IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425004185.html

Evaluating government road tolling initiatives ex-post: An econometric assessment with evidence from Norway

Author

Listed:
  • Odeck, James

Abstract

Toll road initiatives play a pivotal role in financing infrastructure projects, particularly when traditional government funding sources are constrained. These initiatives typically involve imposing tolls for a predefined period, after which tolls are removed to reduce the long-term financial burden on road users. Despite their widespread application, the transportation literature offers limited systematic evidence on how governments meet their stated tolling objectives, the potential biases in their forecasts, and the determinants of deviations from planned outcomes. This paper addresses these gaps through an ex-post evaluation of Norwegian toll projects implemented and completed between 1984 and 2020. Covering approximately 90 % of all relevant cases during this period, the study uses robust econometric techniques to assess the presence of systematic biases in government forecasts and identify key factors influencing the duration of tolling. The results reveal several important findings. First, the government’s primary objective—removal of tolls within the planned time frame—is generally achieved, with tolls being removed, on average, 1.45 years earlier than estimated. Second, traffic volumes tend to exceed forecasts, while cost estimates are typically optimistic, resulting in modest overruns. Third, although mean percentage errors indicate moderate under- and overestimations—well within expected margins and significantly smaller than the forecast deviations commonly reported internationally—statistical tests confirm that the government’s forecasts are systematically biased. This suggests that the deviations are not due to random variation alone but reflect consistent patterns in estimation. Finally, variations in toll durations are significantly influenced by financing conditions, particularly interest rates, as well as project characteristics such as road type, centrality, and cost structure. These insights demonstrate that Norway’s tolling system has largely delivered on its promises and highlight the importance of refining forecasting methodologies for future policy planning. This study underscores the value of ex-post evaluations in understanding infrastructure performance and calls for more empirical research on the fulfillment of public sector commitments in transport financing.

Suggested Citation

  • Odeck, James, 2026. "Evaluating government road tolling initiatives ex-post: An econometric assessment with evidence from Norway," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004185
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104785
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425004185
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104785?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425004185. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.