IDEAS home Printed from https://ideas.repec.org/a/eee/transa/v203y2026ics0965856425003726.html

Political belief, attitudes toward risk, and behavior on the road

Author

Listed:
  • Ben-Shahar, Danny
  • Gabriel, Stuart
  • Nayer, Dana

Abstract

We utilize unique information on traffic citations to explore the role of political belief in risky driving behavior. Information on this little-explored measure of risk-taking is obtained from the traffic citations dataset of the Israel Police for 2019–2022. We identify political belief based on voting outcomes by small statistical area for the 2019 Israel parliament elections. Controlling for statistical area socio-economic and demographic characteristics, geographic centrality and access, and traffic enforcement, results indicate substantial variation in risk-related traffic violations by political belief. Results show that statistical areas that support liberal parties exhibit, on average, 20–25 percent fewer risk-related traffic citations than those statistical areas that support conservative parties. Findings provide new insights as to the prediction of risk-related traffic violations and inform specification of community traffic enforcement and messaging protocols so as to reduce injury and enhance safety.

Suggested Citation

  • Ben-Shahar, Danny & Gabriel, Stuart & Nayer, Dana, 2026. "Political belief, attitudes toward risk, and behavior on the road," Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, Elsevier, vol. 203(C).
  • Handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003726
    DOI: 10.1016/j.tra.2025.104739
    as

    Download full text from publisher

    File URL: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0965856425003726
    Download Restriction: Full text for ScienceDirect subscribers only

    File URL: https://libkey.io/10.1016/j.tra.2025.104739?utm_source=ideas
    LibKey link: if access is restricted and if your library uses this service, LibKey will redirect you to where you can use your library subscription to access this item
    ---><---

    As the access to this document is restricted, you may want to

    for a different version of it.

    More about this item

    Keywords

    ;
    ;
    ;

    Statistics

    Access and download statistics

    Corrections

    All material on this site has been provided by the respective publishers and authors. You can help correct errors and omissions. When requesting a correction, please mention this item's handle: RePEc:eee:transa:v:203:y:2026:i:c:s0965856425003726. See general information about how to correct material in RePEc.

    If you have authored this item and are not yet registered with RePEc, we encourage you to do it here. This allows to link your profile to this item. It also allows you to accept potential citations to this item that we are uncertain about.

    We have no bibliographic references for this item. You can help adding them by using this form .

    If you know of missing items citing this one, you can help us creating those links by adding the relevant references in the same way as above, for each refering item. If you are a registered author of this item, you may also want to check the "citations" tab in your RePEc Author Service profile, as there may be some citations waiting for confirmation.

    For technical questions regarding this item, or to correct its authors, title, abstract, bibliographic or download information, contact: Catherine Liu (email available below). General contact details of provider: http://www.elsevier.com/wps/find/journaldescription.cws_home/547/description#description .

    Please note that corrections may take a couple of weeks to filter through the various RePEc services.

    IDEAS is a RePEc service. RePEc uses bibliographic data supplied by the respective publishers.