IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425003957.html

Exploring influential factors of fleet and parking management in shared autonomous vehicle systems: An agent-based simulation framework

Author

Listed:
  • Lin, Yuqian
  • Zhang, Kenan
  • Kondor, Daniel
  • Zhao, Zhan
  • Ratti, Carlo
  • Xu, Yang

Abstract

Shared autonomous vehicles (SAVs) are expected to enhance urban transportation efficiency through innovative mobility resource management. By developing a comprehensive agent-based simulation framework, this study investigates several key factors influencing fleet size and parking demand for the adoption of SAVs in future urban mobility systems. The framework evaluates how both operational factors (e.g., reservation time and maximum waiting time) and demand-side characteristics (e.g., demand rate and the balance between trip origins and destinations) jointly affect the performance of the SAV system. It uses a two-stage simulation process that includes capacity estimation and performance evaluation. In the initial warm-up stage, the simulation estimates the fleet size and parking spaces needed to serve specific travel demand. These initial estimates are then used in the second stage to run further simulations and assess additional performance indicators, including final required parking spaces, empty meters traveled, and trip rejection rate. To obtain a holistic understanding of the studied factors, we construct various simulation scenarios based on historical taxi data in central areas of Chengdu, Shanghai (China), and Manhattan of New York City (USA), and build structural regression models on the simulation outcomes. The results reveal a general mechanism by which operational characteristics and demand patterns influence SAV fleet and parking sizes. We find that a 1 % increase in overall travel demand results in about a 1 % increase in the number of SAVs needed and required parking spaces. Meanwhile, a 1 % improvement in the balance of origin-destination (OD) trips, which reduces spatial mismatches between vehicle supply and trip requests, can help offset the need for additional vehicles and parking spaces. These findings offer critical policy implications, emphasizing the need for integrating SAV deployment with land-use strategies, balancing fleet investment, environmental costs, and service quality (e.g., lower waiting time) in SAV planning and operations.

Suggested Citation

  • Lin, Yuqian & Zhang, Kenan & Kondor, Daniel & Zhao, Zhan & Ratti, Carlo & Xu, Yang, 2026. "Exploring influential factors of fleet and parking management in shared autonomous vehicle systems: An agent-based simulation framework," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
    • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003957
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104762
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003957
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only
    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104762?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    References listed on IDEAS

    as
    1. Zhang, Xiang & Sun, Haojie & Pei, Xiaoyang & Guan, Linghui & Wang, Zihao, 2024. "Evolution of technology investment and development of robotaxi services," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    2. Huang, Kai & An, Kun & Correia, Gonçalo Homem de Almeida, 2020. "Planning station capacity and fleet size of one-way electric carsharing systems with continuous state of charge functions," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 287(3), pages 1075-1091.
    3. Bahk, Younghun & Hyland, Michael & An, Sunghi, 2024. "Re-envisioning the Park-and-Ride concept for the automated vehicle (AV) era with Private-to-Shared AV transfer stations," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    4. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Meng, 2022. "Modelling bidding behaviors in shared parking auctions considering anticipated regrets," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 161(C), pages 88-106.
    5. Christian B. Hunter & Kara M. Kockelman & Shadi Djavadian, 2024. "Curb Allocation and Pick-Up Drop-Off Aggregation for a Shared Autonomous Vehicle Fleet," International Regional Science Review, , vol. 47(2), pages 131-158, March.
    6. Liu, Zhiyong & Li, Ruimin & Dai, Jingchen, 2022. "Effects and feasibility of shared mobility with shared autonomous vehicles: An investigation based on data-driven modeling approach," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 156(C), pages 206-226.
    7. Melendez, Kevin A. & Das, Tapas K. & Kwon, Changhyun, 2020. "Optimal operation of a system of charging hubs and a fleet of shared autonomous electric vehicles," Applied Energy, Elsevier, vol. 279(C).
    8. Cui, Hongjun & Yang, Yizhe & Zhu, Minqing & Ma, Xinwei & Chen, Xiuyong & Qie, Binghui, 2023. "The scheduling methods with different demand priorities for shared autonomous vehicle system in hybrid demands mode considering dynamic travel time," Physica A: Statistical Mechanics and its Applications, Elsevier, vol. 632(P1).
    9. Wang, Hai & Yang, Hai, 2019. "Ridesourcing systems: A framework and review," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 129(C), pages 122-155.
    10. Choi, Seongjin & Lee, Jinwoo, 2023. "Optimal planning of parking infrastructure and fleet size for Shared Autonomous Vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 176(C).
    11. Gurumurthy, Krishna Murthy & Kockelman, Kara M., 2022. "Dynamic ride-sharing impacts of greater trip demand and aggregation at stops in shared autonomous vehicle systems," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 160(C), pages 114-125.
    12. Milakis, Dimitris & Kroesen, Maarten & van Wee, Bert, 2018. "Implications of automated vehicles for accessibility and location choices: Evidence from an expert-based experiment," Journal of Transport Geography, Elsevier, vol. 68(C), pages 142-148.
    13. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Meng & Gao, Ziyou, 2018. "Shared parking problem: A novel truthful double auction mechanism approach," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 109(C), pages 40-69.
    14. Chen, Yao & Liu, Yang & Bai, Yun & Mao, Baohua, 2024. "Real-time dispatch management of shared autonomous vehicles with on-demand and pre-booked requests," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 181(C).
    15. Allan Pimenta & Md. Kamruzzaman & Graham Currie, 2025. "Exploring gaps in residential and parking location choice models for autonomous vehicles: a proposed evaluation framework," Transport Reviews, Taylor & Francis Journals, vol. 45(1), pages 94-118, January.
    16. Wong, Stephen & Shaheen, Susan PhD, 2020. "Synthesis of State-Level Planning and Strategic Actions on Automated Vehicles: Lessons and Policy Guidance for California," Institute of Transportation Studies, Research Reports, Working Papers, Proceedings qt6mf030xb, Institute of Transportation Studies, UC Berkeley.
    17. Zhang, Wenwen & Wang, Kaidi, 2020. "Parking futures: Shared automated vehicles and parking demand reduction trajectories in Atlanta," Land Use Policy, Elsevier, vol. 91(C).
    18. M. M. Vazifeh & P. Santi & G. Resta & S. H. Strogatz & C. Ratti, 2018. "Addressing the minimum fleet problem in on-demand urban mobility," Nature, Nature, vol. 557(7706), pages 534-538, May.
    Full references (including those not matched with items on IDEAS)

