martin & Arentze, Theo, 2004. "Multimodal public transport: an analysis of travel time elements and the interconnectivity ratio," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 11(3), pages 265-275, July.
    26. Chen, Anthony & Zhou, Zhong & Lam, William H.K., 2011. "Modeling stochastic perception error in the mean-excess traffic equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 45(10), pages 1619-1640.
    27. Joel L. Horowitz, 1983. "Statistical Comparison of Non-Nested Probabilistic Discrete Choice Models," Transportation Science, INFORMS, vol. 17(3), pages 319-350, August.
    28. Ashik, F.R. & Sreezon, A.I.Z. & Rahman, M.H. & Zafri, N.M. & Labib, S.M., 2024. "Built environment influences commute mode choice in a global south megacity context: Insights from explainable machine learning approach," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 116(C).
    29. Biswas, Mehek & Bhat, Chandra R. & Ghosh, Sulagna & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2024. "Choice models with stochastic variables and random coefficients," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    30. Vij, Akshay & Walker, Joan L., 2016. "How, when and why integrated choice and latent variable models are latently useful," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 90(C), pages 192-217.
    31. Lorenzo Varela, Juan Manuel & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Public transport: One mode or several?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 113(C), pages 137-156.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Nirmale, Sangram Krishna & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2023. "Discrete choice models with multiplicative stochasticity in choice environment variables: Application to accommodating perception errors in driver behaviour models," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 170(C), pages 169-193.
    2. Biswas, Mehek & Bhat, Chandra R. & Ghosh, Sulagna & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2024. "Choice models with stochastic variables and random coefficients," Journal of choice modelling, Elsevier, vol. 51(C).
    3. Biswas, Mehek & Bhat, Chandra R. & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof, 2024. "The use of pooled RP-SP choice data to simultaneously identify alternative attributes and random coefficients on those attributes," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    4. Batarce, Marco, 2024. "Estimation of discrete choice models with error in variables: An application to revealed preference data with aggregate service level variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 185(C).
    5. Timmer, Sebastian & Merfeld, Katrin & Henkel, Sven, 2023. "Exploring motivations for multimodal commuting: A hierarchical means-end chain analysis," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    6. Chakroborty, Partha & Pinjari, Abdul Rawoof & Meena, Jayant & Gandhi, Avinash, 2021. "A Psychophysical Ordered Response Model of Time Perception and Service Quality: Application to Level of Service Analysis at Toll Plazas," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 154(C), pages 44-64.
    7. Carlos Carrion & David Levinson, 2019. "Overestimation and underestimation of travel time on commute trips: GPS vs. self- reporting," Working Papers 2019-05, University of Minnesota: Nexus Research Group.
    8. Thomas E. Guerrero & C. Angelo Guevara & Elisabetta Cherchi & Juan de Dios Ortúzar, 2021. "Addressing endogeneity in strategic urban mode choice models," Transportation, Springer, vol. 48(4), pages 2081-2102, August.
    9. Peer, Stefanie & Börjesson, Maria, 2018. "Temporal framing of stated preference experiments: does it affect valuations?," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 117(C), pages 319-333.
    10. Eivind Tveter, 2023. "The value of travel time: a revealed preferences approach using exogenous variation in travel costs and automatic traffic count data," Transportation, Springer, vol. 50(6), pages 2273-2297, December.
    11. Varotto, Silvia F. & Glerum, Aurélie & Stathopoulos, Amanda & Bierlaire, Michel & Longo, Giovanni, 2017. "Mitigating the impact of errors in travel time reporting on mode choice modelling," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 62(C), pages 236-246.
    12. Lieu, Seung Jae & Akar, Gulsah, 2025. "Understanding rail users' mode choice behavior for first and last mile travel," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 125(C).
    13. Mann, Isaac & Levinson, David M., 2025. "Valuing travel time and reliability from emerging connected vehicle data," Economics of Transportation, Elsevier, vol. 44(C).
    14. Sogbe, Eugene & Susilawati, Susilawati & Pin, Tan Chee, 2024. "First-mile and last-mile externalities: Perspectives from a developing country," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 121(C).
    15. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 117(PA), pages 520-541.
    16. Varela, Juan Manuel Lorenzo & Börjesson, Maria & Daly, Andrew, 2018. "Quantifying errors in travel time and cost by latent variables," Working papers in Transport Economics 2018:3, CTS - Centre for Transport Studies Stockholm (KTH and VTI).
    17. Kriswardhana, Willy & Esztergár-Kiss, Domokos, 2025. "Generational differences in the preferences for MaaS bundles," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 126(C).
    18. Aaditya, Bh. & Rahul, T.M., 2021. "Psychological impacts of COVID-19 pandemic on the mode choice behaviour: A hybrid choice modelling approach," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 108(C), pages 47-58.
    19. Dylan Moinse & Matthieu Goudeau & Alain L’Hostis & Thomas Leysens, 2024. "Intermodal use of (e-)scooters with train in the Provence-Alpes-Côte d’Azur region: towards extended train stations areas?," Environmental Economics and Policy Studies, Springer;Society for Environmental Economics and Policy Studies - SEEPS, vol. 26(2), pages 165-198, April.
    20. Stuart Donovan & Thomas de Graaff & Henri L.F. de Groot, 2023. "An inexact science: Accounting for measurement error and downward bias in mode and location choice models," Tinbergen Institute Discussion Papers 23-010/VIII, Tinbergen Institute.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:204:y:2026:i:c:s096585642500343x. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.