    Most related items

    These are the items that most often cite the same works as this one and are cited by the same works as this one.
    1. Li, Qing & Liao, Feixiong & Xu, Wei & Huang, Hai-Jun, 2025. "Fleet sizing and pricing for hybrid ownership of shared autonomous vehicles in a multimodal transportation system," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 193(C).
    2. Duan, Xu & Si, Hongyun & Xiang, Pengcheng, 2025. "Technology into reality: Disentangling the challenges of shared autonomous electric vehicles implementation from stakeholder perspectives," Energy, Elsevier, vol. 316(C).
    3. Zhu, Zheng & Xu, Ailing & He, Qiao-Chu & Yang, Hai, 2021. "Competition between the transportation network company and the government with subsidies to public transit riders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 152(C).
    4. Sen Li & Kameshwar Poolla & Pravin Varaiya, 2020. "Impact of Congestion Charge and Minimum Wage on TNCs: A Case Study for San Francisco," Papers 2003.02550, arXiv.org, revised Feb 2021.
    5. Bao, Yue & Zang, Guangzhi & Yang, Hai & Gao, Ziyou & Long, Jiancheng, 2023. "Mathematical modeling of the platform assignment problem in a ride-sourcing market with a third-party integrator," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 178(C).
    6. Bian, Zheyong & Liu, Xiang & Bai, Yun, 2020. "Mechanism design for on-demand first-mile ridesharing," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 138(C), pages 77-117.
    7. Yang, Hai & Qin, Xiaoran & Ke, Jintao & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Optimizing matching time interval and matching radius in on-demand ride-sourcing markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 131(C), pages 84-105.
    8. Ding, Xiaoshu & Qi, Qi & Jian, Sisi, 2024. "Truthful online double auctions for on-demand integrated ride-sourcing platforms," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 317(3), pages 737-747.
    9. Xiao, Haohan & Xu, Min & Wang, Shuaian, 2024. "Auction-based parking mechanisms considering withdrawal behaviors," Transport Policy, Elsevier, vol. 147(C), pages 81-93.
    10. Gao, Chang & Lin, Xi & He, Fang & Tang, Xindi, 2024. "Online relocating and matching of ride-hailing services: A model-based modular approach," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 188(C).
    11. Zhang, Li & Chen, Tingting & Yao, Baozhen & Yu, Bin & Wang, Yunpeng, 2025. "Routing and charging scheduling for the electric carsharing system with mobile charging vehicles," Omega, Elsevier, vol. 131(C).
    12. Kucharski, Rafał & Cats, Oded, 2020. "Exact matching of attractive shared rides (ExMAS) for system-wide strategic evaluations," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 285-310.
    13. Gu, Yu & Chen, Anthony & Kitthamkesorn, Songyot, 2024. "Modeling shared parking services at spatially correlated locations through a weibit-based combined destination and parking choice equilibrium model," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 186(C).
    14. Ji, Wen & Liu, Shenglin & Han, Ke & Li, Yanfeng & Liu, Tao, 2024. "The Share-a-Ride Problem with mixed ride-hailing and logistic vehicles," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 192(C).
    15. Ke, Jintao & Yang, Hai & Li, Xinwei & Wang, Hai & Ye, Jieping, 2020. "Pricing and equilibrium in on-demand ride-pooling markets," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 139(C), pages 411-431.
    16. Li, Sen & Poolla, Kameshwar & Varaiya, Pravin, 2021. "Impact of congestion charge and minimum wage on TNCs: A case study for San Francisco," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 148(C), pages 237-261.
    17. Zhang, Si & Sun, Huijun & Wang, Xu & Lv, Ying & Wu, Jianjun, 2022. "Optimization of personalized price discounting scheme for one-way station-based carsharing systems," European Journal of Operational Research, Elsevier, vol. 303(1), pages 220-238.
    18. Pimenta, Allan & Kamruzzaman, Liton (Md) & Huda, Fuad & Currie, Graham, 2025. "Examining parking preferences with private autonomous vehicles using random forest and logit models: the case of commuters to central Melbourne," Research in Transportation Economics, Elsevier, vol. 114(C).
    19. Jiang, Yanping & Gao, Zhan & Zheng, Tingwen & Zhang, Yan, 2025. "Enhanced Benders decomposition approach for shared vacant private parking spaces allocation method considering uncertain parking duration of demanders," Transportation Research Part E: Logistics and Transportation Review, Elsevier, vol. 199(C).
    20. Shao, Saijun & Xu, Su Xiu & Yang, Hai & Huang, George Q., 2020. "Parking reservation disturbances," Transportation Research Part B: Methodological, Elsevier, vol. 135(C), pages 83-97.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003957. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    If CitEc recognized a bibliographic reference but did not link an item in RePEc to it, you can help with this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.